Date Type of Proceeding Issued Case (1) or App'n No. Party/Parties 10-19 OPP 103,832 Maylon E. Dickey v. Metro Industries 10-20 OPP 101,650 Nabisco, Inc. v. (R) Sathers Inc. Opposer's/ Applicant's/ Petitioner's Respondent's TTAB Mark and Mark and Issue Decision Goods/Services Goods/Services 2(d) Opposition "E.C.O." "E.C.G. Sustained [chemical-free ENVIRONMENTAL absorbent granular CLEANING mixture of baked GRANULES" clay and silicon (in stylized sand for use by lettering) home owners, com- [cleaning prepara- mercial business tions, namely, establishments, chemical free highway depart- granular absorbent ments and fire material of baked departments in clay for use with cleaning oil and patented cleaning grease spills on equipment for asphalt and con- absorption of crete surfaces] liquid substances to include, but not limited to, oils, grease, transmission fluid, hydraulic fluid and anti-freeze] 2(e)(1); Request for "TANGY FRUITS" genericness; Reconsidera- [candy] whether tion Denied applicant's [Opposition mark has Dismissed acquired dis- (based on tinctiveness findings of under Section non-generic- 2(f) ness and acquired distinctive- ness of applicant's mark)] Mark and Citable as Goods Cited by Precedent Examining Atty. of TTAB No No (1)EX=EX PARTE APPEAL; OPP=OPPOSITION; CANC=CANCELLATION; CU=CONCURRENT USE; (SJ)=SUMMARY JUDGMENT; (R)=REQ. FOR RECONSIDERATION