United States Patent and Trademark Office OG Notices: 03 January 2006
Date Type of Proceeding Issued Case (1) or App'n No. Party/Parties 11-29 OPP 91158854 Vignette (SJ) Corporation v. (R) Steven Marino 11-29 OPP 91165315 Missiontrek Ltd. CANC 92044538 Co. v. Onfolio, (SJ) Inc. 11-30 EX 76498199 Itoya of America, Ltd. Opposer's/ Applicant's/ Petitioner's Respondent's TTAB Mark and Mark and Issue Decision Goods/Services Goods/Services whether Request "VIGNETTE applicant for Recon- EDITORIAL" had a sideration [video bona fide Denied post-production intention (Applicant's services, namely, to use its evidence editing of music mark as of considered videos, TV the and commercials, and application opposer's motion pictures] filing date motion [whether for applicant summary may rely on judgment certain denied) evidence it offered in opposition to motion for summary judgment] 2(d) Opposition "CARTAGIO" "ONFOLIO" and Dismissed [computer software, "ONFOLIO" and namely, internet (and design) Cancellation navigation soft- [both marks for Denied ware, that is, computer software (Motion for internet browsers; for capturing, summary computer hardware organizing and judgment in the nature of sharing on-line granted as database and content] to both computer management cases) equipment; internet research and cost accounting soft- ware; software for hosting computer servers, and user manuals sold as a unit] 2(d) Refusal "XENON" Affirmed [writing pens] Mark and Citable as Goods Cited by Precedent Examining Atty. of TTAB Yes No "XENON" No [paper and cardboard] (1)EX=EX PARTE APPEAL; OPP=OPPOSITION; CANC=CANCELLATION; CU=CONCURRENT USE; (SJ)=SUMMARY JUDGMENT; (R)=REQ. FOR RECONSIDERATION; (MD)=MOTION TO DISMISS; (MR)=MOTION TO REOPEN