Date Type of Proceeding
Issued Case (1) or App'n No. Party/Parties
8-27 EX 74/631,589 Greenleaf, Inc.
8-27 EX 74/700,586 LeGrand Bennett
and Anne Bennett
8-27 EX 75/108,390 Dennis Bearden
Opposer's/ Applicant's/
Petitioner's Respondent's
TTAB Mark and Mark and
Issue Decision Goods/Services Goods/Services
de jure Refusal configuration
function- Affirmed of the flatpack
ality; (on both envelope that
whether grounds) serves as a con-
applicant's tainer for
product applicant's goods
configuration [air fresheners]
has become
distinctive
under
Section 2(f)
de jure Refusal the brim configur-
function- Affirmed ation of a sun
ality; (but only on visor or cap
whether ground that [visors and caps]
applicant's applicant's
product product
configura- configuration
tion is is not
inherently inherently
distinctive distinctive)
2(d) Refusal "CENTURY A/C
Affirmed SUPPLY"
(and design)
[wholesale
distributorships
featuring air
conditioning sup-
plies for
contractors and
for multi-family
housing]
Mark and Citable as
Goods Cited by Precedent
Examining Atty. of TTAB
No
No
"CENTURY" No
[electronic air cleaners;
air conditioners; gas, oil
and electric furnaces;
heat pumps, blowers,
coils, coil cabinets,
electric duct heaters,
humidifiers, air handlers
and condensing units]
(1)EX=EX PARTE APPEAL; OPP=OPPOSITION; CANC=CANCELLATION; CU=CONCURRENT
USE; (SJ)=SUMMARY JUDGMENT; (R)=REQ. FOR RECONSIDERATION