Date Type of Proceeding
Issued Case (1) or App'n No. Party/Parties
9-30 OPP 105,884 Starfish Software,
Inc. v. FileTrak
Software, Inc.
9-30 EX 75/240,225 Chewing Brush,
Inc.
9-30 EX 75/159,195 Cortec Corp.
9-30 EX 75/293,155 Nu Skin Int'l.,
Inc.
Opposer's/ Applicant's/
Petitioner's Respondent's
TTAB Mark and Mark and
Issue Decision Goods/Services Goods/Services
2(d) Opposition "SIDEKICK" "FILEKICK"
Dismissed [various computer [computer
software products] software for file
management]
2(e)(1) Refusal "CHEWING BRUSH"
Affirmed [tooth brushes]
(but only to
the extent of
requiring
applicant to
submit a
disclaimer of
the word
BRUSH)
2(e)(1) Refusal "MIGRATING
[gener- Affirmed CORROSION
icness]; (on both INHIBITORS"
whether grounds) [chemical
applicant's preparation for
mark, if not use in reduction
generic, has of corrosion of
acquired dis- steel reinforcing
tinctiveness members present
under in concrete
Sec. 2(f) structures]
2(d) Refusal "HAIRFITNESS"
Affirmed [hair care and
styling prepara-
tions, namely,
shampoos, hair
and scalp
conditioners,
hair detangling
preparations,
etc.]
Marks and Citable as
Goods Cited by Precedent
Examining Atty. of TTAB
No
No
No
"HAIR FITNESS" No
(and design)
[vitamin and nutritional
supplements for the hair]
(1)EX=EX PARTE APPEAL; OPP=OPPOSITION; CANC=CANCELLATION; CU=CONCURRENT
USE; (SJ)=SUMMARY JUDGMENT; (R)=REQ. FOR RECONSIDERATION