From: Raczkowski, David [e-mail address redacted] 
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2014 2:44 PM
To: myriad-mayo_2014
Subject: feedback on rules

Hello,
 

In the attached paper [http://www.kilpatricktownsend.com/~/media/
Files/articles/2014/Routine%20Means%20Necessary%20For%20
Section%20101%203.ashx.], I point out problems in the new guidelines.  
This paper was written before the Supreme Court’s decision in CLS Bank, 
which did not change the proper interpretation of “routine” meaning necessary.  
CLS bank simply concluded that a computer was effectively necessary, and 
thus the claims were co-extensive with the abstract idea.
 
Regards
Dave
 
 

David Raczkowski       
Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP  
Eighth Floor | Two Embarcadero Center | San Francisco, CA 94111 
office 415 273 7555 | fax 415 723 7192