Adverse Decisions in Interference

   In the designated interferences involving the following patents, final
decisions have been rendered that the respective patentees are not entitled
to patents containing the claims listed.

   Patent No. 5,457,410, Benjamin S. Ting, ARCHITECTURE AND INTERCONNECT
SCHEME FOR PROGRAMMABLE LOGIC CIRCUITS, Interference No. 103,833, final
judgment adverse to the patentee rendered July 18, 2000, as to claims 1-40.

   Patent No. 5,147,397, F. Richard Christ, David A. Fencil, Patricia M.
Knight, INTRAOCULAR LENS AND METHOD FOR MAKING SAME, Interference No.
103,435, final judgment adverse to the patentee rendered June 20, 2000, as
to claims 1-17.

   Patent No. 4,899,212, Kiyotaka Kaneko, Izumi Miyake, Kazuya Oda, Yoshio
Nakane, Hiroshi Shimaya, WHITE BALANCE ADJUSTING DEVICE FOR A CAMERA,
Interference No. 103,000, final judgment adverse to the patentee rendered
September 17, 1999, as to claims 1-6.

   Patent No. 5,858,710, Olga Bandman, Surya K. Goli, Lynn E. Murry, TUMOR-
ASSOCIATED KAZAL INHIBITOR-LIKE POLYPEPTIDES AND ENCODING POLYNUCLEOTIDES,
Interference No. 104,434, final judgment adverse to the patentee rendered
January 10, 2001, as to claims 1-9.

   Patent No. 5,496,157, Stephen L. Shoulders, Thomas R. Barito, REVERSE
ROTATION PREVENTION FOR SCROLL COMPRESSORS, Interference No. 104,215,
final judgment adverse to the patentee rendered October 17, 2000, as to
claims 1-9.

   Patent No. 5,255,641, Michael M. Schechter, VARIABLE ENGINE VALVE
CONTROL SYSTEM, Interference No. 103,449, final judgment adverse to the
patentee rendered August 2, 2000, as to claims 1-10.

                                              WANDA M. TIGNER, Sup'v. Legal
                                              Intruments Examiner
                                              Board of Patent Appeals &
                                              Interferences
                                              (703) 308-9797