Date Type of Proceeding
Issued Case (1) or App'n No. Party/Parties
9-25 OPP 96,405 Bridgestone/
Firestone, Inc. v.
Interco Tire Corp.
9-25 EX 75/023,135 Enersyst
Development
Center
9-25 EX 74/658,746 Auto Parts
(R) Club, LLC
Opposer's/ Applicant's/
Petitioner's Respondent's
TTAB Mark and Mark and
Issue Decision Goods/Services Goods/Services
de jure Opposition configuration of
function- Sustained the tread design
ality; (but only on of a tire asserted
acquired the grounds as a trademark for
distinctive- of lack of applicant's tires
ness [under acquired dis-
Sec. 2(f)] tinctiveness)
2(e)(1) Refusal "AIR FRYER"
Affirmed [ovens, namely,
commercial cooking
impingement and
convection ovens]
2(e)(1) Request for "AUTO PARTS CLUB"
[genericness] Reconsidera- [discount whole-
tion Denied sale and retail
[Refusal store services in
Affirmed] the field of
automotive parts]
Mark and Citable as
Goods Cited by Precedent
Examining Atty. of TTAB
No
No
No
(1)EX=EX PARTE APPEAL; OPP=OPPOSITION; CANC=CANCELLATION; CU=CONCURRENT
USE; (SJ)=SUMMARY JUDGMENT; (R)=REQ. FOR RECONSIDERATION