August 17, 2010 | US PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE | Print Table of Contents 1357 OG 131 |
August 17, 2010 | Volume 1357 | Number 3 |
CONTENTS
Top of Notices August 17, 2010 | US PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE | Print This Notice 1357 OG 132 |
Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) Information |
Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) Information For information concerning PCT member countries, see the notice appearing in the Official Gazette at 1350 O.G. 73, on January 12, 2010. For information on subject matter under Rule 39 that a particular International Searching Authority will not search, see Annex D of the PCT Applicants' Guide. European Patent Office as Searching and Examining Authority The European Patent Office (EPO) may act as the International Searching Authority (ISA) for an international application filed with the United States Receiving Office or the International Bureau (IB) as Receiving Office where at least one of the applicants is either a national or resident of the United States of America. However, the EPO is no longer a competent ISA, within the meaning of PCT Article 16(3), for international applications filed by U.S. residents or nationals on or after March 1, 2002, in the USPTO or IB as a Receiving Office, and where the application contains one or more claims directed to the field of business methods. For the definition of what the EPO considers to be precluded subject matter in the field of business methods, applicants should see the "Notice from the President of the European Patent Office", dated November 26, 2001, and which was published as Annex A in the "Notice Concerning EPO Competence to Act as PCT Authority" in the Official Gazette at 1255 O.G. 878, on February 19, 2002. The European Patent Office may act as the International Preliminary Examining Authority (IPEA) for an international application filed in the United States Receiving Office or the International Bureau as Receiving Office where at least one of the applicants is either a national or resident of the United States of America, provided that the European Patent Office acted as the International Searching Authority. However, the EPO is no longer a competent IPEA, within the meaning of PCT Article 32(3), for international applications filed by U.S. residents or nationals in the USPTO or IB as a Receiving Office where the corresponding demand is filed with the EPO on or after March 1, 2002, and where the application contains one or more claims directed to the field of business methods. The search fee of the European Patent Office was decreased, effective April 1, 2010, and was announced in the Official Gazette at 1354 O.G. 2, on May 4, 2010. Korean Intellectual Property Office as Searching and Examining Authority For use of the Korean Intellectual Property Office as an International Searching Authority and International Preliminary Examining Authority for international applications filed in the United States Receiving Office, see the notice appearing in the Official Gazette at 1302 O.G. 1261 on January 17, 2006. The search fee of the Korean Intellectual Property Office was increased, effective January 1, 2010, and was announced in the Official Gazette at 1350 O.G. 72, on January 12, 2010. Australian Patent Office as Searching and Examining Authority The Australian Patent Office (IP Australia) may act as the International Searching Authority (ISA) for an international application filed with the United States Receiving Office or the International Bureau (IB) as Receiving Office where at least one of the applicants is either a national or resident of the United States of America. However, IP Australia is not a competent ISA, within the meaning of PCT Artical 16(3), for international applications filed by U.S. residents or nationals in the USPTO or IB as a Receiving Office, and where the application contains one or more claims
August 17, 2010 | US PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE | 1357 OG 133 |
directed to the field of business methods or mechanical inventions. IP Australia may act as the International Preliminary Examining Authority (IPEA) for an international application filed in the United States Receiving Office or the International Bureau as Receiving Office where at least one of the applicants is either a national or resident of the United States of America, provided that IP Australia acted as the International Searching Authority. However, IP Australia is not a competent IPEA, within the meaning of PCT Article 32(3), for international applications filed by U.S. residents or nationals in the USPTO or IB as a Receiving Office where the corresponding demand is filed with IP Australia and where the application contains one or more claims directed to the fields of business methods or mechanical engineering or analogous fields of technology as defined by specified areas of the International Patent Classification System, as indicated in Annex A to the agreement between the USPTO and IP Australia. See the notice appearing in the Official Gazette at 1337 O.G. 261 on December 23, 2008. For use of IP Australia as an International Searching Authority and International Preliminary Examining Authority for international applications filed in the United States Receiving Office, see the notice appearing in the Official Gazette at 1337 O.G. 265 on December 23, 2008. The search fee of IP Australia was increased, effective January 1, 2010, and was announced in the Official Gazette at 1350 O.G. 72, on January 12, 2010. Fees The transmittal fee and search fees for the USPTO were changed, effective January 12, 2009, and were announced in the Federal Register on November 12, 2008. The fee for filing a request for the restoration of the right of priority was established, effective November 9, 2007, and was announced in the Federal Register on September 10, 2007. International filing fees were increased, effective January 1, 2010, and were announced in the Official Gazette at 1350 O.G. 72, on January 12, 2010. The schedule of PCT fees (in U.S. dollars), as of April 1, 2010, is as follows: International Application (PCT Chapter I) fees: Transmittal fee $240.00 Search fee U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) as International Searching Authority (ISA) - Search fee $2,080.00 - Supplemental search fee, per additional invention (payable only upon invitation) $2,080.00 European Patent Office as ISA $2,485.00 Korean Intellectual Property Office as ISA - for international applications filed in English $1,092.00 IP Australia as ISA $1,397.00 International fees International filing fee $1,300.00 International filing fee-filed in paper with PCT EASY zip file or electronically without PCT EASY zip file $1,202.00
August 17, 2010 | US PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE | 1357 OG 134 |
International filing fee-filed electronically with PCT EASY zip files $1,105.00 Supplemental fee for each page over 30 $15.00 Restoration of Priority Filing a request for the restoration of the right of priority under § 1.452 $1,410.00 International Application (PCT Chapter II) fees associated with filing a Demand for Preliminary Examination: Handling fee $195.00 Handling fee-90% reduction, if applicants meet criteria specified at: http://www.wipo.int/pct/en/fees/fee_reduction.pdf $19.50 Preliminary Examination Fee USPTO as International Preliminary Examining Authority (IPEA) - USPTO was ISA in PCT Chapter I $600.00 - USPTO was not ISA in PCT Chapter I $750.00 - Additional preliminary examination fee, per additional invention (payable only upon invitation) $600.00 U.S. National Stage fees (for international applications entering the U.S. national phase under 35 U.S.C. 371) can be found on the USPTO's Web site (www.uspto.gov). April 9, 2010 DAVID J. KAPPOS Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
Top of Notices August 17, 2010 | US PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE | Print This Notice 1357 OG 135 |
Patent Cooperation Treaty Update |
Patent Cooperation Treaty Update The International Bureau of the World Intellectual Property Organization has informed the United States Patent and Trademark Office that an increased dollar amount has been established for the search fee required by the Australian Patent Office (IP Australia) with effect from August 1, 2010. The dollar amount of the search fee required by the Australian Patent Office when acting as an International Searching Authority will be $1,605 beginning August 1, 2010. Patent Cooperation Treaty Update The International Bureau of the World Intellectual Property Organization has informed the United States Patent and Trademark Office, that due to changes in the exchange rate of the U.S. dollar with regard to the Swiss franc, the dollar amounts of certain fees for international applications filed in the United States Receiving Office have been changed, effective September 1, 2010. The amount of these fees will be: International fees International filing fee $1,147.00 International filing fee-filed in paper with PCT EASY zip file or electronically without PCT EASY zip file $1,061.00 International filing fee-filed electronically with PCT EASY zip file $ 974.00 Supplemental fee for each page over 30 $13.00 Patent Cooperation Treaty Update The International Bureau of the World Intellectual Property Organization has informed the United States Patent and Trademark Office that a decreased dollar amount has been established for the search fee required by the European Patent Office (EPO) with effect from September 15, 2010. The dollar amount of the search fee required by the European Patent Office when acting as an International Searching Authority will be $ 2,185 beginning September 15, 2010.
Top of Notices August 17, 2010 | US PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE | Print This Notice 1357 OG 136 |
Notice of Maintenance Fees Payable |
Notice of Maintenance Fees Payable Title 37 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Section 1.362(d) provides that maintenance fees may be paid without surcharge for the six-month period beginning 3, 7, and 11 years after the date of issue of patents based on applications filed on or after Dec. 12, 1980. An additional six-month grace period is provided by 35 U.S.C. 41(b) and 37 CFR 1.362(e) for payment of the maintenance fee with the surcharge set forth in 37 CFR 1.20(h), as amended effective Dec. 16, 1991. If the maintenance fee is not paid in the patent requiring such payment the patent will expire on the 4th, 8th, or 12th anniversary of the grant. Attention is drawn to the patents that were issued on Aug. 7, 2007 for which maintenance fees due at 3 years and six months may now be paid. The patents have patent numbers within the following ranges: Utility Patents 7,251,835 through 7,254,839 Reissue Patents based on the above identified patents. Attention is drawn to the patents that were issued on Aug. 5, 2003 for which maintenance fees due at 7 years and six months may now be paid. The patents have patent numbers within the following ranges: Utility Patents 6,601,239 through 6,604,243 Reissue Patents based on the above identified patents. Attention is drawn to the patents that were issued on Aug. 3, 1999 for which maintenance fees due at 11 years and six months may now be paid. The patents have patent numbers within the following ranges: Utility Patents 5,930,834 through 5,933,861 Reissue Patents based on the above identified patents. No maintenance fees are required for design or plant patents. Payments of maintenance fees in patents may be submitted electronically over the Internet at www.uspto.gov. Click on the "Site Index" link at the top of the homepage (www.uspto.gov), and then scroll down and click on the "Maintenance Fees" link for more information. Payments of maintenance fees in patents not submitted electronically over the Internet should be mailed to "United States Patent and Trademark Office, P.O. Box 979070, St. Louis, MO 63197-9000". Correspondence related to maintenance fees other than payments of maintenance fees in patents is not to be mailed to P.O. Box 979070, St. Louis, MO 63197-9000, but must be mailed to "Mail Stop M Correspondence, Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-1450". Patent owners must establish small entity status according to 37 CFR 1.27 if they have not done so and if they wish to pay the small entity amount. The current amounts of the maintenance fees due at 3 years and six months, 7 years and six months, and 11 years and six months are set forth in the most recently amended provisions in 37 CFR 1.20(e)-(g). To obtain the current maintenance fee amounts, please call the USPTO Contact Center at (800)-786-9199 or see the current USPTO fee schedule posted on the USPTO Internet web site. At the top of the USPTO homepage at www.uspto.gov, click on the "Site Index" link and then scroll down and click on the "Fees, USPTO" link to find the current USPTO fee schedule.
Top of Notices August 17, 2010 | US PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE | Print This Notice 1357 OG 137 |
Notice of Expiration of Patents Due to Failure to Pay Maintenance Fee |
Notice of Expiration of Patents Due to Failure to Pay Maintenance Fee 35 U.S.C. 41 and 37 CFR 1.362(g) provide that if the required maintenance fee and any applicable surcharge are not paid in a patent requiring such payment, the patent will expire at the end of the 4th, 8th or 12th anniversary of the grant of the patent depending on the first maintenance fee which was not paid. According to the records of the Office, the patents listed below have expired due to failure to pay the required maintenance fee and any applicable surcharge. PATENTS WHICH EXPIRED ON June 30, 2010 DUE TO FAILURE TO PAY MAINTENANCE FEES Patent Application Issue Number Number Date 5,771,534 08/514,064 06/30/98 5,771,538 08/871,283 06/30/98 5,771,539 08/714,939 06/30/98 5,771,540 08/785,927 06/30/98 5,771,557 08/754,386 06/30/98 5,771,565 08/782,985 06/30/98 5,771,569 08/777,355 06/30/98 5,771,573 08/417,737 06/30/98 5,771,575 08/753,339 06/30/98 5,771,580 08/703,880 06/30/98 5,771,604 08/834,905 06/30/98 5,771,615 08/624,441 06/30/98 5,771,622 08/382,443 06/30/98 5,771,631 08/741,344 06/30/98 5,771,637 08/808,484 06/30/98 5,771,643 08/437,981 06/30/98 5,771,644 08/672,743 06/30/98 5,771,648 08/474,541 06/30/98 5,771,652 08/683,318 06/30/98 5,771,656 08/659,189 06/30/98 5,771,664 08/747,282 06/30/98 5,771,665 08/763,336 06/30/98 5,771,668 08/700,843 06/30/98 5,771,675 08/682,686 06/30/98 5,771,678 08/598,575 06/30/98 5,771,679 08/760,727 06/30/98 5,771,695 08/021,966 06/30/98 5,771,705 08/712,142 06/30/98 5,771,720 08/622,006 06/30/98 5,771,723 08/610,062 06/30/98 5,771,725 08/687,438 06/30/98 5,771,735 08/789,530 06/30/98 5,771,740 08/897,231 06/30/98 5,771,745 08/641,824 06/30/98 5,771,748 08/592,227 06/30/98 5,771,755 08/604,955 06/30/98 5,771,765 08/824,259 06/30/98 5,771,774 08/728,096 06/30/98 5,771,779 08/728,363 06/30/98 5,771,781 08/901,526 06/30/98 5,771,784 08/901,176 06/30/98 5,771,789 08/915,100 06/30/98 5,771,793 08/651,262 06/30/98 5,771,796 08/740,429 06/30/98 5,771,801 08/547,857 06/30/98 5,771,803 08/714,811 06/30/98 5,771,807 08/748,597 06/30/98
August 17, 2010 | US PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE | 1357 OG 138 |
5,771,808 08/682,749 06/30/98 5,771,809 08/734,625 06/30/98 5,771,817 08/750,880 06/30/98 5,771,823 08/594,855 06/30/98 5,771,825 08/721,315 06/30/98 5,771,833 08/749,116 06/30/98 5,771,838 08/632,553 06/30/98 5,771,856 08/796,025 06/30/98 5,771,858 08/771,917 06/30/98 5,771,860 08/837,728 06/30/98 5,771,864 08/813,901 06/30/98 5,771,866 08/881,770 06/30/98 5,771,869 08/872,538 06/30/98 5,771,873 08/837,679 06/30/98 5,771,874 08/810,999 06/30/98 5,771,891 08/738,183 06/30/98 5,771,894 08/847,838 06/30/98 5,771,916 08/727,775 06/30/98 5,771,917 08/533,612 06/30/98 5,771,925 08/754,404 06/30/98 5,771,926 08/553,105 06/30/98 5,771,929 08/736,508 06/30/98 5,771,932 08/550,568 06/30/98 5,771,936 08/506,882 06/30/98 5,771,937 08/766,716 06/30/98 5,771,939 08/603,100 06/30/98 5,771,946 08/664,570 06/30/98 5,771,949 08/659,684 06/30/98 5,771,954 08/660,040 06/30/98 5,771,956 08/672,268 06/30/98 5,771,959 08/310,710 06/30/98 5,771,961 08/511,037 06/30/98 5,771,962 08/627,871 06/30/98 5,771,965 08/757,093 06/30/98 5,771,979 08/699,919 06/30/98 5,771,985 08/728,285 06/30/98 5,771,991 08/502,350 06/30/98 5,771,993 08/665,088 06/30/98 5,771,997 08/562,962 06/30/98 5,771,999 08/688,396 06/30/98 5,772,008 08/676,457 06/30/98 5,772,013 08/749,092 06/30/98 5,772,015 08/805,832 06/30/98 5,772,020 08/776,766 06/30/98 5,772,024 08/755,492 06/30/98 5,772,030 08/823,401 06/30/98 5,772,032 08/965,831 06/30/98 5,772,039 08/764,682 06/30/98 5,772,043 08/516,347 06/30/98 5,772,044 08/508,459 06/30/98 5,772,055 08/735,078 06/30/98 5,772,058 08/810,147 06/30/98 5,772,060 08/836,751 06/30/98 5,772,064 08/761,157 06/30/98 5,772,072 08/626,301 06/30/98 5,772,076 08/686,644 06/30/98 5,772,079 08/645,069 06/30/98 5,772,091 08/838,441 06/30/98 5,772,098 08/623,750 06/30/98 5,772,101 08/693,916 06/30/98 5,772,104 08/703,021 06/30/98 5,772,121 08/910,397 06/30/98 5,772,131 08/776,334 06/30/98 5,772,132 08/700,872 06/30/98 5,772,136 08/729,209 06/30/98 5,772,137 08/731,440 06/30/98
August 17, 2010 | US PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE | 1357 OG 139 |
5,772,140 08/808,966 06/30/98 5,772,141 08/848,201 06/30/98 5,772,143 08/605,244 06/30/98 5,772,147 08/505,490 06/30/98 5,772,155 08/856,844 06/30/98 5,772,158 08/759,265 06/30/98 5,772,159 08/705,648 06/30/98 5,772,166 08/593,828 06/30/98 5,772,168 08/563,046 06/30/98 5,772,177 08/840,122 06/30/98 5,772,180 08/784,697 06/30/98 5,772,189 08/905,335 06/30/98 5,772,190 08/739,063 06/30/98 5,772,191 08/760,419 06/30/98 5,772,222 08/517,644 06/30/98 5,772,223 08/665,717 06/30/98 5,772,229 08/667,505 06/30/98 5,772,237 08/744,204 06/30/98 5,772,239 08/669,616 06/30/98 5,772,243 08/916,558 06/30/98 5,772,244 08/727,929 06/30/98 5,772,251 08/730,228 06/30/98 5,772,261 08/505,807 06/30/98 5,772,265 08/139,574 06/30/98 5,772,268 08/544,025 06/30/98 5,772,269 08/728,028 06/30/98 5,772,274 08/381,505 06/30/98 5,772,275 08/714,007 06/30/98 5,772,285 08/752,849 06/30/98 5,772,287 08/686,975 06/30/98 5,772,290 08/578,633 06/30/98 5,772,296 08/750,519 06/30/98 5,772,301 08/526,958 06/30/98 5,772,315 08/955,927 06/30/98 5,772,318 08/412,080 06/30/98 5,772,321 08/548,037 06/30/98 5,772,328 08/667,058 06/30/98 5,772,332 08/666,279 06/30/98 5,772,333 08/892,847 06/30/98 5,772,334 08/732,269 06/30/98 5,772,335 08/828,979 06/30/98 5,772,339 08/867,426 06/30/98 5,772,340 08/507,517 06/30/98 5,772,342 08/514,094 06/30/98 5,772,345 08/466,837 06/30/98 5,772,347 08/568,324 06/30/98 5,772,358 08/648,663 06/30/98 5,772,361 08/615,344 06/30/98 5,772,362 08/613,961 06/30/98 5,772,368 08/425,184 06/30/98 5,772,369 08/370,572 06/30/98 5,772,370 08/561,926 06/30/98 5,772,373 08/560,629 06/30/98 5,772,376 08/776,732 06/30/98 5,772,380 08/771,104 06/30/98 5,772,383 08/729,348 06/30/98 5,772,384 08/284,675 06/30/98 5,772,387 08/497,223 06/30/98 5,772,388 08/654,236 06/30/98 5,772,392 08/699,985 06/30/98 5,772,396 08/695,660 06/30/98 5,772,413 08/816,535 06/30/98 5,772,416 08/801,673 06/30/98 5,772,418 08/626,017 06/30/98 5,772,432 08/733,588 06/30/98 5,772,437 08/507,257 06/30/98
August 17, 2010 | US PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE | 1357 OG 140 |
5,772,439 08/624,871 06/30/98 5,772,444 08/799,229 06/30/98 5,772,450 08/685,168 06/30/98 5,772,453 08/720,807 06/30/98 5,772,470 08/761,241 06/30/98 5,772,471 08/846,604 06/30/98 5,772,473 08/778,029 06/30/98 5,772,476 08/776,608 06/30/98 5,772,478 08/765,008 06/30/98 5,772,479 08/644,508 06/30/98 5,772,480 08/898,246 06/30/98 5,772,481 08/718,917 06/30/98 5,772,495 08/713,487 06/30/98 5,772,497 08/712,124 06/30/98 5,772,498 08/799,243 06/30/98 5,772,511 08/647,400 06/30/98 5,772,519 08/642,938 06/30/98 5,772,526 08/743,112 06/30/98 5,772,527 08/846,487 06/30/98 5,772,530 08/771,414 06/30/98 5,772,531 08/813,068 06/30/98 5,772,536 08/802,172 06/30/98 5,772,555 08/760,146 06/30/98 5,772,557 08/780,156 06/30/98 5,772,572 08/843,749 06/30/98 5,772,585 08/706,316 06/30/98 5,772,592 08/587,108 06/30/98 5,772,593 08/678,265 06/30/98 5,772,600 08/665,362 06/30/98 5,772,601 08/703,360 06/30/98 5,772,602 08/747,896 06/30/98 5,772,603 08/867,959 06/30/98 5,772,605 08/768,686 06/30/98 5,772,606 08/397,953 06/30/98 5,772,607 08/471,274 06/30/98 5,772,614 08/674,396 06/30/98 5,772,622 08/715,003 06/30/98 5,772,627 08/684,425 06/30/98 5,772,634 08/539,446 06/30/98 5,772,640 08/583,239 06/30/98 5,772,654 08/555,636 06/30/98 5,772,662 08/761,476 06/30/98 5,772,666 08/570,564 06/30/98 5,772,678 08/546,015 06/30/98 5,772,685 08/764,600 06/30/98 5,772,690 08/738,953 06/30/98 5,772,698 08/635,812 06/30/98 5,772,700 08/885,797 06/30/98 5,772,707 08/673,085 06/30/98 5,772,713 08/655,601 06/30/98 5,772,714 08/682,962 06/30/98 5,772,724 08/724,894 06/30/98 5,772,726 08/727,124 06/30/98 5,772,737 08/827,055 06/30/98 5,772,738 08/657,935 06/30/98 5,772,747 08/747,996 06/30/98 5,772,748 08/575,215 06/30/98 5,772,756 08/770,685 06/30/98 5,772,765 08/737,257 06/30/98 5,772,768 08/523,118 06/30/98 5,772,773 08/650,198 06/30/98 5,772,796 08/560,888 06/30/98 5,772,797 08/775,518 06/30/98 5,772,798 08/823,941 06/30/98 5,772,807 08/715,264 06/30/98 5,772,809 08/760,597 06/30/98
August 17, 2010 | US PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE | 1357 OG 141 |
5,772,811 08/662,497 06/30/98 5,772,813 08/678,142 06/30/98 5,772,819 08/487,631 06/30/98 5,772,826 08/703,030 06/30/98 5,772,830 08/398,609 06/30/98 5,772,839 08/591,400 06/30/98 5,772,840 08/578,021 06/30/98 5,772,852 08/499,101 06/30/98 5,772,855 08/843,897 06/30/98 5,772,861 08/541,201 06/30/98 5,772,862 08/429,845 06/30/98 5,772,867 08/815,610 06/30/98 5,772,872 08/824,828 06/30/98 5,772,875 08/750,329 06/30/98 5,772,883 08/638,453 06/30/98 5,772,887 08/827,244 06/30/98 5,772,898 08/850,405 06/30/98 5,772,902 08/630,263 06/30/98 5,772,907 08/646,537 06/30/98 5,772,911 08/852,311 06/30/98 5,772,914 08/746,943 06/30/98 5,772,920 08/679,840 06/30/98 5,772,924 08/806,501 06/30/98 5,772,932 08/688,245 06/30/98 5,772,936 08/385,409 06/30/98 5,772,947 08/473,829 06/30/98 5,772,966 08/789,220 06/30/98 5,772,972 08/715,254 06/30/98 5,772,976 08/944,589 06/30/98 5,772,979 08/693,104 06/30/98 5,772,986 08/629,357 06/30/98 5,772,987 08/725,494 06/30/98 5,772,992 08/191,973 06/30/98 5,772,993 08/785,088 06/30/98 5,773,004 08/550,078 06/30/98 5,773,006 08/418,664 06/30/98 5,773,029 08/722,220 06/30/98 5,773,031 08/608,839 06/30/98 5,773,033 08/636,247 06/30/98 5,773,034 08/887,605 06/30/98 5,773,036 08/549,859 06/30/98 5,773,037 08/738,602 06/30/98 5,773,039 08/626,006 06/30/98 5,773,040 08/866,115 06/30/98 5,773,046 08/706,005 06/30/98 5,773,050 08/632,465 06/30/98 5,773,051 08/680,121 06/30/98 5,773,052 08/426,016 06/30/98 5,773,059 08/588,447 06/30/98 5,773,065 08/617,802 06/30/98 5,773,071 08/895,152 06/30/98 5,773,072 08/563,490 06/30/98 5,773,079 08/461,369 06/30/98 5,773,081 08/903,665 06/30/98 5,773,082 08/783,906 06/30/98 5,773,086 08/694,435 06/30/98 5,773,087 08/695,212 06/30/98 5,773,091 08/680,265 06/30/98 5,773,094 08/693,129 06/30/98 5,773,100 08/746,178 06/30/98 5,773,101 08/157,826 06/30/98 5,773,107 08/798,721 06/30/98 5,773,109 08/663,185 06/30/98 5,773,111 08/608,797 06/30/98 5,773,115 08/956,201 06/30/98 5,773,117 08/564,267 06/30/98
August 17, 2010 | US PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE | 1357 OG 142 |
5,773,121 08/769,792 06/30/98 5,773,125 08/575,501 06/30/98 5,773,128 08/520,486 06/30/98 5,773,134 08/742,322 06/30/98 5,773,141 08/666,055 06/30/98 5,773,142 07/803,443 06/30/98 5,773,143 08/640,642 06/30/98 5,773,144 08/548,635 06/30/98 5,773,146 08/463,909 06/30/98 5,773,149 08/684,146 06/30/98 5,773,150 08/560,478 06/30/98 5,773,156 08/591,350 06/30/98 5,773,179 08/894,616 06/30/98 5,773,180 08/663,812 06/30/98 5,773,182 08/465,393 06/30/98 5,773,186 08/801,948 06/30/98 5,773,188 08/844,611 06/30/98 5,773,190 08/795,266 06/30/98 5,773,191 08/685,850 06/30/98 5,773,192 08/794,587 06/30/98 5,773,193 08/734,430 06/30/98 5,773,198 08/660,384 06/30/98 5,773,212 08/734,435 06/30/98 5,773,215 08/405,648 06/30/98 5,773,217 08/455,981 06/30/98 5,773,219 08/611,330 06/30/98 5,773,221 08/766,308 06/30/98 5,773,225 08/248,357 06/30/98 5,773,228 08/460,808 06/30/98 5,773,230 08/469,081 06/30/98 5,773,233 08/738,654 06/30/98 5,773,235 08/676,169 06/30/98 5,773,239 08/568,127 06/30/98 5,773,247 08/491,845 06/30/98 5,773,252 08/462,169 06/30/98 5,773,276 08/542,071 06/30/98 5,773,300 08/842,150 06/30/98 5,773,306 08/652,928 06/30/98 5,773,309 08/511,937 06/30/98 5,773,319 08/842,960 06/30/98 5,773,321 08/766,874 06/30/98 5,773,332 08/799,799 06/30/98 5,773,340 08/563,335 06/30/98 5,773,344 08/646,993 06/30/98 5,773,345 08/418,676 06/30/98 5,773,348 08/859,754 06/30/98 5,773,349 08/664,861 06/30/98 5,773,353 08/564,505 06/30/98 5,773,366 08/659,884 06/30/98 5,773,373 08/668,965 06/30/98 5,773,376 08/676,221 06/30/98 5,773,389 08/381,596 06/30/98 5,773,393 08/877,090 06/30/98 5,773,404 08/722,023 06/30/98 5,773,407 08/722,589 06/30/98 5,773,410 08/506,356 06/30/98 5,773,411 08/338,977 06/30/98 5,773,415 08/776,026 06/30/98 5,773,418 08/975,095 06/30/98 5,773,419 08/398,600 06/30/98 5,773,425 08/463,202 06/30/98 5,773,426 08/660,405 06/30/98 5,773,433 08/817,989 06/30/98 5,773,448 08/833,239 06/30/98 5,773,450 08/167,881 06/30/98 5,773,455 08/672,474 06/30/98
August 17, 2010 | US PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE | 1357 OG 143 |
5,773,459 08/486,816 06/30/98 5,773,462 08/668,284 06/30/98 5,773,467 08/761,102 06/30/98 5,773,474 08/485,620 06/30/98 5,773,480 08/768,615 06/30/98 5,773,482 08/809,959 06/30/98 5,773,490 08/605,584 06/30/98 5,773,497 08/704,748 06/30/98 5,773,501 08/762,850 06/30/98 5,773,502 08/950,092 06/30/98 5,773,504 08/827,767 06/30/98 5,773,508 08/535,581 06/30/98 5,773,510 08/413,645 06/30/98 5,773,511 08/560,618 06/30/98 5,773,512 08/663,148 06/30/98 5,773,515 08/296,293 06/30/98 5,773,522 08/448,330 06/30/98 5,773,523 08/574,567 06/30/98 5,773,531 08/920,697 06/30/98 5,773,561 08/692,033 06/30/98 5,773,564 08/596,439 06/30/98 5,773,567 08/663,465 06/30/98 5,773,571 08/595,387 06/30/98 5,773,573 08/461,564 06/30/98 5,773,583 08/466,344 06/30/98 5,773,585 08/667,357 06/30/98 5,773,590 08/835,779 06/30/98 5,773,593 08/769,701 06/30/98 5,773,594 08/667,663 06/30/98 5,773,609 08/801,831 06/30/98 5,773,612 08/640,080 06/30/98 5,773,616 08/463,759 06/30/98 5,773,617 08/532,630 06/30/98 5,773,619 08/439,616 06/30/98 5,773,620 08/482,546 06/30/98 5,773,635 08/498,840 06/30/98 5,773,637 08/708,997 06/30/98 5,773,638 08/858,018 06/30/98 5,773,640 08/737,138 06/30/98 5,773,644 08/825,040 06/30/98 5,773,646 08/825,086 06/30/98 5,773,653 08/750,089 06/30/98 5,773,659 08/682,588 06/30/98 5,773,660 08/784,548 06/30/98 5,773,665 08/683,593 06/30/98 5,773,667 08/856,212 06/30/98 5,773,673 08/886,427 06/30/98 5,773,688 08/418,444 06/30/98 5,773,692 08/570,929 06/30/98 5,773,694 08/591,498 06/30/98 5,773,698 08/657,175 06/30/98 5,773,700 08/764,100 06/30/98 5,773,705 08/450,834 06/30/98 5,773,712 08/809,109 06/30/98 5,773,719 08/738,284 06/30/98 5,773,720 08/790,283 06/30/98 5,773,724 08/621,832 06/30/98 5,773,726 08/658,147 06/30/98 5,773,731 08/652,273 06/30/98 5,773,736 08/901,046 06/30/98 5,773,741 08/715,978 06/30/98 5,773,744 08/722,361 06/30/98 5,773,745 08/744,412 06/30/98 5,773,746 08/787,247 06/30/98 5,773,748 08/490,407 06/30/98 5,773,758 08/666,487 06/30/98
August 17, 2010 | US PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE | 1357 OG 144 |
5,773,759 08/762,363 06/30/98 5,773,762 08/628,035 06/30/98 5,773,766 08/803,102 06/30/98 5,773,770 08/872,814 06/30/98 5,773,774 08/643,017 06/30/98 5,773,776 08/733,948 06/30/98 5,773,779 08/950,408 06/30/98 5,773,791 08/706,787 06/30/98 5,773,793 08/645,703 06/30/98 5,773,795 08/542,637 06/30/98 5,773,805 08/748,899 06/30/98 5,773,808 08/650,925 06/30/98 5,773,824 08/841,538 06/30/98 5,773,828 08/606,071 06/30/98 5,773,837 08/871,939 06/30/98 5,773,838 08/871,971 06/30/98 5,773,842 08/567,579 06/30/98 5,773,843 08/605,554 06/30/98 5,773,844 08/691,609 06/30/98 5,773,850 08/852,283 06/30/98 5,773,853 08/701,666 06/30/98 5,773,873 08/614,254 06/30/98 5,773,877 08/796,991 06/30/98 5,773,879 08/015,007 06/30/98 5,773,884 08/811,070 06/30/98 5,773,889 08/710,840 06/30/98 5,773,894 08/769,182 06/30/98 5,773,900 08/793,285 06/30/98 5,773,903 08/770,919 06/30/98 5,773,904 08/505,340 06/30/98 5,773,905 08/430,847 06/30/98 5,773,918 08/488,279 06/30/98 5,773,922 08/565,545 06/30/98 5,773,923 08/738,285 06/30/98 5,773,924 08/691,560 06/30/98 5,773,944 08/766,463 06/30/98 5,773,947 08/437,876 06/30/98 5,773,949 08/682,729 06/30/98 5,773,950 08/307,662 06/30/98 5,773,957 08/783,143 06/30/98 5,773,977 08/634,650 06/30/98 5,773,981 08/708,194 06/30/98 5,773,982 08/730,340 06/30/98 5,773,985 08/658,745 06/30/98 5,773,988 08/741,151 06/30/98 5,773,995 08/636,084 06/30/98 5,773,996 08/650,251 06/30/98 5,774,004 08/824,335 06/30/98 5,774,007 08/730,933 06/30/98 5,774,010 08/798,637 06/30/98 5,774,011 08/864,254 06/30/98 5,774,015 08/572,019 06/30/98 5,774,027 08/701,462 06/30/98 5,774,034 08/706,349 06/30/98 5,774,039 08/231,615 06/30/98 5,774,044 08/764,021 06/30/98 5,774,046 08/863,526 06/30/98 5,774,047 08/631,463 06/30/98 5,774,048 08/307,776 06/30/98 5,774,052 08/598,338 06/30/98 5,774,053 08/643,038 06/30/98 5,774,056 08/655,396 06/30/98 5,774,062 08/450,623 06/30/98 5,774,064 08/751,588 06/30/98 5,774,066 08/639,227 06/30/98 5,774,073 08/466,191 06/30/98
August 17, 2010 | US PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE | 1357 OG 145 |
5,774,075 08/706,170 06/30/98 5,774,085 08/916,718 06/30/98 5,774,089 08/816,639 06/30/98 5,774,096 08/426,168 06/30/98 5,774,100 08/721,620 06/30/98 5,774,107 08/733,188 06/30/98 5,774,117 08/535,628 06/30/98 5,774,118 08/517,684 06/30/98 5,774,124 08/549,361 06/30/98 5,774,134 08/874,579 06/30/98 5,774,145 08/635,628 06/30/98 5,774,147 08/170,633 06/30/98 5,774,152 08/631,091 06/30/98 5,774,162 08/650,548 06/30/98 5,774,167 08/596,446 06/30/98 5,774,187 08/907,911 06/30/98 5,774,188 08/585,404 06/30/98 5,774,190 08/733,821 06/30/98 5,774,195 08/967,503 06/30/98 5,774,196 08/662,545 06/30/98 5,774,199 08/621,834 06/30/98 5,774,207 08/671,482 06/30/98 5,774,212 08/821,676 06/30/98 5,774,217 08/734,265 06/30/98 5,774,222 08/539,886 06/30/98 5,774,227 08/790,034 06/30/98 5,774,229 08/489,008 06/30/98 5,774,237 08/500,095 06/30/98 5,774,250 08/839,156 06/30/98 5,774,252 08/635,055 06/30/98 5,774,257 08/734,195 06/30/98 5,774,274 08/439,942 06/30/98 5,774,278 08/565,327 06/30/98 5,774,281 08/597,978 06/30/98 5,774,282 08/689,048 06/30/98 5,774,286 08/691,428 06/30/98 5,774,288 08/587,530 06/30/98 5,774,289 08/752,825 06/30/98 5,774,291 08/623,449 06/30/98 5,774,303 08/409,698 06/30/98 5,774,312 08/736,606 06/30/98 5,774,331 08/944,219 06/30/98 5,774,333 08/708,093 06/30/98 5,774,336 08/712,950 06/30/98 5,774,338 08/717,410 06/30/98 5,774,339 08/759,002 06/30/98 5,774,341 08/575,652 06/30/98 5,774,362 08/609,977 06/30/98 5,774,363 08/484,330 06/30/98 5,774,364 08/702,162 06/30/98 5,774,366 08/767,287 06/30/98 5,774,377 07/737,621 06/30/98 5,774,381 07/845,971 06/30/98 5,774,386 08/633,332 06/30/98 5,774,389 08/701,327 06/30/98 5,774,402 08/697,356 06/30/98 5,774,403 08/873,854 06/30/98 5,774,405 08/734,334 06/30/98 5,774,409 08/797,081 06/30/98 5,774,411 08/712,537 06/30/98 5,774,415 08/761,456 06/30/98 5,774,417 08/738,026 06/30/98 5,774,428 08/671,898 06/30/98 5,774,437 08/798,056 06/30/98 5,774,443 08/771,315 06/30/98 5,774,444 08/533,991 06/30/98
August 17, 2010 | US PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE | 1357 OG 146 |
5,774,447 08/755,085 06/30/98 5,774,448 08/756,197 06/30/98 5,774,449 08/415,054 06/30/98 5,774,454 08/562,885 06/30/98 5,774,462 08/907,777 06/30/98 5,774,464 08/744,333 06/30/98 5,774,468 08/553,025 06/30/98 5,774,470 08/524,040 06/30/98 5,774,475 08/760,979 06/30/98 5,774,478 08/619,794 06/30/98 5,774,486 08/641,256 06/30/98 5,774,491 08/675,999 06/30/98 5,774,495 08/619,169 06/30/98 5,774,501 08/547,394 06/30/98 5,774,515 08/559,339 06/30/98 5,774,528 08/846,024 06/30/98 5,774,534 08/877,894 06/30/98 5,774,538 08/534,143 06/30/98 5,774,539 08/652,398 06/30/98 5,774,550 08/882,929 06/30/98 5,774,557 08/506,365 06/30/98 5,774,559 08/790,872 06/30/98 5,774,563 08/680,274 06/30/98 5,774,574 08/563,684 06/30/98 5,774,578 08/617,360 06/30/98 5,774,589 08/525,030 06/30/98 5,774,604 08/735,630 06/30/98 5,774,623 08/629,900 06/30/98 5,774,627 08/594,161 06/30/98 5,774,633 07/613,718 06/30/98 5,774,639 08/390,616 06/30/98 5,774,647 08/649,752 06/30/98 5,774,657 08/713,572 06/30/98 5,774,665 08/696,091 06/30/98 5,774,675 08/644,392 06/30/98 5,774,681 08/694,676 06/30/98 5,774,685 08/426,502 06/30/98 5,774,687 08/483,064 06/30/98 5,774,688 08/375,697 06/30/98 5,774,731 08/676,053 06/30/98 5,774,734 08/753,262 06/30/98 5,774,737 08/745,336 06/30/98 5,774,747 08/833,004 06/30/98 5,774,748 08/653,369 06/30/98 5,774,749 08/484,620 06/30/98 5,774,753 08/901,241 06/30/98 5,774,756 08/909,602 06/30/98 5,774,757 08/909,926 06/30/98 5,774,760 08/572,175 06/30/98 5,774,763 08/893,983 06/30/98 5,774,770 08/786,652 06/30/98 5,774,778 08/899,315 06/30/98 5,774,779 08/743,731 06/30/98 5,774,794 08/420,406 06/30/98 5,774,795 08/503,091 06/30/98 5,774,797 08/532,275 06/30/98 5,774,803 08/661,010 06/30/98 5,774,818 08/582,973 06/30/98 5,774,819 08/485,484 06/30/98 5,774,826 08/565,589 06/30/98 5,774,830 08/586,316 06/30/98 5,774,835 08/517,357 06/30/98 5,774,838 08/536,362 06/30/98 5,774,841 08/536,302 06/30/98 5,774,853 08/874,442 06/30/98 5,774,867 08/037,983 06/30/98
August 17, 2010 | US PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE | 1357 OG 147 |
5,774,883 08/450,124 06/30/98 5,774,888 08/778,212 06/30/98 PATENTS WHICH EXPIRED ON June 25, 2010 DUE TO FAILURE TO PAY MAINTENANCE FEES Patent Application Issue Number Number Date 6,408,439 09/863,206 06/25/02 6,408,441 09/562,527 06/25/02 6,408,443 09/836,328 06/25/02 6,408,453 09/865,789 06/25/02 6,408,457 09/807,379 06/25/02 6,408,459 09/744,319 06/25/02 6,408,460 09/743,291 06/25/02 6,408,463 09/665,135 06/25/02 6,408,465 09/702,970 06/25/02 6,408,470 09/481,700 06/25/02 6,408,473 09/142,393 06/25/02 6,408,486 09/647,312 06/25/02 6,408,488 09/983,607 06/25/02 6,408,490 09/600,613 06/25/02 6,408,497 09/426,170 06/25/02 6,408,499 09/456,735 06/25/02 6,408,500 09/662,735 06/25/02 6,408,503 09/422,704 06/25/02 6,408,506 09/795,597 06/25/02 6,408,507 09/715,627 06/25/02 6,408,515 09/137,326 06/25/02 6,408,516 09/385,314 06/25/02 6,408,520 09/574,893 06/25/02 6,408,524 09/594,728 06/25/02 6,408,525 09/670,233 06/25/02 6,408,539 09/580,262 06/25/02 6,408,545 09/688,648 06/25/02 6,408,551 09/581,815 06/25/02 6,408,558 09/706,892 06/25/02 6,408,565 09/523,009 06/25/02 6,408,567 09/802,771 06/25/02 6,408,575 09/537,512 06/25/02 6,408,577 09/594,923 06/25/02 6,408,582 09/559,576 06/25/02 6,408,587 09/746,586 06/25/02 6,408,590 09/140,049 06/25/02 6,408,592 09/665,155 06/25/02 6,408,596 09/545,256 06/25/02 6,408,606 09/765,708 06/25/02 6,408,614 09/037,952 06/25/02 6,408,617 09/983,476 06/25/02 6,408,630 09/756,896 06/25/02 6,408,637 09/430,842 06/25/02 6,408,644 09/643,015 06/25/02 6,408,647 09/440,009 06/25/02 6,408,653 09/344,365 06/25/02 6,408,657 09/783,882 06/25/02 6,408,676 09/282,381 06/25/02 6,408,679 09/498,440 06/25/02 6,408,680 09/171,717 06/25/02 6,408,681 09/533,956 06/25/02 6,408,698 09/387,543 06/25/02 6,408,706 09/554,620 06/25/02 6,408,708 09/636,018 06/25/02 6,408,724 08/618,263 06/25/02 6,408,726 08/894,129 06/25/02 6,408,732 08/153,623 06/25/02
August 17, 2010 | US PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE | 1357 OG 148 |
6,408,736 09/615,428 06/25/02 6,408,739 09/650,921 06/25/02 6,408,740 09/729,475 06/25/02 6,408,746 09/744,234 06/25/02 6,408,749 09/428,182 06/25/02 6,408,755 09/638,877 06/25/02 6,408,764 09/664,069 06/25/02 6,408,769 09/775,985 06/25/02 6,408,775 09/815,322 06/25/02 6,408,779 09/970,384 06/25/02 6,408,785 09/577,553 06/25/02 6,408,794 09/693,156 06/25/02 6,408,795 09/820,161 06/25/02 6,408,797 09/825,396 06/25/02 6,408,798 09/775,438 06/25/02 6,408,801 09/558,624 06/25/02 6,408,813 09/552,270 06/25/02 6,408,815 09/681,701 06/25/02 6,408,817 09/781,193 06/25/02 6,408,821 09/740,533 06/25/02 6,408,822 09/647,243 06/25/02 6,408,825 09/985,854 06/25/02 6,408,828 09/611,779 06/25/02 6,408,844 09/719,080 06/25/02 6,408,847 09/652,110 06/25/02 6,408,849 09/336,060 06/25/02 6,408,851 09/411,349 06/25/02 6,408,853 09/891,468 06/25/02 6,408,860 09/668,104 06/25/02 6,408,865 09/659,910 06/25/02 6,408,874 09/367,655 06/25/02 6,408,886 09/922,569 06/25/02 6,408,888 09/538,462 06/25/02 6,408,893 09/939,336 06/25/02 6,408,901 09/804,731 06/25/02 6,408,902 09/881,069 06/25/02 6,408,903 09/706,457 06/25/02 6,408,907 09/902,368 06/25/02 6,408,908 09/463,842 06/25/02 6,408,912 09/905,314 06/25/02 6,408,913 09/252,061 06/25/02 6,408,915 09/506,933 06/25/02 6,408,918 09/694,719 06/25/02 6,408,921 09/570,833 06/25/02 6,408,927 09/294,763 06/25/02 6,408,929 09/849,045 06/25/02 6,408,930 09/392,051 06/25/02 6,408,935 09/639,165 06/25/02 6,408,949 09/530,646 06/25/02 6,408,962 09/556,846 06/25/02 6,408,964 09/732,753 06/25/02 6,408,965 09/737,522 06/25/02 6,408,966 09/120,801 06/25/02 6,408,971 09/638,449 06/25/02 6,408,972 09/715,659 06/25/02 6,408,973 09/696,175 06/25/02 6,408,981 09/670,678 06/25/02 6,408,983 09/655,323 06/25/02 6,408,991 09/452,305 06/25/02 6,408,994 10/032,487 06/25/02 6,408,995 09/777,041 06/25/02 6,408,996 09/661,951 06/25/02 6,408,997 09/789,088 06/25/02 6,408,998 09/840,064 06/25/02 6,409,005 09/630,954 06/25/02 6,409,009 09/610,037 06/25/02
August 17, 2010 | US PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE | 1357 OG 149 |
6,409,013 09/708,818 06/25/02 6,409,019 09/466,142 06/25/02 6,409,020 09/631,578 06/25/02 6,409,021 09/639,594 06/25/02 6,409,023 09/696,182 06/25/02 6,409,025 09/792,086 06/25/02 6,409,031 09/653,106 06/25/02 6,409,036 09/765,627 06/25/02 6,409,037 09/984,690 06/25/02 6,409,039 09/813,649 06/25/02 6,409,042 09/472,356 06/25/02 6,409,047 09/874,584 06/25/02 6,409,061 09/638,117 06/25/02 6,409,073 09/743,739 06/25/02 6,409,091 09/496,678 06/25/02 6,409,092 09/479,932 06/25/02 6,409,093 09/761,071 06/25/02 6,409,105 09/377,083 06/25/02 6,409,108 09/747,853 06/25/02 6,409,109 09/468,942 06/25/02 6,409,112 09/650,617 06/25/02 6,409,114 09/581,693 06/25/02 6,409,116 09/698,408 06/25/02 6,409,120 09/537,275 06/25/02 6,409,121 09/652,589 06/25/02 6,409,125 09/568,006 06/25/02 6,409,142 09/857,446 06/25/02 6,409,146 09/486,170 06/25/02 6,409,148 09/642,605 06/25/02 6,409,151 09/942,229 06/25/02 6,409,153 09/853,549 06/25/02 6,409,168 09/582,124 06/25/02 6,409,169 09/423,088 06/25/02 6,409,171 09/111,940 06/25/02 6,409,181 09/619,706 06/25/02 6,409,182 09/564,482 06/25/02 6,409,184 09/935,326 06/25/02 6,409,185 09/409,133 06/25/02 6,409,186 09/240,996 06/25/02 6,409,188 09/495,958 06/25/02 6,409,191 09/688,284 06/25/02 6,409,192 09/635,581 06/25/02 6,409,195 09/808,563 06/25/02 6,409,196 09/444,397 06/25/02 6,409,200 09/756,517 06/25/02 6,409,203 09/705,622 06/25/02 6,409,204 09/573,570 06/25/02 6,409,207 09/686,857 06/25/02 6,409,208 09/675,605 06/25/02 6,409,211 09/685,395 06/25/02 6,409,217 09/670,875 06/25/02 6,409,222 09/590,544 06/25/02 6,409,244 09/738,861 06/25/02 6,409,245 09/920,129 06/25/02 6,409,248 09/651,951 06/25/02 6,409,249 09/679,942 06/25/02 6,409,251 09/320,993 06/25/02 6,409,257 09/973,707 06/25/02 6,409,259 09/545,943 06/25/02 6,409,260 09/673,363 06/25/02 6,409,264 09/516,696 06/25/02 6,409,265 09/583,852 06/25/02 6,409,270 09/445,674 06/25/02 6,409,273 09/884,819 06/25/02 6,409,274 09/629,753 06/25/02 6,409,280 09/853,764 06/25/02
August 17, 2010 | US PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE | 1357 OG 150 |
6,409,282 09/996,961 06/25/02 6,409,285 09/527,673 06/25/02 6,409,287 09/643,961 06/25/02 6,409,296 09/624,380 06/25/02 6,409,299 09/218,093 06/25/02 6,409,306 09/484,916 06/25/02 6,409,310 09/331,061 06/25/02 6,409,334 09/650,129 06/25/02 6,409,337 09/802,774 06/25/02 6,409,338 09/669,510 06/25/02 6,409,353 09/899,574 06/25/02 6,409,354 09/916,777 06/25/02 6,409,358 09/612,088 06/25/02 6,409,359 09/613,198 06/25/02 6,409,360 09/759,090 06/25/02 6,409,361 09/528,503 06/25/02 6,409,370 09/507,684 06/25/02 6,409,371 09/919,010 06/25/02 6,409,376 09/562,167 06/25/02 6,409,379 09/542,077 06/25/02 6,409,399 09/745,720 06/25/02 6,409,408 09/771,053 06/25/02 6,409,418 09/563,320 06/25/02 6,409,419 09/693,874 06/25/02 6,409,424 09/592,773 06/25/02 6,409,433 09/492,393 06/25/02 6,409,436 09/929,689 06/25/02 6,409,437 09/687,164 06/25/02 6,409,438 09/399,999 06/25/02 6,409,441 09/937,170 06/25/02 6,409,443 09/699,758 06/25/02 6,409,445 09/769,042 06/25/02 6,409,449 09/424,284 06/25/02 6,409,452 09/614,352 06/25/02 6,409,455 09/511,297 06/25/02 6,409,458 09/563,774 06/25/02 6,409,468 09/647,466 06/25/02 6,409,473 09/604,386 06/25/02 6,409,482 09/661,149 06/25/02 6,409,483 09/767,735 06/25/02 6,409,484 09/623,009 06/25/02 6,409,491 09/775,452 06/25/02 6,409,496 09/654,000 06/25/02 6,409,499 09/379,409 06/25/02 6,409,500 09/841,620 06/25/02 6,409,509 09/769,301 06/25/02 6,409,510 09/808,478 06/25/02 6,409,519 10/020,878 06/25/02 6,409,520 09/919,431 06/25/02 6,409,523 09/891,657 06/25/02 6,409,534 09/756,160 06/25/02 6,409,538 09/724,790 06/25/02 6,409,541 09/984,919 06/25/02 6,409,556 09/776,972 06/25/02 6,409,567 09/250,774 06/25/02 6,409,568 09/807,671 06/25/02 6,409,572 09/983,788 06/25/02 6,409,573 09/550,333 06/25/02 6,409,576 09/626,124 06/25/02 6,409,583 09/522,677 06/25/02 6,409,585 09/468,307 06/25/02 6,409,593 09/624,634 06/25/02 6,409,599 09/617,388 06/25/02 6,409,606 09/627,157 06/25/02 6,409,609 09/659,514 06/25/02 6,409,613 09/782,038 06/25/02
August 17, 2010 | US PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE | 1357 OG 151 |
6,409,615 09/662,861 06/25/02 6,409,617 09/770,257 06/25/02 6,409,618 09/594,980 06/25/02 6,409,620 09/615,053 06/25/02 6,409,621 09/569,996 06/25/02 6,409,625 09/708,706 06/25/02 6,409,626 09/605,864 06/25/02 6,409,627 09/402,132 06/25/02 6,409,628 09/676,411 06/25/02 6,409,640 09/776,726 06/25/02 6,409,642 09/313,383 06/25/02 6,409,644 09/671,255 06/25/02 6,409,646 09/203,435 06/25/02 6,409,647 09/604,195 06/25/02 6,409,648 09/608,917 06/25/02 6,409,652 09/665,729 06/25/02 6,409,655 09/263,116 06/25/02 6,409,656 09/529,708 06/25/02 6,409,660 09/254,428 06/25/02 6,409,663 09/439,873 06/25/02 6,409,664 09/444,706 06/25/02 6,409,669 09/256,848 06/25/02 6,409,671 09/597,726 06/25/02 6,409,679 09/879,729 06/25/02 6,409,689 09/694,601 06/25/02 6,409,694 09/602,296 06/25/02 6,409,695 09/362,274 06/25/02 6,409,697 09/304,730 06/25/02 6,409,698 09/723,057 06/25/02 6,409,702 09/867,529 06/25/02 6,409,709 09/573,972 06/25/02 6,409,719 09/663,786 06/25/02 6,409,726 09/705,201 06/25/02 6,409,735 09/554,519 06/25/02 6,409,751 09/710,884 06/25/02 6,409,774 09/330,400 06/25/02 6,409,788 09/235,461 06/25/02 6,409,794 09/825,363 06/25/02 6,409,799 09/443,593 06/25/02 6,409,800 09/648,982 06/25/02 6,409,801 09/676,012 06/25/02 6,409,802 09/463,662 06/25/02 6,409,803 09/616,080 06/25/02 6,409,810 09/403,464 06/25/02 6,409,813 09/434,392 06/25/02 6,409,816 09/505,364 06/25/02 6,409,817 09/566,329 06/25/02 6,409,818 09/505,473 06/25/02 6,409,830 09/585,019 06/25/02 6,409,834 09/469,483 06/25/02 6,409,837 09/231,357 06/25/02 6,409,841 09/705,424 06/25/02 6,409,844 09/623,218 06/25/02 6,409,845 09/277,176 06/25/02 6,409,846 09/527,245 06/25/02 6,409,859 09/337,453 06/25/02 6,409,861 09/533,111 06/25/02 6,409,862 09/384,217 06/25/02 6,409,865 09/562,083 06/25/02 6,409,880 09/883,380 06/25/02 6,409,882 09/427,127 06/25/02 6,409,895 09/552,645 06/25/02 6,409,905 09/709,742 06/25/02 6,409,906 09/696,149 06/25/02 6,409,911 09/660,695 06/25/02 6,409,915 09/844,614 06/25/02
August 17, 2010 | US PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE | 1357 OG 152 |
6,409,916 09/631,520 06/25/02 6,409,923 09/646,466 06/25/02 6,409,925 09/601,741 06/25/02 6,409,927 09/612,691 06/25/02 6,409,935 09/510,056 06/25/02 6,409,938 09/534,576 06/25/02 6,409,940 09/687,684 06/25/02 6,409,944 09/355,843 06/25/02 6,409,947 09/576,776 06/25/02 6,409,949 09/534,394 06/25/02 6,409,950 09/668,528 06/25/02 6,409,951 09/538,303 06/25/02 6,409,957 09/435,858 06/25/02 6,409,961 09/523,461 06/25/02 6,409,962 09/678,292 06/25/02 6,409,964 09/431,263 06/25/02 6,409,970 09/739,434 06/25/02 6,409,976 09/244,121 06/25/02 6,409,978 09/615,212 06/25/02 6,409,980 09/594,490 06/25/02 6,409,981 09/329,412 06/25/02 6,409,983 09/614,160 06/25/02 6,409,991 09/464,549 06/25/02 6,410,001 09/620,858 06/25/02 6,410,008 08/355,502 06/25/02 6,410,011 08/633,769 06/25/02 6,410,013 09/559,244 06/25/02 6,410,014 09/333,636 06/25/02 6,410,021 09/064,935 06/25/02 6,410,029 09/351,191 06/25/02 6,410,030 09/654,289 06/25/02 6,410,032 09/702,330 06/25/02 6,410,036 09/564,218 06/25/02 6,410,045 09/507,437 06/25/02 6,410,056 08/446,148 06/25/02 6,410,064 09/508,532 06/25/02 6,410,066 09/560,637 06/25/02 6,410,068 09/872,697 06/25/02 6,410,077 09/502,475 06/25/02 6,410,079 09/473,106 06/25/02 6,410,080 09/669,725 06/25/02 6,410,081 09/554,404 06/25/02 6,410,083 09/514,221 06/25/02 6,410,088 09/420,428 06/25/02 6,410,091 09/299,802 06/25/02 6,410,097 09/756,790 06/25/02 6,410,098 09/610,183 06/25/02 6,410,099 08/930,957 06/25/02 6,410,103 09/256,887 06/25/02 6,410,112 09/591,295 06/25/02 6,410,114 09/468,563 06/25/02 6,410,115 09/514,077 06/25/02 6,410,121 09/513,171 06/25/02 6,410,127 09/700,180 06/25/02 6,410,133 09/478,377 06/25/02 6,410,136 09/442,178 06/25/02 6,410,138 08/940,886 06/25/02 6,410,145 09/604,528 06/25/02 6,410,147 09/645,094 06/25/02 6,410,152 09/892,530 06/25/02 6,410,154 08/952,514 06/25/02 6,410,155 09/860,788 06/25/02 6,410,160 09/555,734 06/25/02 6,410,166 08/915,080 06/25/02 6,410,168 09/352,751 06/25/02 6,410,173 09/201,599 06/25/02
August 17, 2010 | US PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE | 1357 OG 153 |
6,410,174 09/120,583 06/25/02 6,410,175 09/191,049 06/25/02 6,410,179 09/552,229 06/25/02 6,410,192 09/458,254 06/25/02 6,410,221 09/370,861 06/25/02 6,410,226 08/927,165 06/25/02 6,410,227 08/989,915 06/25/02 6,410,233 09/270,391 06/25/02 6,410,235 09/325,554 06/25/02 6,410,239 09/461,125 06/25/02 6,410,241 09/535,366 06/25/02 6,410,245 09/053,611 06/25/02 6,410,249 09/619,353 06/25/02 6,410,253 09/133,966 06/25/02 6,410,261 08/965,272 06/25/02 6,410,263 09/015,189 06/25/02 6,410,264 09/127,578 06/25/02 6,410,265 09/183,270 06/25/02 6,410,277 08/931,818 06/25/02 6,410,280 09/808,126 06/25/02 6,410,282 09/538,984 06/25/02 6,410,284 09/411,088 06/25/02 6,410,286 09/018,824 06/25/02 6,410,289 09/740,028 06/25/02 6,410,291 09/832,498 06/25/02 6,410,292 09/832,614 06/25/02 6,410,294 09/734,673 06/25/02 6,410,296 09/586,562 06/25/02 6,410,297 09/443,800 06/25/02 6,410,299 09/649,796 06/25/02 6,410,305 09/398,727 06/25/02 6,410,307 09/936,264 06/25/02 6,410,308 09/818,852 06/25/02 6,410,314 09/412,825 06/25/02 6,410,332 09/149,586 06/25/02 6,410,335 09/234,651 06/25/02 6,410,340 09/643,723 06/25/02 6,410,341 09/353,188 06/25/02 6,410,342 08/914,861 06/25/02 6,410,347 09/395,032 06/25/02 6,410,353 09/862,485 06/25/02 6,410,369 09/591,511 06/25/02 6,410,372 09/881,601 06/25/02 6,410,391 09/607,317 06/25/02 6,410,392 09/874,111 06/25/02 6,410,394 09/465,305 06/25/02 6,410,397 09/677,260 06/25/02 6,410,399 09/606,493 06/25/02 6,410,402 09/680,380 06/25/02 6,410,403 09/703,831 06/25/02 6,410,411 09/575,972 06/25/02 6,410,428 09/677,745 06/25/02 6,410,429 09/795,113 06/25/02 6,410,432 09/300,632 06/25/02 6,410,438 09/691,946 06/25/02 6,410,452 09/795,309 06/25/02 6,410,465 09/421,135 06/25/02 6,410,467 09/288,454 06/25/02 6,410,481 08/445,165 06/25/02 6,410,483 09/010,457 06/25/02 6,410,493 09/438,965 06/25/02 6,410,496 09/431,552 06/25/02 6,410,499 10/010,074 06/25/02 6,410,508 09/414,189 06/25/02 6,410,513 09/573,809 06/25/02 6,410,525 09/674,363 06/25/02
August 17, 2010 | US PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE | 1357 OG 154 |
6,410,526 09/583,522 06/25/02 6,410,528 09/674,959 06/25/02 6,410,529 09/485,623 06/25/02 6,410,530 09/653,427 06/25/02 6,410,532 09/902,000 06/25/02 6,410,533 09/502,101 06/25/02 6,410,536 09/601,606 06/25/02 6,410,537 09/541,431 06/25/02 6,410,542 09/687,350 06/25/02 6,410,545 09/892,047 06/25/02 6,410,551 09/446,703 06/25/02 6,410,556 09/659,547 06/25/02 6,410,558 09/722,829 06/25/02 6,410,559 09/822,071 06/25/02 6,410,562 09/581,498 06/25/02 6,410,563 09/741,517 06/25/02 6,410,564 08/428,922 06/25/02 6,410,566 09/905,077 06/25/02 6,410,574 09/362,087 06/25/02 6,410,576 09/744,710 06/25/02 6,410,578 09/699,274 06/25/02 6,410,579 09/783,656 06/25/02 6,410,581 09/367,981 06/25/02 6,410,585 09/265,410 06/25/02 6,410,586 09/810,266 06/25/02 6,410,601 09/832,864 06/25/02 6,410,603 09/871,744 06/25/02 6,410,604 09/871,749 06/25/02 6,410,613 09/485,882 06/25/02 6,410,616 09/287,509 06/25/02 6,410,617 09/743,211 06/25/02 6,410,621 09/171,611 06/25/02 6,410,622 09/658,964 06/25/02 6,410,624 09/395,446 06/25/02 6,410,625 09/535,484 06/25/02 6,410,633 09/497,451 06/25/02 6,410,634 09/219,863 06/25/02 6,410,644 09/861,355 06/25/02 6,410,648 09/581,817 06/25/02 6,410,656 09/230,578 06/25/02 6,410,683 09/513,636 06/25/02 6,410,686 08/665,034 06/25/02 6,410,690 08/484,172 06/25/02 6,410,691 09/375,416 06/25/02 6,410,692 09/017,284 06/25/02 6,410,695 08/913,217 06/25/02 6,410,701 08/462,509 06/25/02 6,410,705 09/431,099 06/25/02 6,410,706 09/503,922 06/25/02 6,410,709 09/257,179 06/25/02 6,410,710 09/268,544 06/25/02 6,410,715 09/593,483 06/25/02 6,410,721 09/225,645 06/25/02 6,410,725 09/513,179 06/25/02 6,410,726 09/757,291 06/25/02 6,410,727 09/857,414 06/25/02 6,410,729 09/598,740 06/25/02 6,410,735 09/578,088 06/25/02 6,410,736 09/692,335 06/25/02 6,410,744 09/445,409 06/25/02 6,410,748 09/847,387 06/25/02 6,410,759 09/629,454 06/25/02 6,410,760 09/678,702 06/25/02 6,410,764 09/764,722 06/25/02 6,410,768 09/804,370 06/25/02 6,410,775 09/160,513 06/25/02
August 17, 2010 | US PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE | 1357 OG 155 |
6,410,776 09/647,422 06/25/02 6,410,780 09/647,381 06/25/02 6,410,781 09/514,773 06/25/02 6,410,782 09/446,617 06/25/02 6,410,787 09/783,649 06/25/02 6,410,788 09/927,007 06/25/02 6,410,789 09/367,971 06/25/02 6,410,792 09/294,961 06/25/02 6,410,794 09/705,306 06/25/02 6,410,797 09/623,081 06/25/02 6,410,801 09/442,882 06/25/02 6,410,803 09/462,281 06/25/02 6,410,809 09/647,063 06/25/02 6,410,810 09/512,289 06/25/02 6,410,813 09/596,406 06/25/02 6,410,818 09/736,595 06/25/02 6,410,825 09/402,929 06/25/02 6,410,827 09/452,238 06/25/02 6,410,832 09/720,801 06/25/02 6,410,833 09/878,516 06/25/02 6,410,834 09/672,869 06/25/02 6,410,836 09/920,773 06/25/02 6,410,844 09/325,514 06/25/02 6,410,851 09/626,141 06/25/02 6,410,854 08/752,865 06/25/02 6,410,856 09/397,476 06/25/02 6,410,860 08/897,428 06/25/02 6,410,863 09/360,331 06/25/02 6,410,870 09/534,784 06/25/02 6,410,871 09/595,408 06/25/02 6,410,876 09/541,073 06/25/02 6,410,879 09/883,412 06/25/02 6,410,885 09/848,145 06/25/02 6,410,886 09/113,575 06/25/02 6,410,890 09/829,867 06/25/02 6,410,891 09/522,460 06/25/02 6,410,899 09/492,103 06/25/02 6,410,912 09/712,109 06/25/02 6,410,920 09/400,745 06/25/02 6,410,921 09/239,436 06/25/02 6,410,923 09/550,945 06/25/02 6,410,929 09/585,347 06/25/02 6,410,932 09/223,646 06/25/02 6,410,933 09/443,769 06/25/02 6,410,934 09/781,147 06/25/02 6,410,936 09/159,630 06/25/02 6,410,937 09/529,019 06/25/02 6,410,945 09/603,433 06/25/02 6,410,952 09/828,205 06/25/02 6,410,953 09/805,479 06/25/02 6,410,965 09/502,162 06/25/02 6,410,977 09/204,347 06/25/02 6,410,978 09/370,990 06/25/02 6,410,980 09/640,777 06/25/02 6,410,987 09/450,676 06/25/02 6,410,988 09/570,895 06/25/02 6,410,992 09/644,527 06/25/02 6,410,994 09/310,062 06/25/02 6,410,996 08/640,516 06/25/02 6,411,001 09/686,400 06/25/02 6,411,013 09/476,667 06/25/02 6,411,016 09/707,920 06/25/02 6,411,019 09/361,137 06/25/02 6,411,022 09/634,946 06/25/02 6,411,023 09/496,643 06/25/02 6,411,024 09/250,117 06/25/02
August 17, 2010 | US PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE | 1357 OG 156 |
6,411,025 09/499,294 06/25/02 6,411,026 09/756,166 06/25/02 6,411,028 09/110,962 06/25/02 6,411,033 09/420,799 06/25/02 6,411,036 09/466,614 06/25/02 6,411,037 09/612,907 06/25/02 6,411,043 09/841,175 06/25/02 6,411,044 09/793,757 06/25/02 6,411,047 09/748,858 06/25/02 6,411,057 09/924,081 06/25/02 6,411,075 09/525,855 06/25/02 6,411,080 09/821,992 06/25/02 6,411,083 09/436,231 06/25/02 6,411,087 09/567,731 06/25/02 6,411,089 09/718,747 06/25/02 6,411,100 09/645,656 06/25/02 6,411,102 09/479,151 06/25/02 6,411,104 09/553,319 06/25/02 6,411,144 09/633,263 06/25/02 6,411,157 09/606,650 06/25/02 6,411,167 09/771,911 06/25/02 6,411,168 09/789,362 06/25/02 6,411,175 09/452,693 06/25/02 6,411,178 09/644,259 06/25/02 6,411,192 09/221,733 06/25/02 6,411,194 09/794,596 06/25/02 6,411,197 09/333,052 06/25/02 6,411,202 09/423,095 06/25/02 6,411,210 09/718,184 06/25/02 6,411,229 09/842,652 06/25/02 6,411,243 09/717,208 06/25/02 6,411,250 09/486,323 06/25/02 6,411,252 09/344,416 06/25/02 6,411,255 09/798,896 06/25/02 6,411,263 09/675,449 06/25/02 6,411,270 09/143,111 06/25/02 6,411,278 09/347,194 06/25/02 6,411,279 09/333,674 06/25/02 6,411,280 09/362,232 06/25/02 6,411,287 09/392,577 06/25/02 6,411,293 09/319,864 06/25/02 6,411,294 09/265,888 06/25/02 6,411,299 09/475,376 06/25/02 6,411,302 09/226,350 06/25/02 6,411,309 09/273,048 06/25/02 6,411,319 09/919,848 06/25/02 6,411,323 09/732,477 06/25/02 6,411,342 09/016,837 06/25/02 6,411,345 09/410,932 06/25/02 6,411,346 09/218,150 06/25/02 6,411,350 09/789,811 06/25/02 6,411,362 09/225,072 06/25/02 6,411,368 09/488,021 06/25/02 6,411,370 09/447,786 06/25/02 6,411,374 09/863,292 06/25/02 6,411,376 09/602,646 06/25/02 6,411,381 09/562,256 06/25/02 6,411,382 09/548,581 06/25/02 6,411,386 09/506,742 06/25/02 6,411,387 09/667,702 06/25/02 6,411,389 09/564,073 06/25/02 6,411,398 09/327,676 06/25/02 6,411,408 09/364,914 06/25/02 6,411,409 09/708,647 06/25/02 6,411,412 09/731,760 06/25/02 6,411,418 09/289,342 06/25/02
August 17, 2010 | US PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE | 1357 OG 157 |
6,411,428 09/519,028 06/25/02 6,411,432 09/527,421 06/25/02 6,411,436 09/627,118 06/25/02 6,411,437 09/607,506 06/25/02 6,411,441 09/710,746 06/25/02 6,411,444 09/343,133 06/25/02 6,411,446 09/619,149 06/25/02 6,411,450 09/947,633 06/25/02 6,411,453 09/145,930 06/25/02 6,411,464 09/508,639 06/25/02 6,411,465 09/531,587 06/25/02 6,411,466 09/574,363 06/25/02 6,411,473 09/262,328 06/25/02 6,411,476 09/429,525 06/25/02 6,411,477 09/500,395 06/25/02 6,411,480 09/259,541 06/25/02 6,411,496 09/358,488 06/25/02 6,411,499 09/843,109 06/25/02 6,411,508 09/640,206 06/25/02 6,411,514 09/800,492 06/25/02 6,411,525 09/592,835 06/25/02 6,411,528 09/672,861 06/25/02 6,411,533 09/837,940 06/25/02 6,411,536 09/670,132 06/25/02 6,411,556 09/667,510 06/25/02 6,411,558 09/466,399 06/25/02 6,411,560 09/987,277 06/25/02 6,411,564 09/855,656 06/25/02 6,411,568 09/650,443 06/25/02 6,411,577 09/392,473 06/25/02 6,411,581 08/939,116 06/25/02 6,411,583 08/896,533 06/25/02 6,411,595 09/488,537 06/25/02 6,411,596 09/524,256 06/25/02 6,411,599 09/204,394 06/25/02 6,411,619 09/165,714 06/25/02 6,411,620 08/970,825 06/25/02 6,411,623 09/221,864 06/25/02 6,411,625 09/032,609 06/25/02 6,411,631 09/542,294 06/25/02 6,411,632 08/931,624 06/25/02 6,411,640 09/292,018 06/25/02 6,411,641 09/370,926 06/25/02 6,411,673 09/751,814 06/25/02 6,411,690 09/141,307 06/25/02 6,411,696 08/775,507 06/25/02 6,411,697 09/315,162 06/25/02 6,411,701 09/308,752 06/25/02 6,411,707 09/160,840 06/25/02 6,411,712 09/179,317 06/25/02 6,411,714 09/645,605 06/25/02 6,411,720 09/035,438 06/25/02 6,411,726 09/168,550 06/25/02 6,411,727 09/257,676 06/25/02 6,411,747 09/778,720 06/25/02 6,411,753 09/648,625 06/25/02 6,411,755 09/559,998 06/25/02 6,411,770 09/346,079 06/25/02 6,411,775 09/721,843 06/25/02 6,411,779 09/596,048 06/25/02 6,411,782 09/563,814 06/25/02 6,411,791 09/758,117 06/25/02 6,411,796 08/970,930 06/25/02 6,411,804 09/004,982 06/25/02 6,411,806 09/611,713 06/25/02 6,411,809 09/603,084 06/25/02
August 17, 2010 | US PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE | 1357 OG 158 |
6,411,821 09/645,351 06/25/02 6,411,823 09/263,863 06/25/02 6,411,827 09/226,917 06/25/02 6,411,834 09/654,268 06/25/02 6,411,837 09/270,353 06/25/02 6,411,854 09/353,237 06/25/02 6,411,878 09/816,228 06/25/02 6,411,882 09/728,890 06/25/02 6,411,887 09/564,228 06/25/02 6,411,893 09/898,819 06/25/02 6,411,902 09/551,478 06/25/02 6,411,906 09/245,312 06/25/02 6,411,913 10/025,520 06/25/02 6,411,914 09/450,317 06/25/02 6,411,928 08/897,734 06/25/02 6,411,929 09/625,855 06/25/02 6,411,930 09/249,414 06/25/02 6,411,934 08/804,693 06/25/02 6,411,939 09/313,164 06/25/02 6,411,944 09/040,096 06/25/02 6,411,964 09/220,084 06/25/02 6,411,978 09/318,632 06/25/02 6,411,980 09/774,713 06/25/02 6,411,995 09/188,628 06/25/02 6,412,025 09/282,136 06/25/02 6,412,041 09/494,380 06/25/02 6,412,058 09/300,012 06/25/02 6,412,092 09/292,035 06/25/02 6,412,096 09/303,154 06/25/02 6,412,099 09/531,832 06/25/02 6,412,103 09/355,143 06/25/02 6,412,108 09/306,194 06/25/02 PATENTS WHICH EXPIRED ON June 27, 2010 DUE TO FAILURE TO PAY MAINTENANCE FEES Patent Application Issue Number Number Date 7,065,791 11/074,969 06/27/06 7,065,795 10/664,832 06/27/06 7,065,798 10/989,326 06/27/06 7,065,801 11/079,489 06/27/06 7,065,802 10/627,652 06/27/06 7,065,807 11/175,479 06/27/06 7,065,809 10/431,185 06/27/06 7,065,810 10/910,519 06/27/06 7,065,813 10/859,387 06/27/06 7,065,814 10/657,153 06/27/06 7,065,822 11/129,810 06/27/06 7,065,827 10/309,035 06/27/06 7,065,829 10/902,565 06/27/06 7,065,831 10/498,631 06/27/06 7,065,833 10/890,288 06/27/06 7,065,835 10/917,190 06/27/06 7,065,836 10/473,904 06/27/06 7,065,839 09/982,455 06/27/06 7,065,851 10/888,636 06/27/06 7,065,859 10/725,407 06/27/06 7,065,875 10/721,651 06/27/06 7,065,878 10/786,750 06/27/06 7,065,885 10/999,302 06/27/06 7,065,886 10/678,791 06/27/06 7,065,890 11/045,668 06/27/06 7,065,892 10/102,515 06/27/06 7,065,896 11/034,766 06/27/06
August 17, 2010 | US PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE | 1357 OG 159 |
7,065,908 10/228,381 06/27/06 7,065,909 10/702,936 06/27/06 7,065,911 10/804,009 06/27/06 7,065,913 10/706,317 06/27/06 7,065,917 10/872,658 06/27/06 7,065,920 10/961,932 06/27/06 7,065,922 10/048,254 06/27/06 7,065,923 10/719,991 06/27/06 7,065,924 10/691,596 06/27/06 7,065,926 10/336,586 06/27/06 7,065,928 10/681,882 06/27/06 7,065,930 10/964,143 06/27/06 7,065,944 10/747,759 06/27/06 7,065,956 10/935,781 06/27/06 7,065,962 10/747,104 06/27/06 7,065,966 10/726,668 06/27/06 7,065,967 10/674,073 06/27/06 7,065,977 10/960,863 06/27/06 7,065,980 10/751,509 06/27/06 7,065,981 10/983,501 06/27/06 7,065,991 10/507,724 06/27/06 7,065,999 10/485,925 06/27/06 7,066,002 10/799,268 06/27/06 7,066,006 10/188,416 06/27/06 7,066,008 10/932,467 06/27/06 7,066,012 10/834,824 06/27/06 7,066,015 11/136,970 06/27/06 7,066,017 10/270,155 06/27/06 7,066,028 10/503,821 06/27/06 7,066,035 10/727,771 06/27/06 7,066,048 10/297,034 06/27/06 7,066,050 10/329,105 06/27/06 7,066,059 11/032,618 06/27/06 7,066,061 11/050,220 06/27/06 7,066,073 08/676,299 06/27/06 7,066,077 10/962,118 06/27/06 7,066,082 10/894,413 06/27/06 7,066,093 10/312,762 06/27/06 7,066,101 10/502,916 06/27/06 7,066,105 10/340,276 06/27/06 7,066,107 10/232,956 06/27/06 7,066,108 10/477,559 06/27/06 7,066,110 10/687,737 06/27/06 7,066,113 10/984,813 06/27/06 7,066,115 10/615,373 06/27/06 7,066,123 11/045,716 06/27/06 7,066,136 11/067,645 06/27/06 7,066,141 10/617,289 06/27/06 7,066,142 11/077,293 06/27/06 7,066,144 10/903,327 06/27/06 7,066,147 10/333,073 06/27/06 7,066,148 10/924,772 06/27/06 7,066,155 10/878,753 06/27/06 7,066,157 11/021,665 06/27/06 7,066,160 11/071,157 06/27/06 7,066,161 10/897,027 06/27/06 7,066,165 10/922,213 06/27/06 7,066,166 10/942,282 06/27/06 7,066,169 09/799,275 06/27/06 7,066,172 10/449,464 06/27/06 7,066,180 10/616,042 06/27/06 7,066,185 10/332,341 06/27/06 7,066,195 10/616,250 06/27/06 7,066,197 10/525,561 06/27/06 7,066,198 10/749,968 06/27/06 7,066,200 10/488,770 06/27/06
August 17, 2010 | US PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE | 1357 OG 160 |
7,066,212 11/217,117 06/27/06 7,066,213 10/421,001 06/27/06 7,066,220 11/292,642 06/27/06 7,066,222 10/784,684 06/27/06 7,066,223 10/878,872 06/27/06 7,066,224 10/257,852 06/27/06 7,066,225 10/757,066 06/27/06 7,066,226 11/209,960 06/27/06 7,066,227 11/070,637 06/27/06 7,066,229 10/619,628 06/27/06 7,066,270 09/898,795 06/27/06 7,066,273 10/474,297 06/27/06 7,066,276 10/685,040 06/27/06 7,066,292 10/492,060 06/27/06 7,066,293 10/661,277 06/27/06 7,066,294 10/835,602 06/27/06 7,066,295 11/139,695 06/27/06 7,066,299 10/819,487 06/27/06 7,066,304 10/901,792 06/27/06 7,066,309 10/998,874 06/27/06 7,066,313 10/821,619 06/27/06 7,066,314 10/642,052 06/27/06 7,066,316 10/522,950 06/27/06 7,066,322 09/951,811 06/27/06 7,066,323 10/686,453 06/27/06 7,066,328 10/840,398 06/27/06 7,066,329 10/675,186 06/27/06 7,066,333 10/431,883 06/27/06 7,066,337 10/164,773 06/27/06 7,066,339 10/826,648 06/27/06 7,066,341 10/462,115 06/27/06 7,066,346 10/465,925 06/27/06 7,066,355 10/877,053 06/27/06 7,066,361 10/669,246 06/27/06 7,066,362 10/442,214 06/27/06 7,066,365 10/426,267 06/27/06 7,066,368 09/926,175 06/27/06 7,066,378 10/180,835 06/27/06 7,066,381 10/886,243 06/27/06 7,066,382 10/275,179 06/27/06 7,066,386 11/039,942 06/27/06 7,066,392 11/154,543 06/27/06 7,066,397 10/809,128 06/27/06 7,066,400 11/068,956 06/27/06 7,066,405 10/800,186 06/27/06 7,066,406 10/192,177 06/27/06 7,066,418 10/391,591 06/27/06 7,066,423 10/739,352 06/27/06 7,066,426 10/315,686 06/27/06 7,066,432 10/669,838 06/27/06 7,066,438 10/712,922 06/27/06 7,066,439 10/399,642 06/27/06 7,066,469 10/213,233 06/27/06 7,066,472 10/419,804 06/27/06 7,066,473 10/850,084 06/27/06 7,066,475 10/714,360 06/27/06 7,066,479 10/421,116 06/27/06 7,066,480 10/482,817 06/27/06 7,066,485 10/916,542 06/27/06 7,066,489 10/465,322 06/27/06 7,066,491 10/416,230 06/27/06 7,066,503 10/884,162 06/27/06 7,066,513 10/364,990 06/27/06 7,066,514 10/362,210 06/27/06 7,066,517 10/773,556 06/27/06 7,066,519 11/174,923 06/27/06
August 17, 2010 | US PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE | 1357 OG 161 |
7,066,522 10/519,643 06/27/06 7,066,523 10/868,750 06/27/06 7,066,528 10/773,560 06/27/06 7,066,532 10/292,669 06/27/06 7,066,534 10/216,032 06/27/06 7,066,539 10/842,478 06/27/06 7,066,543 09/755,515 06/27/06 7,066,547 11/177,960 06/27/06 7,066,548 10/360,428 06/27/06 7,066,556 10/745,617 06/27/06 7,066,559 10/651,096 06/27/06 7,066,561 10/495,852 06/27/06 7,066,587 10/754,989 06/27/06 7,066,592 10/982,159 06/27/06 7,066,594 10/915,873 06/27/06 7,066,600 11/150,297 06/27/06 7,066,603 10/665,549 06/27/06 7,066,612 10/916,911 06/27/06 7,066,613 10/633,244 06/27/06 7,066,618 10/634,094 06/27/06 7,066,619 10/652,285 06/27/06 7,066,625 10/852,565 06/27/06 7,066,627 11/004,922 06/27/06 7,066,629 10/065,477 06/27/06 7,066,630 10/868,851 06/27/06 7,066,634 10/788,292 06/27/06 7,066,646 10/737,078 06/27/06 7,066,649 10/813,147 06/27/06 7,066,655 10/376,250 06/27/06 7,066,673 11/100,079 06/27/06 7,066,675 10/985,682 06/27/06 7,066,679 10/713,780 06/27/06 7,066,682 10/792,299 06/27/06 7,066,683 10/659,516 06/27/06 7,066,686 10/864,640 06/27/06 7,066,692 10/346,237 06/27/06 7,066,695 10/744,498 06/27/06 7,066,704 10/149,064 06/27/06 7,066,705 10/893,400 06/27/06 7,066,711 10/478,033 06/27/06 7,066,726 10/070,562 06/27/06 7,066,727 11/083,487 06/27/06 7,066,737 10/049,915 06/27/06 7,066,740 10/604,555 06/27/06 7,066,743 10/913,090 06/27/06 7,066,745 11/251,709 06/27/06 7,066,748 11/220,517 06/27/06 7,066,749 10/709,689 06/27/06 7,066,750 10/519,854 06/27/06 7,066,759 10/856,712 06/27/06 7,066,776 10/684,549 06/27/06 7,066,811 10/091,822 06/27/06 7,066,817 09/969,773 06/27/06 7,066,821 10/878,707 06/27/06 7,066,822 10/352,463 06/27/06 7,066,824 10/039,476 06/27/06 7,066,831 10/835,136 06/27/06 7,066,833 10/372,786 06/27/06 7,066,849 10/979,036 06/27/06 7,066,855 10/647,906 06/27/06 7,066,856 10/236,766 06/27/06 7,066,864 10/481,956 06/27/06 7,066,887 10/689,081 06/27/06 7,066,897 10/431,447 06/27/06 7,066,898 10/329,661 06/27/06 7,066,899 10/969,546 06/27/06
August 17, 2010 | US PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE | 1357 OG 162 |
7,066,901 10/126,045 06/27/06 7,066,905 10/293,002 06/27/06 7,066,913 10/102,474 06/27/06 7,066,919 11/125,361 06/27/06 7,066,930 10/118,283 06/27/06 7,066,938 10/237,508 06/27/06 7,066,946 10/797,558 06/27/06 7,066,950 10/284,813 06/27/06 7,066,953 10/175,357 06/27/06 7,066,957 10/168,679 06/27/06 7,066,958 10/434,930 06/27/06 7,066,961 10/292,539 06/27/06 7,066,969 10/484,135 06/27/06 7,066,974 09/509,836 06/27/06 7,066,982 10/825,993 06/27/06 7,066,984 10/671,404 06/27/06 7,066,993 10/468,253 06/27/06 7,066,999 10/944,278 06/27/06 7,067,001 10/512,352 06/27/06 7,067,019 10/719,046 06/27/06 7,067,029 10/220,349 06/27/06 7,067,032 10/088,575 06/27/06 7,067,044 10/694,251 06/27/06 7,067,047 10/148,708 06/27/06 7,067,055 11/045,030 06/27/06 7,067,073 10/368,341 06/27/06 7,067,074 10/257,293 06/27/06 7,067,077 10/833,632 06/27/06 7,067,078 10/292,446 06/27/06 7,067,083 11/105,898 06/27/06 7,067,084 10/110,916 06/27/06 7,067,092 10/694,827 06/27/06 7,067,097 10/364,863 06/27/06 7,067,113 10/299,642 06/27/06 7,067,114 10/768,293 06/27/06 7,067,131 10/330,530 06/27/06 7,067,136 10/914,165 06/27/06 7,067,142 10/054,145 06/27/06 7,067,156 10/705,281 06/27/06 7,067,175 10/682,823 06/27/06 7,067,189 10/887,156 06/27/06 7,067,192 11/067,785 06/27/06 7,067,193 10/685,261 06/27/06 7,067,196 10/311,291 06/27/06 7,067,210 11/054,498 06/27/06 7,067,227 10/155,523 06/27/06 7,067,235 10/050,322 06/27/06 7,067,239 10/461,825 06/27/06 7,067,243 10/384,321 06/27/06 7,067,248 10/504,687 06/27/06 7,067,252 09/882,144 06/27/06 7,067,256 10/246,078 06/27/06 7,067,259 10/667,891 06/27/06 7,067,261 10/318,842 06/27/06 7,067,262 10/258,936 06/27/06 7,067,273 10/741,205 06/27/06 7,067,276 10/836,453 06/27/06 7,067,277 09/471,572 06/27/06 7,067,278 09/890,463 06/27/06 7,067,280 10/373,802 06/27/06 7,067,282 11/239,107 06/27/06 7,067,291 10/327,492 06/27/06 7,067,292 10/488,143 06/27/06 7,067,295 09/958,231 06/27/06 7,067,305 10/412,114 06/27/06 7,067,307 10/641,275 06/27/06
August 17, 2010 | US PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE | 1357 OG 163 |
7,067,312 10/247,146 06/27/06 7,067,316 10/705,720 06/27/06 7,067,321 10/082,673 06/27/06 7,067,329 10/273,115 06/27/06 7,067,336 09/506,289 06/27/06 7,067,338 10/787,674 06/27/06 7,067,346 10/377,533 06/27/06 7,067,371 10/900,523 06/27/06 7,067,394 10/787,876 06/27/06 7,067,399 10/424,197 06/27/06 7,067,400 10/943,354 06/27/06 7,067,404 11/031,144 06/27/06 7,067,406 10/632,578 06/27/06 7,067,443 09/379,215 06/27/06 7,067,462 10/164,338 06/27/06 7,067,467 10/323,492 06/27/06 7,067,472 09/194,889 06/27/06 7,067,474 09/641,104 06/27/06 7,067,480 10/490,197 06/27/06 7,067,485 09/187,661 06/27/06 7,067,487 10/335,057 06/27/06 7,067,489 10/879,479 06/27/06 7,067,491 10/502,768 06/27/06 7,067,493 11/172,012 06/27/06 7,067,500 10/125,647 06/27/06 7,067,501 10/851,769 06/27/06 7,067,507 10/170,331 06/27/06 7,067,509 10/797,487 06/27/06 7,067,510 10/521,137 06/27/06 7,067,517 10/319,212 06/27/06 7,067,523 10/502,948 06/27/06 7,067,528 10/474,725 06/27/06 7,067,532 10/415,812 06/27/06 7,067,534 10/719,358 06/27/06 7,067,536 10/825,862 06/27/06 7,067,538 10/442,917 06/27/06 7,067,541 10/860,771 06/27/06 7,067,552 09/978,436 06/27/06 7,067,566 10/415,692 06/27/06 7,067,569 10/332,479 06/27/06 7,067,570 10/730,079 06/27/06 7,067,584 10/623,218 06/27/06 7,067,591 10/250,724 06/27/06 7,067,592 10/720,098 06/27/06 7,067,593 10/713,469 06/27/06 7,067,595 10/678,459 06/27/06 7,067,599 09/452,982 06/27/06 7,067,607 10/382,465 06/27/06 7,067,616 10/606,521 06/27/06 7,067,618 09/869,049 06/27/06 7,067,624 09/331,631 06/27/06 7,067,626 09/899,495 06/27/06 7,067,627 10/147,603 06/27/06 7,067,631 10/457,372 06/27/06 7,067,632 10/617,910 06/27/06 7,067,633 10/787,603 06/27/06 7,067,635 10/783,415 06/27/06 7,067,652 11/086,363 06/27/06 7,067,653 10/258,948 06/27/06 7,067,657 10/472,992 06/27/06 7,067,660 10/724,805 06/27/06 7,067,664 09/580,281 06/27/06 7,067,667 10/694,845 06/27/06 7,067,669 11/300,862 06/27/06 7,067,670 10/887,450 06/27/06 7,067,678 10/997,279 06/27/06
August 17, 2010 | US PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE | 1357 OG 164 |
7,067,679 10/658,241 06/27/06 7,067,680 10/451,938 06/27/06 7,067,682 10/703,155 06/27/06 7,067,684 11/013,834 06/27/06 7,067,685 10/491,918 06/27/06 7,067,689 11/177,410 06/27/06 7,067,696 10/863,511 06/27/06 7,067,700 10/479,155 06/27/06 7,067,705 10/938,652 06/27/06 7,067,706 10/257,590 06/27/06 7,067,708 10/453,336 06/27/06 7,067,722 10/176,149 06/27/06 7,067,725 10/807,867 06/27/06 7,067,744 10/826,013 06/27/06 7,067,752 10/975,440 06/27/06 7,067,754 10/683,087 06/27/06 7,067,759 10/421,233 06/27/06 7,067,760 10/880,429 06/27/06 7,067,761 10/742,882 06/27/06 7,067,772 10/308,342 06/27/06 7,067,783 10/261,359 06/27/06 7,067,785 10/439,066 06/27/06 7,067,788 10/459,602 06/27/06 7,067,794 10/672,083 06/27/06 7,067,800 10/457,171 06/27/06 7,067,810 10/393,259 06/27/06 7,067,822 10/718,754 06/27/06 7,067,825 10/692,368 06/27/06 7,067,829 10/995,836 06/27/06 7,067,833 10/290,207 06/27/06 7,067,834 10/375,377 06/27/06 7,067,835 10/745,316 06/27/06 7,067,837 10/814,670 06/27/06 7,067,840 10/283,883 06/27/06 7,067,858 11/194,600 06/27/06 7,067,860 10/775,126 06/27/06 7,067,871 10/868,014 06/27/06 7,067,878 09/964,809 06/27/06 7,067,888 09/985,303 06/27/06 7,067,903 10/701,499 06/27/06 7,067,913 10/917,312 06/27/06 7,067,914 09/683,027 06/27/06 7,067,923 10/726,392 06/27/06 7,067,953 11/302,141 06/27/06 7,067,956 10/653,213 06/27/06 7,067,963 09/983,250 06/27/06 7,067,964 10/847,683 06/27/06 7,067,970 10/647,794 06/27/06 7,067,971 10/900,124 06/27/06 7,067,972 10/624,682 06/27/06 7,067,974 11/282,419 06/27/06 7,067,975 10/859,206 06/27/06 7,067,979 10/491,408 06/27/06 7,067,982 11/195,432 06/27/06 7,068,001 11/186,847 06/27/06 7,068,004 11/107,668 06/27/06 7,068,014 10/617,202 06/27/06 7,068,023 10/812,091 06/27/06 7,068,030 10/833,779 06/27/06 7,068,039 10/834,449 06/27/06 7,068,049 10/635,395 06/27/06 7,068,054 10/373,663 06/27/06 7,068,060 11/099,201 06/27/06 7,068,061 11/282,911 06/27/06 7,068,067 11/073,745 06/27/06 7,068,068 10/390,324 06/27/06
August 17, 2010 | US PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE | 1357 OG 165 |
7,068,083 10/738,876 06/27/06 7,068,090 10/492,041 06/27/06 7,068,093 10/336,793 06/27/06 7,068,109 10/735,225 06/27/06 7,068,150 10/374,028 06/27/06 7,068,164 10/651,846 06/27/06 7,068,168 10/987,924 06/27/06 7,068,176 10/790,380 06/27/06 7,068,178 09/995,021 06/27/06 7,068,196 10/489,947 06/27/06 7,068,199 10/771,466 06/27/06 7,068,207 10/296,803 06/27/06 7,068,208 10/461,467 06/27/06 7,068,228 10/523,108 06/27/06 7,068,232 10/891,707 06/27/06 7,068,258 09/849,745 06/27/06 7,068,260 09/946,383 06/27/06 7,068,268 10/190,479 06/27/06 7,068,269 10/231,545 06/27/06 7,068,305 09/799,981 06/27/06 7,068,310 09/545,203 06/27/06 7,068,325 10/416,673 06/27/06 7,068,327 10/292,526 06/27/06 7,068,333 10/492,748 06/27/06 7,068,347 10/327,251 06/27/06 7,068,350 10/456,485 06/27/06 7,068,352 10/785,803 06/27/06 7,068,358 10/500,973 06/27/06 7,068,368 10/088,889 06/27/06 7,068,374 10/458,336 06/27/06 7,068,377 10/113,362 06/27/06 7,068,399 09/816,818 06/27/06 7,068,408 11/113,280 06/27/06 7,068,413 11/134,604 06/27/06 7,068,416 10/822,414 06/27/06 7,068,426 10/455,112 06/27/06 7,068,448 10/710,598 06/27/06 7,068,453 10/789,907 06/27/06 7,068,475 09/883,899 06/27/06 7,068,482 10/387,555 06/27/06 7,068,502 10/930,135 06/27/06 7,068,504 10/727,756 06/27/06 7,068,510 10/728,299 06/27/06 7,068,513 11/244,586 06/27/06 7,068,531 10/754,935 06/27/06 7,068,533 10/955,832 06/27/06 7,068,552 10/175,959 06/27/06 7,068,554 11/054,272 06/27/06 7,068,566 10/834,173 06/27/06 7,068,573 10/305,198 06/27/06 7,068,576 10/026,740 06/27/06 7,068,586 10/742,976 06/27/06 7,068,596 09/699,108 06/27/06 7,068,606 09/954,363 06/27/06 7,068,640 09/801,557 06/27/06 7,068,653 09/975,961 06/27/06 7,068,659 09/293,293 06/27/06 7,068,660 10/000,758 06/27/06 7,068,662 10/748,578 06/27/06 7,068,664 09/854,479 06/27/06 7,068,687 09/991,827 06/27/06 7,068,699 10/839,451 06/27/06 7,068,700 10/714,578 06/27/06 7,068,709 09/990,324 06/27/06 7,068,713 10/206,673 06/27/06 7,068,741 10/675,576 06/27/06
August 17, 2010 | US PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE | 1357 OG 166 |
7,068,764 10/220,179 06/27/06 7,068,785 10/067,563 06/27/06 7,068,798 10/707,403 06/27/06 7,068,799 09/781,273 06/27/06 7,068,819 10/192,907 06/27/06 7,068,820 10/281,783 06/27/06 7,068,831 09/942,004 06/27/06 7,068,837 10/181,783 06/27/06 7,068,851 09/467,544 06/27/06 7,068,854 09/474,715 06/27/06 7,068,875 11/105,207 06/27/06 7,068,881 10/645,165 06/27/06 7,068,903 10/438,827 06/27/06 7,068,910 10/527,952 06/27/06 7,068,913 09/355,690 06/27/06 7,068,916 09/840,205 06/27/06 7,068,928 10/920,782 06/27/06 7,068,943 10/778,979 06/27/06 7,068,944 10/120,925 06/27/06 7,068,948 09/971,831 06/27/06 7,069,034 09/717,334 06/27/06 7,069,045 10/092,249 06/27/06 7,069,051 09/831,049 06/27/06 7,069,059 10/921,096 06/27/06 7,069,094 10/102,708 06/27/06 7,069,095 10/727,974 06/27/06 7,069,113 10/616,249 06/27/06 7,069,119 10/679,284 06/27/06 7,069,125 10/201,538 06/27/06 7,069,131 10/890,741 06/27/06 7,069,141 10/475,736 06/27/06 7,069,154 10/524,449 06/27/06 7,069,156 10/763,582 06/27/06 7,069,162 10/761,405 06/27/06 7,069,170 10/794,740 06/27/06 7,069,185 09/650,626 06/27/06 7,069,206 10/422,687 06/27/06 7,069,210 09/725,415 06/27/06 7,069,225 11/087,129 06/27/06 7,069,262 09/857,364 06/27/06 7,069,273 10/321,419 06/27/06 7,069,287 09/956,755 06/27/06 7,069,296 10/121,646 06/27/06 7,069,297 10/396,396 06/27/06 7,069,304 09/092,791 06/27/06 7,069,331 09/951,202 06/27/06 7,069,345 09/852,467 06/27/06 7,069,350 10/625,685 06/27/06 7,069,357 10/765,783 06/27/06 7,069,360 10/232,125 06/27/06 7,069,370 10/355,214 06/27/06 7,069,390 10/655,401 06/27/06 7,069,394 10/313,293 06/27/06 7,069,395 09/972,349 06/27/06 7,069,410 10/015,223 06/27/06 7,069,425 09/573,258 06/27/06 7,069,445 09/998,681 06/27/06 7,069,449 09/921,620 06/27/06 7,069,470 10/256,152 06/27/06 7,069,477 10/283,994 06/27/06 7,069,481 10/193,051 06/27/06 7,069,482 09/642,858 06/27/06 7,069,487 10/361,247 06/27/06 7,069,509 10/052,579 06/27/06 7,069,529 10/484,231 06/27/06 7,069,532 10/720,922 06/27/06 7,069,536 09/894,076 06/27/06 7,069,542 09/943,304 06/27/06 7,069,545 09/751,930 06/27/06 7,069,547 10/003,950 06/27/06 7,069,548 10/183,663 06/27/06 7,069,557 10/153,995 06/27/06 7,069,566 10/755,378 06/27/06
Top of Notices August 17, 2010 | US PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE | Print This Notice 1357 OG 167 |
Patents Reinstated Due to the Acceptance of a Late Maintenance Fee from 07/19/2010 |
Patents Reinstated Due to the Acceptance of a Late Maintenance Fee from 07/19/2010 Patent Application Filing Issue Granted Number Number Date Date Date 5,471,237 08/156,036 11/22/93 11/28/95 07/20/10 5,604,483 08/385,480 02/08/95 02/18/97 07/19/10 5,611,921 08/636,675 04/23/96 03/18/97 07/19/10 5,623,259 08/410,222 03/24/95 04/22/97 07/19/10 5,649,851 08/511,222 08/04/95 07/22/97 07/19/10 5,660,733 08/419,289 04/10/95 08/26/97 07/19/10 5,673,975 08/590,821 01/24/96 10/07/97 07/19/10 5,683,583 08/636,653 04/23/96 11/04/97 07/19/10 5,707,438 08/604,736 02/21/96 01/13/98 07/20/10 5,718,092 08/309,753 09/21/94 02/17/98 07/19/10 5,778,370 08/519,347 08/25/95 07/07/98 07/21/10 5,778,835 08/839,375 04/18/97 07/14/98 07/23/10 5,985,481 08/857,698 05/16/97 11/16/99 07/19/10 6,026,532 08/777,032 12/30/96 02/22/00 07/19/10 6,063,405 09/049,653 01/08/98 05/16/00 07/19/10 6,071,142 09/130,849 08/07/98 06/06/00 07/19/10 6,077,234 09/103,232 06/23/98 06/20/00 07/19/10 6,094,306 08/047,238 04/13/93 07/25/00 07/20/10 6,095,031 09/227,403 01/08/99 08/01/00 07/19/10 6,112,855 09/089,024 06/02/98 09/05/00 07/22/10 6,126,507 09/124,709 07/29/98 10/03/00 07/22/10 6,131,645 09/201,989 12/01/98 10/17/00 07/22/10 6,131,892 09/348,221 07/06/99 10/17/00 07/19/10 6,170,844 09/293,555 04/15/99 01/09/01 07/19/10 6,240,928 09/524,143 03/10/00 06/05/01 07/19/10 6,241,786 09/399,248 09/20/99 06/05/01 07/19/10 6,250,312 09/360,323 07/23/99 06/26/01 07/19/10 6,260,241 09/395,874 09/14/99 07/17/01 07/19/10 6,260,331 09/501,745 02/10/00 07/17/01 07/19/10 6,273,853 09/482,052 01/13/00 08/14/01 07/19/10 6,285,297 09/304,277 05/03/99 09/04/01 07/19/10 6,286,086 09/220,127 12/23/98 09/04/01 07/20/10 6,298,144 09/081,608 05/20/98 10/02/01 07/23/10 6,305,880 09/350,948 07/09/99 10/23/01 07/23/10 6,343,964 09/712,686 11/14/00 02/05/02 07/20/10 6,347,761 09/627,715 07/28/00 02/19/02 07/19/10 6,349,059 09/716,746 11/20/00 02/19/02 07/20/10 6,352,475 09/440,146 11/15/99 03/05/02 07/19/10 6,367,619 09/615,236 07/13/00 04/09/02 07/21/10 6,387,119 09/796,590 03/02/01 05/14/02 07/19/10 6,398,713 09/590,969 06/09/00 06/04/02 07/19/10 6,404,327 09/772,364 01/30/01 06/11/02 07/19/10 6,415,033 09/536,093 03/24/00 07/02/02 07/21/10 6,471,587 09/047,147 03/24/98 10/29/02 07/20/10 6,719,131 10/048,907 02/04/02 04/13/04 07/23/10 6,816,711 09/995,551 11/27/01 11/09/04 07/19/10 6,852,235 10/731,398 12/10/03 02/08/05 07/19/10 6,890,137 10/607,113 06/25/03 05/10/05 07/20/10 6,902,086 10/159,631 05/30/02 06/07/05 07/19/10 6,938,631 10/461,002 06/13/03 09/06/05 07/20/10 6,988,676 10/203,867 08/14/02 01/24/06 07/22/10 6,995,004 09/874,390 06/04/01 02/07/06 07/23/10
Top of Notices August 17, 2010 | US PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE | Print This Notice 1357 OG 168 |
Reissue Applications Filed |
Reissue Applications Filed Notice under 37 CFR 1.11(b). The reissue applications listed below are open to public inspection by the general public through the Image File Wrapper (IFW) system (http://portal.uspto.gov/external/portal/pair) on the USPTO internet web site (www.uspto.gov), and copies may be obtained by paying the fee therefor (37 CFR 1.19). D. 588,842, Re. S.N. 29/365,400, Jul. 08, 2010, Cl. D06/480, TABLE, Hiroshi Saotome, Owner of Record: Okamura Corporation, Attorney or Agent: Robert C. Faber, Ex. Gp.: 2913 5,833,035, Re. S.N. 12/840,888, Jul. 21, 2010, Cl./Sub 188/072, DISC BRAKE CALIPER, Lars Severinsson, Owner of Record: Haldex Brake Products Akiebolag, Landskrona, Sweden, Attorney or Agent: Wesley W. Whitmyer, Jr., Ex. Gp: 3657 6,684,403, Re. S.N. 12/793,956, Jun. 04, 2010, Cl. 725/147, SYSTEM & METHOD FOR USER-SERVER TELECOMMUNICATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH PERFORMANCE CAPABILITIES OF A CONTROLLER, Claude Georges Barraud, Owner of Record: Sony Europe, Attorney or Agent: William S. Frommer, Ex. Gp.: 2423 6,920,723, Re. S.N. 12/842,100, Jul. 23, 2010, Cl./Sub 052/747, IMPACT SOUND INSULATION, Paul Charles Downey, Owner of Record: Ecore International Inc., Lancaster, PA, Attorney or Agent: Ricard L. Treanor, Ex. Gp: 3633 7,007,413, Re. S.N. 12/823,008, Jun. 24, 2010, Cl. 036/134, INVERSE SHOE CLEAT ASSEMBLY AND METHOD OF INSTALLATION, Faris W. McMullin, Owner of Record: Softspikes, LLC, Gaithersburg, MD, Attorney or Agent: Michael E. Grendzynski, Ex. Gp.: 3728 7,032,349, Re. S.N. 12/657,261, Jan. 15, 2010, Cl. 049/360, MOTOR DOOR CLOSURE SYSTEM FOR MOTOR VEHICLES, G. Clark Oberheide, et al., Owner of Record: Atoma International Corp., Newmarket, CA, Attorney or Agent: David J. Ford, Ex. Gp.: 3634 7,315,861, Re. S.N. 12/651,451, Jan. 01, 2010, Cl./Sub 707/010, TEXT MINING SYSTEM FOR WEB-BASED BUSINESS INTELLIGENCE, John C. Seibel, et al., Owner of Record: Dafineais Protocol Data B.V., LLC, Dover, DE, Attorney or Agent: Alex A. Courtade, Ex. Gp: 2164 7,320,066, Re. S.N. 12/656,111, Jan. 15, 2010, Cl. 712/239, BRANCH PREDICTING APPARATUS AND BRANCH PREDICTING METHOD, Megumi Yokoi, Owner of Record: Fujitsu Limited, Kawasaki-shi, JP, Attorney or Agent: Paul W. Bobowiec, Ex. Gp.: 2183 7,398,778, Re. S.N. 12/836,723, Jul. 15, 2010, Cl./Sub 062/125, SOLAR AND HEAT PUMP POWERED ELECTRIC FORCED HOT AIR HYDRONIC FURNACE, Stewart R. Kaiser, Owner of Record: Air Hydronic Product Solutions, Inc., Ft. Lauderdale, FL, Attorney or Agent: J. David Dainow, Ex. Gp: 3744 7,684,408, Re. S.N. 12/839,030, Jul. 19, 2010, Cl./Sub 510/446, COMMUNICATION MODE CONTROL METHOD, MOBILE COMMUNICATION SYSTEM, BASE STATION CONTROL APPARATUS, BASE STATION, AND MOBILE COMMUNICATION, Hideji Wakabayashi, Owner of Record: Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha, Tokyo, Japan, Attorney or Agent: Eckhard H. Kuesters, Ex. Gp: 1796
Top of Notices August 17, 2010 | US PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE | Print This Notice 1357 OG 169 |
Requests for Ex Parte Reexamination Filed |
Requests for Ex Parte Reexamination Filed 5,109,414, Reexam. C.N. 90/011,016, Requested Date: May 28, 2010, Cl. 380/009, Title: SIGNAL PROCESSING APPARATUS AND METHODS, Inventor: John C. Harvey et al., Owners of Record: The Personalized Mass Media Corporation, New York, NY, Attorney or Agent: Goodwin Procter, LLP., Washington, DC, Ex. Gp.: 3992, Requester: Bruce H. Stoner, Jr., Greenblum & Bernstein, PLC., Reston, VA 5,584,100, Reexam. C.N. 90/011,013, Requested Date: May 26, 2010, Cl. 016/301, Title: HINGE, Inventor: David Doyle et al., Owners of Record: D&D Group LTD., PTY, Australia, Attorney or Agent: Davis & Bujold, PLLC., Concord, NH, Ex. Gp.: 3993, Requester: David B. Woycechowsky, Bond Schoeneck & King, PLLC., Syracuse, NY 5,832,494, Reexam. C.N. 90/011,014, Requested Date: May 26, 2010, Cl. 707/102, Title: METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR INDEXING, SEARCHING AND DISPLAYING DATA, Inventor: Daniel Egger et al., Owners of Record: Software Rights Archive, LLC., Durham, NC, Attorney or Agent: Dorsey & Whitney, Washington, DC, Ex. Gp.: 3992, Requester: Google, Mountain View, CA, John C. Phillips, Fish & Richardson, San Diego, CA 6,060,818, Reexam. C.N. 90/010,854, Requested Date: Jun. 02, 2010, Cl. 310/363, Title: SBAR STRUCTURES AND METHOD OF FABRICATION OF SBAR.FBAR FILM PROCESSING TECHNIQUES FOR THE MANUFACTURING OF SBAR/BAR FILTERS, Inventor: Richard C. Ruby et al., Owners of Record: Avago Technologies Wireless IP (Singapore) PTE., LTD., Singapore, Attorney or Agent: Avago Technologies Limited, Fort Collin, CO, Ex. Gp.: 3992, Requester: John H. Thomas, Thomas Raring & Teague, PC., Richmond, VA 6,206,349, Reexam. C.N. 90/009,751, Requested Date: May 21, 2010, Cl. 261/112, Title: FLUID-FLUID CONTACTING APPARATUS, Inventor: William David Parten, Owners of Record: Sulzer Chemtech AG, Winterthur, Switzerland, Attorney or Agent: Townsend & Townsend & Crew, San Francisco, CA, Ex. Gp.: 3991, Requester: Jeffrey A. Tinker, Winstead, PC., Dallas, TX 6,233,571, Reexam. C.N. 90/011,012, Requested Date: May 25, 2010, Cl. 707/002, Title: METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR INDEXING, SEARCHING AND DISPLAYING DATA, Inventor: Daniel Egger et al., Owners of Record: Software Rights Archive, LLC., Durham, NC, Attorney or Agent: Andrews Kurth, LLP., Washington, DC, Ex. Gp.: 3992, Requester: Google, Inc., Mountain View, CA, Aldo Noto, Dorsey & Whitney, Washington, DC 6,675,589, Reexam. C.N. 90/009,752, Requested Date: May 21, 2010, Cl. 062/063, Title: FREEZE-CRUSTING PROCESS, Inventor: David Howard, Owners of Record: Unitherm Food Systems, Inc., Bristow, OK, Attorney or Agent: Fellers Snider Blankenship Bailey & Tippens, Tulsa, OK, Ex. Gp.: 3993, Requester: Henry C. Query, Jr., Henry Query, PC, Wheaton, IL 7,223,552, Reexam. C.N. 90/009,744, Requested Date: May 11, 2010, Cl. 600/435, Title: MYELOPEROXIDASE, A RISK INDICATOR FOR CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE, Inventor: Stanley Hazen et al., Owners of Record:The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, Attorney or Agent: Calfee Halter & Griswold, LLP., Cleveland, OH, Ex. Gp.: 3991, Requester: Peng Chen, Morrison & Foerster, LLP., San Diego, CA 7,504,451, Reexam. C.N. 90/009,753, Requested Date: May 25, 2010, Cl. 524/445, Title: FIRE RETARDANT COMPOSITIONS, Inventor: Stephen Clifford Brown et al., Owners of Record: Rockwood Clay Additives, GMBH, Germany, Attorney or Agent: Meyertons Hood Kivlin Kowert & Goetzel, PC., Austin, TX, Ex. Gp.: 3991, Requester: Frederick F. Calvetti, Hahn & Voight, PLLC., Washington, DC 7,575,512, Reexam. C.N. 90/009,737, Requested Date: May 28, 2010, Cl. 463/012, Title: MULTIPLAYER INTERACTIVE VIDEO GAMING DEVICE, Inventor: Julian J. Kennedy, Owners of Record: Vegas Amusement, Incorporated, Longs, SC, Attorney or Agent: Jones Tullar & Cooper, PC., Arlington, VA, Ex. Gp.: 3993, Requester: Allan Fanucci,Winston & Strawn, LLP., New York, NY
Top of Notices August 17, 2010 | US PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE | Print This Notice 1357 OG 170 |
Requests for Inter Partes Reexamination Filed |
Requests for Inter Partes Reexamination Filed 6,527,241, Reexam. C.N.: 95/001,357, Requested Date: Jun. 14, 2010, Cl.: 248/346, Title: APPARATUS FOR COOLING A LAPTOP COMPUTER, Inventor: Charles Lord, Owners of Record: IGO, Inc., Scottsdale, AZ, Attorney or Agent: IGO, Inc., Scottsdale, AZ, Ex. Gp.: 3993, Requester: Third Party Requester: Logitech, Inc.; (Att'y Is: Rodney C. LeRoy., Townsend and Townsend and, Crew, LLP., San Francisco, CA), Real Party in Interest: Same As Third Party Requester 6,619,168, Reexam. C.N.: 95/001,355, Requested Date: May 26, 2010, Cl.: 083/013, Title: METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR AUTOMATIC PRECISION CUTTING OF GRAPHICS AREAS FROM SHEETS, Inventor: Peter Alsten et al., Owners of Record: Mikkelsen Graphic Engineering, Lake Geneva, WI, Attorney or Agent: Jansson Shupe & Munger, LTD., Racine, WI, Ex. Gp.: 3993, Requester: Third Party Requester: (Att'y Is: James F. Boyle, Boyle Fredrickson, SC, Milwaukee, WI), Real Party in Interest: Zund Systemtechnik AG and Zund America, Inc. 6,808,692, Reexam. C.N.: 95/001,368, Requested Date: May 28, 2010, Cl.: 356/632, Title: ENHANCED MERCURY CONTROL IN COAL-FIRED POWER PLANTS, Inventor: Klaus H. Oehr, Owners of Record: Hazelmere Research, LTD., Canada, Attorney or Agent: Vermette & Co., Canada, Ex. Gp.: 3991, Requester: Third Party Requester: ALSTOM Power, Inc.; (Att'y Is: Peter C. Knops, Shook Hardy & Bacon, LLP., Kansas City, MO), Real Party in Interest: Same As Third Party Requester 6,809,227, Reexam. C.N.: 95/001,367, Requested Date: May 28, 2010, Cl.: 426/035, Title: METHOD FOR INCREASING LIGHT OLEFIN YIELD BY CONVERSION OF A HEAVY HYDROCARBON FRACTION OF A PRODUCT TO LIGHT OLEFINS, Inventor: Stephen Neil Vaughn, Owners of Record: Exxonmobil Chemical Patents, Inc., Houston, TX, Attorney or Agent: Exxonmobil Chemical Company, Baytown, TX, Ex. Gp.: 3991, Requester: Third Party Requester: UOP, LLC.; (Att'y Is: Benjamin C. Spehlmann, Banner & Whitcoff, LTD., Washington, DC), Real Party in Interest: Same As Third Party Requester
Top of Notices August 17, 2010 | US PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE | Print This Notice 1357 OG 171 |
Notice of Expiration of Trademark Registrations Due to Failure to Renew |
Notice of Expiration of Trademark Registrations Due to Failure to Renew 15 U.S.C. 1059 provides that each trademark registration may be renewed for periods of ten years from the end of the expiring period upon payment of the prescribed fee and the filing of an acceptable application for renewal. This may be done at any time within one year before the expiration of the period for which the registration was issued or renewed, or it may be done within six months after such expiration on payment of an additional fee. According to the records of the Office, the trademark registrations listed below are expired due to failure to renew in accordance with 15 U.S.C. 1059. TRADEMARK REGISTRATIONS WHICH EXPIRED July 24, 2010 DUE TO FAILURE TO RENEW Reg. Number Serial Number Reg. Date 690,246 72/065,236 12/22/1959 690,186 72/068,162 12/22/1959 690,226 72/077,771 12/22/1959 882,680 72/303,643 12/16/1969 882,460 72/317,560 12/16/1969 882,655 72/322,125 12/16/1969 882,382 72/324,729 12/16/1969 882,354 72/325,309 12/16/1969 1,127,805 73/141,821 12/18/1979 1,127,928 73/155,783 12/18/1979 1,127,933 73/164,934 12/18/1979 1,128,044 73/170,165 12/18/1979 1,127,973 73/173,871 12/18/1979 1,127,893 73/176,396 12/18/1979 1,127,916 73/183,273 12/18/1979 1,571,606 73/709,478 12/19/1989 1,571,464 73/722,014 12/19/1989 1,572,658 73/722,949 12/19/1989 1,571,609 73/725,128 12/19/1989 1,572,400 73/738,729 12/19/1989 1,571,815 73/741,439 12/19/1989 1,571,780 73/748,664 12/19/1989 1,571,628 73/750,687 12/19/1989 1,572,010 73/755,432 12/19/1989 1,571,826 73/758,191 12/19/1989 1,572,017 73/763,943 12/19/1989 1,572,112 73/764,957 12/19/1989 1,572,323 73/765,646 12/19/1989 1,572,666 73/766,448 12/19/1989 1,572,324 73/771,675 12/19/1989 1,572,325 73/774,098 12/19/1989 1,571,926 73/776,289 12/19/1989 1,571,474 73/783,102 12/19/1989 1,571,941 73/784,301 12/19/1989 1,571,567 73/785,028 12/19/1989 1,572,372 73/785,415 12/19/1989 1,572,251 73/786,209 12/19/1989 1,572,456 73/786,561 12/19/1989 1,571,849 73/787,331 12/19/1989 1,572,230 73/789,526 12/19/1989 1,571,943 73/790,531 12/19/1989 1,571,680 73/790,790 12/19/1989 1,571,684 73/791,398 12/19/1989 1,572,613 73/792,401 12/19/1989 1,572,428 73/792,974 12/19/1989
August 17, 2010 | US PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE | 1357 OG 172 |
1,572,506 73/792,991 12/19/1989 1,571,935 73/793,027 12/19/1989 1,571,497 73/794,992 12/19/1989 1,572,262 73/795,357 12/19/1989 1,571,985 73/795,449 12/19/1989 1,571,711 73/796,315 12/19/1989 1,571,712 73/796,767 12/19/1989 1,571,891 73/797,372 12/19/1989 1,572,142 73/798,017 12/19/1989 1,571,536 73/798,111 12/19/1989 1,572,242 73/798,201 12/19/1989 1,572,196 73/798,541 12/19/1989 1,571,741 73/798,644 12/19/1989 2,301,167 74/656,759 12/21/1999 2,302,504 75/303,871 12/21/1999 2,302,551 75/335,272 12/21/1999 2,302,552 75/335,273 12/21/1999 2,302,596 75/356,874 12/21/1999 2,302,618 75/377,359 12/21/1999 2,301,372 75/389,401 12/21/1999 2,301,467 75/425,207 12/21/1999 2,301,469 75/425,216 12/21/1999 2,302,759 75/430,197 12/21/1999 2,301,541 75/450,419 12/21/1999 2,301,581 75/464,905 12/21/1999 2,301,587 75/467,529 12/21/1999 2,301,676 75/494,201 12/21/1999 2,303,038 75/546,007 12/21/1999 2,301,921 75/554,618 12/21/1999 2,301,974 75/564,278 12/21/1999 2,302,028 75/572,751 12/21/1999 2,302,155 75/593,805 12/21/1999 2,302,256 75/633,561 12/21/1999 690,059 72/071,767 12/22/1959 1,127,898 73/166,830 12/18/1979 1,128,078 73/168,869 12/18/1979 1,572,248 73/776,507 12/19/1989 1,571,706 73/794,451 12/19/1989 1,572,433 73/795,163 12/19/1989 1,572,394 73/798,727 12/19/1989 2,302,313 74/520,269 12/21/1999 2,301,160 74/561,011 12/21/1999 2,302,319 74/570,655 12/21/1999 2,302,327 74/639,449 12/21/1999 2,302,328 74/639,450 12/21/1999 2,302,332 74/660,572 12/21/1999 2,302,333 74/661,903 12/21/1999 2,302,334 74/673,034 12/21/1999 2,301,168 74/678,557 12/21/1999 2,302,337 74/692,742 12/21/1999 2,302,341 74/718,392 12/21/1999 2,302,344 74/721,895 12/21/1999 2,302,345 74/721,896 12/21/1999 2,301,181 75/096,556 12/21/1999 2,302,373 75/097,295 12/21/1999 2,302,389 75/137,227 12/21/1999 2,302,390 75/139,812 12/21/1999 2,301,188 75/140,209 12/21/1999 2,301,192 75/164,608 12/21/1999 2,302,405 75/175,387 12/21/1999 2,301,202 75/202,770 12/21/1999 2,301,211 75/218,370 12/21/1999 2,302,431 75/225,192 12/21/1999 2,302,433 75/225,855 12/21/1999 2,302,975 75/236,981 12/21/1999 2,302,441 75/241,008 12/21/1999
August 17, 2010 | US PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE | 1357 OG 173 |
2,301,218 75/241,468 12/21/1999 2,301,226 75/254,771 12/21/1999 2,301,233 75/260,255 12/21/1999 2,302,462 75/265,392 12/21/1999 2,302,463 75/265,560 12/21/1999 2,302,465 75/269,030 12/21/1999 2,301,247 75/269,583 12/21/1999 2,302,474 75/274,897 12/21/1999 2,302,476 75/277,867 12/21/1999 2,302,477 75/278,433 12/21/1999 2,301,255 75/288,270 12/21/1999 2,302,498 75/295,992 12/21/1999 2,301,261 75/298,122 12/21/1999 2,301,262 75/300,106 12/21/1999 2,302,980 75/301,670 12/21/1999 2,302,505 75/304,949 12/21/1999 2,302,511 75/306,806 12/21/1999 2,302,513 75/307,164 12/21/1999 2,302,516 75/308,422 12/21/1999 2,301,270 75/309,547 12/21/1999 2,301,273 75/311,008 12/21/1999 2,302,532 75/322,292 12/21/1999 2,302,534 75/322,936 12/21/1999 2,302,544 75/330,233 12/21/1999 2,302,549 75/332,861 12/21/1999 2,301,300 75/340,196 12/21/1999 2,301,301 75/340,626 12/21/1999 2,302,566 75/341,792 12/21/1999 2,302,568 75/342,365 12/21/1999 2,301,304 75/343,540 12/21/1999 2,302,573 75/345,607 12/21/1999 2,302,985 75/348,025 12/21/1999 2,302,579 75/348,048 12/21/1999 2,302,582 75/349,993 12/21/1999 2,302,584 75/350,441 12/21/1999 2,302,987 75/352,314 12/21/1999 2,302,591 75/354,169 12/21/1999 2,301,316 75/354,321 12/21/1999 2,302,989 75/360,506 12/21/1999 2,302,607 75/369,236 12/21/1999 2,302,612 75/372,905 12/21/1999 2,301,344 75/375,649 12/21/1999 2,302,615 75/376,305 12/21/1999 2,302,622 75/380,421 12/21/1999 2,302,624 75/380,869 12/21/1999 2,301,356 75/382,381 12/21/1999 2,302,631 75/383,350 12/21/1999 2,302,994 75/384,722 12/21/1999 2,302,636 75/386,403 12/21/1999 2,302,637 75/386,978 12/21/1999 2,302,640 75/389,151 12/21/1999 2,301,379 75/391,720 12/21/1999 2,302,647 75/393,262 12/21/1999 2,302,653 75/396,321 12/21/1999 2,302,657 75/397,165 12/21/1999 2,302,662 75/397,647 12/21/1999 2,302,665 75/399,371 12/21/1999 2,302,676 75/402,647 12/21/1999 2,301,405 75/405,031 12/21/1999 2,302,690 75/405,333 12/21/1999 2,301,416 75/407,556 12/21/1999 2,301,417 75/407,841 12/21/1999 2,302,996 75/408,328 12/21/1999 2,302,699 75/408,663 12/21/1999 2,302,704 75/410,396 12/21/1999 2,301,423 75/410,777 12/21/1999
August 17, 2010 | US PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE | 1357 OG 174 |
2,302,711 75/411,799 12/21/1999 2,301,424 75/412,021 12/21/1999 2,302,998 75/413,191 12/21/1999 2,301,427 75/413,542 12/21/1999 2,302,723 75/415,208 12/21/1999 2,302,999 75/417,970 12/21/1999 2,302,738 75/421,865 12/21/1999 2,301,457 75/422,902 12/21/1999 2,302,745 75/424,178 12/21/1999 2,301,472 75/426,917 12/21/1999 2,302,752 75/426,971 12/21/1999 2,301,473 75/427,222 12/21/1999 2,302,756 75/428,992 12/21/1999 2,302,757 75/429,128 12/21/1999 2,301,482 75/430,064 12/21/1999 2,302,765 75/433,287 12/21/1999 2,301,493 75/435,902 12/21/1999 2,302,774 75/437,088 12/21/1999 2,302,776 75/437,747 12/21/1999 2,302,782 75/440,543 12/21/1999 2,302,793 75/443,886 12/21/1999 2,301,526 75/447,225 12/21/1999 2,301,531 75/448,055 12/21/1999 2,301,537 75/449,370 12/21/1999 2,302,813 75/453,469 12/21/1999 2,301,551 75/454,048 12/21/1999 2,302,819 75/456,576 12/21/1999 2,302,820 75/457,328 12/21/1999 2,301,577 75/462,610 12/21/1999 2,303,009 75/463,001 12/21/1999 2,301,580 75/464,695 12/21/1999 2,301,583 75/465,615 12/21/1999 2,301,584 75/466,592 12/21/1999 2,302,832 75/467,527 12/21/1999 2,302,833 75/467,546 12/21/1999 2,302,834 75/468,150 12/21/1999 2,302,835 75/468,180 12/21/1999 2,301,593 75/469,393 12/21/1999 2,301,596 75/470,053 12/21/1999 2,303,011 75/471,281 12/21/1999 2,302,839 75/471,605 12/21/1999 2,302,840 75/472,425 12/21/1999 2,302,844 75/474,205 12/21/1999 2,301,608 75/474,473 12/21/1999 2,301,616 75/476,686 12/21/1999 2,301,622 75/477,971 12/21/1999 2,301,628 75/479,358 12/21/1999 2,302,860 75/481,378 12/21/1999 2,301,632 75/482,511 12/21/1999 2,301,643 75/485,100 12/21/1999 2,302,878 75/487,925 12/21/1999 2,301,650 75/488,037 12/21/1999 2,301,654 75/489,237 12/21/1999 2,301,661 75/490,783 12/21/1999 2,302,886 75/493,099 12/21/1999 2,302,888 75/494,136 12/21/1999 2,302,890 75/495,094 12/21/1999 2,302,897 75/497,061 12/21/1999 2,301,683 75/497,498 12/21/1999 2,301,693 75/499,135 12/21/1999 2,302,904 75/499,660 12/21/1999 2,301,698 75/500,691 12/21/1999 2,301,700 75/500,983 12/21/1999 2,301,702 75/501,427 12/21/1999 2,301,707 75/502,235 12/21/1999 2,301,717 75/506,580 12/21/1999
August 17, 2010 | US PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE | 1357 OG 175 |
2,301,721 75/507,856 12/21/1999 2,301,722 75/507,939 12/21/1999 2,301,725 75/508,833 12/21/1999 2,301,733 75/510,258 12/21/1999 2,302,931 75/516,591 12/21/1999 2,301,752 75/516,856 12/21/1999 2,301,755 75/518,190 12/21/1999 2,301,766 75/522,578 12/21/1999 2,301,770 75/522,873 12/21/1999 2,301,771 75/523,075 12/21/1999 2,301,778 75/525,985 12/21/1999 2,302,938 75/526,274 12/21/1999 2,301,780 75/526,441 12/21/1999 2,301,783 75/526,771 12/21/1999 2,302,940 75/527,643 12/21/1999 2,301,793 75/530,644 12/21/1999 2,301,796 75/532,804 12/21/1999 2,301,797 75/532,902 12/21/1999 2,301,799 75/533,231 12/21/1999 2,301,803 75/534,200 12/21/1999 2,301,818 75/536,162 12/21/1999 2,301,819 75/536,190 12/21/1999 2,303,035 75/537,005 12/21/1999 2,301,827 75/537,687 12/21/1999 2,301,828 75/537,748 12/21/1999 2,301,829 75/537,783 12/21/1999 2,301,830 75/537,784 12/21/1999 2,301,831 75/537,997 12/21/1999 2,301,835 75/538,221 12/21/1999 2,301,837 75/538,710 12/21/1999 2,301,840 75/539,272 12/21/1999 2,301,845 75/541,300 12/21/1999 2,303,036 75/542,414 12/21/1999 2,301,850 75/542,517 12/21/1999 2,302,950 75/543,045 12/21/1999 2,301,873 75/546,727 12/21/1999 2,301,892 75/550,695 12/21/1999 2,301,896 75/551,066 12/21/1999 2,301,900 75/551,620 12/21/1999 2,303,041 75/552,504 12/21/1999 2,303,043 75/553,173 12/21/1999 2,301,919 75/554,038 12/21/1999 2,301,926 75/555,874 12/21/1999 2,301,928 75/556,425 12/21/1999 2,301,930 75/556,602 12/21/1999 2,301,936 75/557,311 12/21/1999 2,301,939 75/557,520 12/21/1999 2,301,953 75/559,927 12/21/1999 2,301,958 75/560,508 12/21/1999 2,301,959 75/560,805 12/21/1999 2,302,959 75/561,514 12/21/1999 2,301,979 75/565,013 12/21/1999 2,301,981 75/565,412 12/21/1999 2,302,960 75/566,270 12/21/1999 2,301,990 75/566,385 12/21/1999 2,302,008 75/568,549 12/21/1999 2,302,012 75/569,806 12/21/1999 2,302,013 75/570,096 12/21/1999 2,302,017 75/571,035 12/21/1999 2,302,021 75/571,526 12/21/1999 2,302,022 75/571,729 12/21/1999 2,302,029 75/573,129 12/21/1999 2,302,031 75/573,187 12/21/1999 2,302,039 75/574,082 12/21/1999 2,302,043 75/574,270 12/21/1999 2,302,046 75/575,088 12/21/1999
August 17, 2010 | US PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE | 1357 OG 176 |
2,303,054 75/577,921 12/21/1999 2,302,062 75/578,058 12/21/1999 2,302,065 75/578,315 12/21/1999 2,302,071 75/579,206 12/21/1999 2,302,073 75/579,552 12/21/1999 2,302,074 75/579,608 12/21/1999 2,302,078 75/579,991 12/21/1999 2,302,086 75/582,733 12/21/1999 2,302,090 75/583,471 12/21/1999 2,302,091 75/583,476 12/21/1999 2,302,093 75/583,544 12/21/1999 2,302,094 75/583,564 12/21/1999 2,302,096 75/583,602 12/21/1999 2,302,097 75/583,628 12/21/1999 2,302,101 75/584,416 12/21/1999 2,302,108 75/585,671 12/21/1999 2,302,109 75/585,735 12/21/1999 2,302,111 75/585,976 12/21/1999 2,302,115 75/587,583 12/21/1999 2,302,139 75/591,126 12/21/1999 2,302,140 75/591,326 12/21/1999 2,302,142 75/591,392 12/21/1999 2,302,152 75/593,343 12/21/1999 2,302,159 75/594,610 12/21/1999 2,302,160 75/594,842 12/21/1999 2,302,176 75/600,208 12/21/1999 2,302,211 75/616,553 12/21/1999 2,302,226 75/623,374 12/21/1999 2,302,237 75/626,489 12/21/1999 2,302,239 75/626,905 12/21/1999 2,302,249 75/631,068 12/21/1999 2,302,272 75/641,476 12/21/1999 2,302,276 75/643,781 12/21/1999 2,302,279 75/644,968 12/21/1999 2,302,283 75/645,304 12/21/1999 2,303,068 75/645,561 12/21/1999 2,302,285 75/646,437 12/21/1999 2,302,291 75/648,781 12/21/1999 2,302,304 75/667,830 12/21/1999
Top of Notices August 17, 2010 | US PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE | Print This Notice 1357 OG 177 |
Service by Publication Notice and Order Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 11.24 |
Service by Publication Notice and Order Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 11.24 Preface Via a March 17, 2010, Service by Publication appearing in the April 13 and 20, 2010, editions of the Official Gazette, James O. Okorafor was duly served with (1) a Request for Notice and Order Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 11.24; (2) a Complaint for Reciprocal Discipline Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 11.24; (3) a copy of the August 10, 2009, Agreed Judgment of Probated Suspension, issued by the District Court of Harris County, Texas, 113th Judicial District in Comm'n for Lawyer Discipline v. James O. Okorafor (Cause No. 2008-33657) suspending Mr. Okorafor from the practice of law for a period of twelve months, with the suspension being fully probated pursuant to stated terms of probation included therein; and (4) a proposed Notice and Order Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 11.24. Those four documents initiated a reciprocal disciplinary complaint against Mr. Okorafor before the Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Service by Publication of Notice and Order Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 11.24 On June 10, 2010, a Notice and Order Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 11.24 ("Notice and Order") was issued and, in accordance with 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.24(b) and 11.35, the Notice and Order, the Complaint for Reciprocal Discipline Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 11.24, and a copy of the August 10, 2009, Agreed Judgment of Probated Suspension, issued by the District Court of Harris County, Texas, 113th Judicial District in Comm'n for Lawyer Discipline v. James O. Okorafor (Cause No. 2008-33657) were attempted to be served on Mr. Okorafor by first-class certified mail, return receipt requested, to a post office box address in Houston, Texas, which was the most recent address provided by Mr. Okorafor to the Office of Enrollment and Discipline pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 11.11. The mailing was returned with the explanation that it was "unclaimed." Mr. Okorafor is hereby notified through this publication that he may obtain a copy of the Notice and Order, the Complaint for Reciprocal Discipline Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 11.24, and a copy of the August 10, 2009, Agreed Judgment of Probated Suspension, issued by the District Court of Harris County, Texas, 113th Judicial District in Comm'n for Lawyer Discipline v. James O. Okorafor (Cause No. 2008-33657) by sending a written request addressed to: General Counsel, United States Patent and Trademark Office, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450. July 19, 2010 HARRY I. MOATZ Director of Enrollment and Discipline United States Patent and Trademark Office
Top of Notices August 17, 2010 | US PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE | Print This Notice 1357 OG 178 |
37 CFR 1.47 Notice by Publication |
37 CFR 1.47 Notice by Publication Notice is hereby given of the filing of an application with a petition under 37 CFR 1.47 requesting acceptance of the application without the signature of all inventors. The petition has been granted. A notice has been sent to the last known address of the non-signing inventor. The inventor whose signature is missing (Paul Stark) may join in the application by promptly filing an appropriate oath or declaration complying with 37 CFR 1.63. The international application number is PCT/US2006/022597 and was filed on 09 June 2006 in the names of Gary LIVERSIDGE, Scott JENKINS, Paul STARK, NIALL M.N. FANNING, Gurvinder SINGH REKHI for the invention entitled MODIFIED RELEASE TICLOPIDINE COMPOSITIONS. The national stage application number is 11/569,481. 37 CFR 1.47 Notice of Publication Notice is hereby given of the filing of an application with a petition under 37 CFR 1.47 requesting acceptance of the application without the signature of all the inventors. The petition has been granted. A notice has been sent to the last known address of the non-signing inventor. The inventor whose signature is missing (Paolo MASSA) may join in the application by promptly filing an appropriate oath or declaration complying with 37 CFR 1.63. The international application number is PCT/EP2006/070114 and was filed 21 December 2006 in the names of Daniele TRENTINI and Paolo MASSA for the invention entitled NETWORK APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR TRANSLATING MEDIA ACCESS CONTROL ADDRESSES. The national stage number is 12/520,501 and has a 35 U.S.C. 371(c) date of 12 May 2010. 37 CFR 1.47 Notice by Publication Notice is hereby given of the filing of an application with a petition under 37 CFR 1.47 requesting acceptance of the application without the signature of all inventors. The petition has been granted. A notice has been sent to the last known address of the non-signing inventor. The inventor whose signature is missing (Daniel Paul Ruul) may join in the application by promptly filing an appropriate oath or declaration complying with 37 CFR 1.63. The international application number is PCT/AU2007/00684 and was filed on 18 May 2007 in the names of Andrew LOCH, Helen JOHNSON, Geoffrey TOOG and Daniel Paul RUUL for the invention entitled THE MANAGEMENT OF INVENTORY ALLOCATIONS. The national stage application number is 12/227,451. 37 CFR 1.47 Notice by Publication Notice is hereby given of the filing of an application with a petition under 37 CFR 1.47 requesting acceptance of the application without the signature of the inventor. The petition has been granted. A notice has been sent to the last known address of the non-signing inventor. The inventor whose signature is missing (Alexander Levin) may join in the application by promptly filing an appropriate oath or declaration complying with 37 CFR 1.63. The international application number is PCT/IL2006/001016 and was filed on 31 August 2006, in the names of Zvi Elgat and Alexander Levin for the invention entitled METHOD AND DEVICE FOR WASTE-WATER PURIFICATION. The national stage application number is 12/438,950 and has a 35 U.S.C. §371(c)(1), (c)(2) and (c)(4) date of 20 January 2010. 37 CFR 1.47 Notice of Publication Notice is hereby given of the filing of an application with a petition under 37 CFR 1.47 requesting acceptance of the application without the signature of all the inventors. The petition has been granted. A notice has been sent to the last known address of the non-signing inventor. The inventor whose signature is missing (Scott Christopher Waugaman) may join in the
August 17, 2010 | US PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE | 1357 OG 179 |
application by promptly filing an appropriate oath or declaration complying with 37 CFR 1.63. The international application number is PCT/GB2008/000682 and was filed 29 February 2008 in the names of Tomas Owen Gillo, Scott Christopher Waugaman and Mitchell Goodwin for the invention entitled ENTERTAINMENT DEVICE AND METHOD. The national stage number is 12/528,937 and has a 35 U.S.C. 371(c) date of 15 April 2010. 37 CFR 1.47 Notice of Publication Notice is hereby given of the filing of an application with a petition under 37 CFR 1.47 requesting acceptance of the application without the signature of all the inventors. The petition has been granted. A notice has been sent to the last known address of the non-signing inventor. The inventor whose signature is missing (Raymond P. Mendrola) may join in the application by promptly filing an appropriate oath or declaration complying with 37 CFR 1.63. The international application number is PCT/US2008/050855 and was filed 11 January 2008 in the names of David Hendrickson, Rodney Bleifuss, Raymond P. Mendrola, Clayton Van Scoy, Richard Kaminski James Bushman and Carl Sutherland for the invention entitled SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR COOLING AND REMOVING IRON FROM A HEARTH. The national stage number is 12/522,867 and has a 35 U.S.C. 371(c) date of 25 June 2010. 37 CFR 1.47 Notice of Publication Notice is hereby given of the filing of an application with a petition under 37 CFR 1.47 requesting acceptance of the application without the signature of all inventors. The petition has been granted. A notice has been sent to the last known address of the non-signing inventor. The inventor whose signature is missing (Jean-Marc LEBRUN) may join in the application by promptly filing an appropriate oath or declaration complying with 37 CFR 1.63. The international application number is PCT/IB2007/051458 and was filed on 26 February 2007 in the name of Jean-Marc Lebrun, and Philippe DAUDIN for the invention entitled CONNECTOR HAVING A SECURING PLUGGING FRONT GRID. The national stage application number is 12/449,755.
Top of Notices August 17, 2010 | US PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE | Print This Notice 1357 OG 180 |
37 CFR § 1.47 Notice by Publication |
37 CFR § 1.47 Notice by Publication Notice is hereby given of the filing of the following applications with a petition under 37 CFR § 1.47 requesting the acceptance of the application without the signature of all inventors or, if the inventor is deceased, the legal representative of the deceased inventor. The petition in each application has been granted. A notice has been sent to the last known address of the non-signing inventor or legal representative. The inventors or legal representatives whose signatures are missing may join in the application by promptly filing an oath or declaration complying with 37 CFR § 1.63. Non-Signing Inventor(s) Application Filing or Legal Title of No. Date Representative(s) Invention 29/314,831 May 1, 2009 Barlas Baylar Hanging Lamp 29/314,834 May 1, 2009 Barlas Baylar Wall Lamp 29/319,940 June 17, 2008 Christopher M. Johnson Cart 29/321,526 July 17, 2008 Kevin Fuller Cookie 11/559,525 Nov. 14, 2006 Jack Stephens Automated Insurance Brian Emmen Enrollment, Jeff Brown Underwriting, And Claims Adjusting 11/743,608 May 2, 2007 Stephen McCraith Modified Human Interferon-Beta Polypeptides 11/744,823 May 4, 2007 Yasser Bashir Visualizing And Sohaib Athar Manipulating Digital Omair Aslam Models For Dental Treatment 11/881,807 Jul. 27, 2007 Randy Haugen IV Securement Device And Cannulization Site Dressing 11/962,047 Dec. 20, 2007 Jeffrey Zhu Systems And Methods For A RFID Enabled Metal License Plate 12/103,713 Apr. 16, 2008 Andrew Newman Application Reputation Service 12/149,825 May 8, 2008 Joseph R. Byrum Nucleic Acid Molecules And Other Molecules Associated With Plants 12/154,020 May 20, 2008 Qiping Zhong Dry Powder Coating Of Metals, Oxides And Hydroxides Thereof 12/176,392 Jul. 20, 2008 Keisuke Mizuuchi Methods And Apparatus To Prevent Contamination Of A Photo-Resist Layer On A Substrate 12/203,538 Sep. 3, 2008 Yanfei Yang Method And System For
August 17, 2010 | US PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE | 1357 OG 181 |
Emergency Call 12/205,514 Sep. 5, 2008 Peter Nunan Patterned Assembly For Manufacturing A Solar Cell And A Method Thereof 12/210,225 Sep. 15, 2008 Ganesh Ananthnarayanan Asynchronous Queued Messaging For Web Applications 12/215,592 Jun. 26, 2008 Michael Bell Apparatus And Methods For Enforcement Of Policies Upon A Wireless Device 12/243,545 Oct. 1, 2008 Mathilde Benveniste Method And Apparatus Imposing Random Delays For Avoiding Hidden Terminal Collisions In Wireless Mesh Networks 12/277,383 Nov. 25, 2008 Mathilde Benveniste Method And Apparatus Performing Express Retransmission Of Frames 12/283,837 Sep. 16, 2008 Inho Song Method For Preventing Drive Wheels From Spinning 12/286,260 Sep. 29, 2008 Fatima Ehsan Hair Care Formulations Comprising UV Absorbers And Certain Silicone Derivatives 12/291,334 Nov. 7, 2008 Chancey Shey Hybrid Public/Private Jose Vasconcellos Wireless Network With Seamless Roaming 12/314,292 Dec. 8, 2008 Philip Doyle System And Method for Aggregation And Monitoring Of Multimedia Data Stored In A Decentralized Way 12/316,043 Dec. 9, 2008 Jan Majewski Multizone Capactive Anti-Pinch System 12/319,748 Jan 13, 2009 Sanjai Sinha Methods And Systems For Manufacturing Polycrystalline Silicon-Germanium Solar Cells 12/320,631 Jan. 30, 2009 Walid S. Saba Constructed Response Scoring Mechanism 12/323,629 Nov. 26, 2008 Manuel Marquez-Sanchez Smokeless Compressed Tobacco Product For Oral Consumption 12/327,435 Dec. 3, 2008 John Ronald Rice Low Pressure Paintball Guns
August 17, 2010 | US PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE | 1357 OG 182 |
12/334,113 Dec. 12, 2008 John Kremer Drug-Eluting Endoprosthesis 12/338,530 Dec. 18, 2008 Michael B. Maher Filter Including Randomly-Oriented Fibers For Reduction Of Particle Breakthrough 12/341,533 Dec. 22, 2008 Alessandro De Sanctis Method For Preventing Ping-Pong Handover Effect In Mobile Wimax Networks 12/344,115 Dec. 24, 2008 Richard E. Rowe Distributed Side Wagering Methods And Systems 12/345,111 Dec. 29, 2008 Yuching Liang Food Blending Apparatus And Method Of Control 12/351,405 Jan. 9, 2009 Peter Viski 9-Substituted Minocycline Compounds 12/354,310 Jan. 15, 2009 Robert C. Joyce Cellulosic Inclusion Thermoplastic Composition And Molding Thereof 12/359,911 Jan. 26, 2009 Chia-Lin Chuang Power Mesh Managing Method 12/364,459 Feb. 2, 2009 Fred Nesemeier Automated And Secure Data Collection For Securing And Managing Gaming Networks 12/366,007 Feb. 5, 2009 Chin Chu Lubricating Oil Compositions 12/370,343 Feb. 12, 2009 John D. Patton Graphical Certifications Of Online Advertisements Intended To Impact Click-Through Rates 12/370,395 Feb. 12, 2009 Gary A. Magnuson Method And System For Providing Price Protection In Conjunction With Goods Or Services 12/370,430 Feb. 12, 2009 Gary A. Magnuson Method And System For Providing Price Protection Related To The Purchase Of A Commodity 12/380,009 Feb. 20, 2009 Robert W. Rose System Method For Communicating Game Information 12/389,809 Feb. 20, 2009 Brian D. Leshin Intelligent Inter- Connect And Cross-
August 17, 2010 | US PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE | 1357 OG 183 |
Connect Patching System 12/398,075 Mar. 4, 2009 Eugene Sullivan Method And Apparatus Daniel R. Higgins For Improving Combustion In Recovery Boilers 12/408,247 Mar. 20, 2009 Jeffrey Nelson Network Based Operating System Across Devices 12/413,282 Mar. 27, 2009 James A. Raskowski Sliding Clutch In A Transmission 12/413,474 Mar. 27, 2009 Glyn Barry Smith Customer To Supplier Funds Transfer 12/413,476 Mar. 27, 2009 Glyn Barry Smith Funds Transfer Electronically 12/413,480 Mar. 27, 2009 Glyn Barry Smith Supplier Funds Reception Electronically 12/414,000 Mar. 30, 2009 Gregory Copeland Method And System For Crest Factor Reduction 12/423,341 Apr. 14, 2009 Manu Takebayashi Image Processing Apparatus, Image Processing Method, And Medium Storing Program Thereof 12/424,296 Apr. 15, 2009 Manu Takebayashi Image Processing Apparatus and Image Processing Method 12/432,530 Apr. 29, 2009 Nancy Levidow Surface Piercing Tidal Generator 12/465,666 May 14, 2009 Chrong-Jung Lin Optical Reflected Ya-Chin King Touch Panel And Pixels And System Thereof 12/472,650 May 27, 2009 Yaser Khalifa Non-Instrusive Appliance Load Identification Using Cascaded Cognitive Learning 12/476,555 Jun. 2, 2009 Valery Borovikov Projectile Propulsion System 12/485,241 Jun. 16, 2009 Tan C. Hoang Memory Array With Multiple-Event-Upset Hardening 12/495,378 Jun. 30, 2009 Mark Edward Kane Vital Speed Profile To Control A Train Moving Along A Track 12/533,664 Jul. 31, 2009 Lin Jiang Porous Polyimide Membrane, Battery Separator, Battery, And Method
Top of Notices August 17, 2010 | US PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE | Print This Notice 1357 OG 184 |
Registration to Practice |
Registration to Practice The following list contains the names of persons seeking for registration to practice before the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Final approval for registration is subject to establishing to the satisfaction of the Director of the Office of Enrollment and Discipline that the person seeking registration is of good moral character and repute. 37 CFR § 11.7 Accordingly, any information tending to affect the eligibility of any of the following persons on moral, ethical, or other grounds should be furnished to the Director of Enrollment and Discipline on or before September 3, 2010, at the following address: Mail Stop OED, United States Patent and Trademark Office, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22314 Andrews, Django Haven, Greenlee, Winner and Sullivan, P.C., 4875 Pearl East Circle, Suite 200, Boulder, CO 80301 Blass, Benjamin Eric, 1029 Clark Hill Drive, Eagleville, PA 19403 Campbell, Chet Donald, 4 Tupelo Lane, Savannah, GA 31411 Clark, Ryan Charles, 204 Applewood Drive, Pflugerville, TX 78660 Frank, Noah Samuel, United States Patent and Tradedmark Office, 400 Dulany Street, Remsen Bldg., Room 10A20, Alexandria, VA 22314 Gaines, Wilfred Scott, 2433 Vine Street, Cincinnati, OH 45219 Gau, Jack Ding-Jieh, 1078 Raven Place, Apartment #312, Wadsworth, OH 44281 Gray, Charles Frederick, McDonald Hopkins LLC, 600 Superior Avenue East, Suite 2100, Cleveland, OH 44114 Huang, Liang, 5642 Rudy Drive, San Jose, CA 95124 Johnson, Brian Peter, 1503 Oronoco Street, Alexandria, VA 22314 Kim, Joshua Ethan, Jones Day, 1755 Embarcadero Road, Palo Alto, CA 94303 Ko, Stephen Kwun Kwan, United States Patent andTrademark Office, 400 Dulany Street, Remsen Building, Suite 6D14, Alexandria, VA 22314 Lee, Natalie Alexandra, Buskop Law Group, 25001/2 Mandell, Houston, TX 77006 Lin, Clark Yannliang, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich and Rosati, 12235 El Camino Real, Suite 200, San Diego, CA 92130 Linder, Simon Harold, 5093 Woodbrae Court, Saratoga, CA 95070 Lynch, Eugene Joseph, Federal Election Commission, 999 E Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20463 Olson, Ken William, Intellectual Ventures, 11235 S.E. 6th Street, Bellevue, WA 98004 Parrish, Daniel Alexander, Apnex Medical Inc., 2890 Centre Pointe Drive, Roseville, MN 55113 Pua, Don Neil Caceres, Knobbe Martens, 2040 Main Street, 14th Floor, Irvine, CA 92614 Riesen, Michael Jason, Fraser, Clemens, Martin & Miller, LLC, 28366 Kensington Lane, Perrysburg, OH 43551 Ring, Christopher Kyle, 1707 Avents Ferry Road, Sanford, NC 27330
August 17, 2010 | US PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE | 1357 OG 185 |
Rubin, Neil Alan, Latham & Watkins LLP, 355 South Grand Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90071 Sauter, Emily Kristine, Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear, 2040 Main Street, Irvine, CA 92614 Scanzano, Edward Arthur, The Intaguo Group, 5366 Rucker Drive, San Jose, CA 95124 Sfekas, James Stephen, Perkins Coie LLP, 1201 3rd Avenue, Suite 4800, Seattle, WA 98101 Sommese, Bryan Joseph, Lerner, David, Littenberg, Krumholz & Mentlik, LLP, 1208 Palisade Avenue, Unit 1R, Union City, NJ 7087 Takahashi, Akio, Shinjyu Global IP Counselors LLP, 1233 Twentieth Street, N.W., Suite 700, Washington, DC 20036 Taylor II, James Wayne, 602 North Jordan Street, Apartment 402, Alexandria, VA 22304 Walker, Derek Xavier. 1924 East Gate Drive, Stone Mountain, GA 30087 Williams, Stefan Shannon, 743 Union Street, Rahway, Rahway, NJ 07065 Zuniga, Brandon Val, 3131 Timmons Lane, Apartment 719, Houston, TX 77027 July 20, 2010 HARRY I. MOATZ Director of Enrollment & Discipline
Top of Notices August 17, 2010 | US PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE | Print This Notice 1357 OG 186 |
Notice of Suspension |
Notice of Suspension Jackson Willard Snyder, II, of Potomac, Maryland, a registered patent attorney (Reg. No. 53,621). Mr. Snyder has been suspended for thirty-six (36) months by the United States Patent and Trademark Office ("USPTO" or "Office" for violating 37 C.F.R. §§ 10.23(a) and 10.23(b)(6), via 37 C.F.R. § 10.23(c) (5), by being suspended for a period of three (3) years from practice as an attorney on ethical grounds by a duly constituted authority of the State of Florida and by being suspended for a period of one (1) year and one (1) day from the practice as an attorney on ethical grounds by a duly constituted authority of the State of Virginia. Mr. Snyder's respective suspensions from the practice of law by the Supreme Court of Florida and the Virginia State Bar Disciplinary Board were predicated upon his pleading guilty to making false statements on a financial disclosure form and his subsequent criminal conviction in the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland. This action is taken pursuant to a settlement agreement between Mr. Snyder and the USPTO pursuant to the provisions of 35 U.S.C. §§ 2(b)(2)(D) and 32, and 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.26 and 11.59. Disciplinary decisions regarding practitioners are posted at the Office of Enrollment and Discipline's Reading Room electronically located at: http://des.uspto.gov/Foia/OEDReadingRoom.jsp. July 21, 2010 WILLIAM R. COVEY Deputy General Counsel United States Patent and Trademark Office on behalf of DAVID KAPPOS Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office Notice of Suspension James C. Weseman, of San Diego, CA, a registered patent attorney whose registration number is 30,507, has been suspended from practice of patent, trademark, and other non-patent law before the Office. The disciplinary complaint filed against Mr. Weseman alleged that he violated USPTO Disciplinary Rules 10.23(b)(5) by willfully failing to make good on returned checks he submitted, or caused to be submitted, to the USPTO in connection with patent applications he was prosecuting before the USPTO after receiving notice of the returned checks. The Administrative Law Judge (ALJ), having found that Mr. Weseman failed to file an answer, concluded that the allegations were deemed admitted, entered a default judgment and found Mr. Weseman had engaged in conduct in violation of § 10.23(b)(5). The ALJ entered an Initial Decision dated June 1, 2010, ordering Mr. Weseman be suspended for one-hundred twenty days. No appeal to the Director of United States Patent and Trademark Office has been filed. In the absence of a timely appeal, the Initial Decision becomes final and effective thirty days from the date of the Initial Decision. 37 CFR § 11.55(i). Mr. Weseman has been suspended as of Thursday, July 1, 2010, from practice before the United States Patent and Trademark Office. This action is taken pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 32, and 37 CFR §§ 11.55(i) and 11.59(a). Disciplinary decisions regarding registered practitioners are posted at the Office of Enrollment and Discipline's Reading Room accessible at: http://des.uspto.gov/Foia/OEDReadingRoom.jsp. July 6, 2010 HARRY I. MOATZ Director of Enrollment and Discipline
Top of Notices August 17, 2010 | US PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE | Print This Notice 1357 OG 187 |
Notice of Stayed Suspension |
Notice of Stayed Suspension Zachary Hamilton of South Holland, Illinois, registered patent attorney (Registration Number 39,212). The United States Patent and Trademark Office ("USPTO" or "Office") has suspended Mr. Hamilton for twenty-four months, with the entirety of the suspension stayed, and placed him on a twenty-four (24) month probation for violating 37 C.F.R. §§ 10.112 (a) and (b) by not maintaining separate accounts for client funds and business/operating expenses and for commingling client and business funds; 37 C.F.R. § 10.112(c)(3) by not maintaining complete records of client funds; 37 C.F.R. § 10.23(b)(4) by engaging in conduct involving misrepresentation by submitting checks to the USPTO that were drawn on insufficient funds; and 37 C.F.R. § 10.23(b)(6) by engaging in conduct that adversely reflects on his fitness to practice law by submitting checks that were returned for insufficient funds. Mr. Hamilton is permitted to practice before the Office during his probation unless the stay of the suspension is lifted. Mr. Hamilton maintained a client trust account, but he did not have a separate account for the business/operating transactions of his law practice. He deposited all business/operating funds into his client trust account. Mr. Hamilton did not keep formal accounting records for client funds he received. Additionally, from May 2006 through August 2008, Mr. Hamilton signed and submitted to the Office three (3) checks that were returned due to insufficient funds. The returned checks totaled seven hundred and twenty dollars ($720.00). Mr. Hamilton has made good on all outstanding checks and returned check fees, now has a client trust account, and has taken steps to ensure that the manner in which he handles client funds and his financial bookkeeping comply with USPTO Disciplinary Rules. This action is the result of a settlement agreement between Mr. Hamilton and the OED Director pursuant to the provisions of 35 U.S.C. §§ 2(b)(2)(D) and 32 and 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.26 and 11.59. Disciplinary decisions involving practitioners are posted at the Office of Enrollment and Discipline's Reading Room located at: http://des.uspto.gov/Foia/OEDReadingRoom.jsp. July 21, 2010 WILLIAM R. COVEY Deputy General Counsel United States Patent and Trademark Office on behalf of DAVID KAPPOS Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
Top of Notices August 17, 2010 | US PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE | Print This Notice 1357 OG 188 |
Interim Guidance for Determining Subject Matter Eligibility for Process Claims in View of Bilski v. Kappos |
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE United States Patent and Trademark Office [Docket No. PTO-P-2010-0067] Interim Guidance for Determining Subject Matter Eligibility for Process Claims in View of Bilski v. Kappos AGENCY: United States Patent and Trademark Office, Commerce. ACTION: Notice; Request for comments. SUMMARY: The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO or Office) has prepared Interim Guidance for Determining Subject Matter Eligibility for Process Claims in view of Bilski v. Kappos (Interim Bilski Guidance) for its personnel to use when determining subject matter eligibility under 35 U.S.C. 101 in view of the recent decision by the United States Supreme Court (Supreme Court) in Bilski v. Kappos, No. 08-964 (June 28, 2010). It is intended to be used by Office personnel as a supplement to the previously issued Interim Examination Instructions for Evaluating Subject Matter Eligibility Under 35 U.S.C. 101 dated August 24, 2009 (Interim Instructions) and the memorandum to the Patent Examining Corps on the Supreme Court Decision in Bilski v. Kappos dated June 28, 2010. This guidance supersedes previous guidance on subject matter eligibility that conflicts with the Interim Bilski Guidance. Any member of the public may submit written comments on the Interim Bilski Guidance. The Office is especially interested in receiving comments regarding the scope and extent of the holding in Bilski. DATES: The Interim Bilski Guidance is effective July 27, 2010. This guidance applies to all applications filed before, on or after the effective date of July 27, 2010. Comment Deadline Date: To be ensured of consideration, written comments must be received on or before September 27, 2010. No public hearing will be held. ADDRESSES: Comments concerning this Interim Bilski Guidance should be sent by electronic mail message over the Internet addressed to Bilski_Guidance@uspto.gov or facsimile transmitted to (571) 273-0125. Comments may also be submitted by mail addressed to: Mail Stop Comments - Patents, Commissioner for Patents, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-1450. Although comments may be submitted by facsimile or mail, the Office prefers to receive comments via the Internet. The comments will be available for public inspection at the Office of the Commissioner for Patents, located in Madison East, Tenth Floor, 600 Dulany Street, Alexandria, Virginia, and will be available via the USPTO Internet Web site, (address: http://www.uspto.gov). Because comments will be available for public inspection, information that is not desired to be made public, such as an address or phone number, should not be included in the comments. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Caroline D. Dennison, Legal Advisor, Office of Patent Legal Administration, Office of the Associate Commissioner for Patent Examination Policy, by telephone at (571) 272-7729, or by mail addressed to: Mail Stop Comments - Patents, Commissioner for Patents, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-1450, marked to the attention of Caroline D. Dennison. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The USPTO has prepared interim guidance (Interim Bilski Guidance) for its personnel to use when determining subject matter eligibility under 35 U.S.C. 101 in view of the recent decision by the United States Supreme Court (Supreme Court) in Bilski. It is intended to be used by Office personnel as a supplement to the previously issued Interim Examination Instructions for Evaluating Subject Matter Eligibility Under 35
August 17, 2010 | US PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE | 1357 OG 189 |
U.S.C. 101 dated August 24, 2009 (Interim Instructions) and the memorandum to the Patent Examining Corps on the Supreme Court Decision in Bilski v. Kappos dated June 28, 2010. The Interim Bilski Guidance is based on the USPTO's current understanding of the law and is believed to be fully consistent with the decision in Bilski, the binding precedent of the Supreme Court, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (Federal Circuit) and the Federal Circuit's predecessor courts. The USPTO has also posted the Interim Bilski Guidance on its Internet Web site (http://www.uspto.gov). Request for Comments The Office has received and considered the comments regarding the Interim Instructions submitted in response to the Request for Comments on Interim Examination Instructions for Evaluating Patent Subject Matter Eligibility, 74 FR 47780 (Sept. 11, 2009), 1347 Off. Gaz. Pat. Office 110 (Oct. 13, 2009). See also Additional Period for Comments on Interim Examination Instructions for Evaluating Patent Subject Matter Eligibility, 74 FR 52184 (Oct. 9, 2009), 1348 Off. Gaz. Pat. Office 42 (Nov. 3, 2009) (extending the comment period until November 9, 2009). Members of the public are invited to review the Interim Bilski Guidance (below) and provide comments. The Office is particularly interested in receiving comments in response to the following questions: 1. What are examples of claims that do not meet the machine-or- transformation test but nevertheless remain patent-eligible because they do not recite an abstract idea? 2. What are examples of claims that meet the machine-or-transformation test but nevertheless are not patent-eligible because they recite an abstract idea? 3. The decision in Bilski suggested that it might be possible to "defin[e] a narrower category or class of patent applications that claim to instruct how business should be conducted," such that the category itself would be unpatentable as "an attempt to patent abstract ideas." Bilski slip op. at 12. Do any such "categories" exist? If so, how does the category itself represent an "attempt to patent abstract ideas?" Interim Guidance for Determining Subject Matter Eligibility for Process Claims in view of Bilski v. Kappos (Interim Bilski Guidance) I. Overview: This Interim Bilski Guidance is for determining patent-eligibility of process claims under 35 U.S.C. 101 in view of the opinion by the Supreme Court in Bilski v. Kappos, 561 U.S. - - - (2010), which refined the abstract idea exception to subject matter that is eligible for patenting. A claim to an abstract idea is not a patent-eligible process. This Interim Bilski Guidance provides factors to consider in determining subject matter eligibility of method claims in view of the abstract idea exception. Although this guidance presents a change in existing examination practice, it is anticipated that subject matter eligibility determinations will not increase in complexity for the large majority of examiners, who do not routinely encounter claims that implicate the abstract idea exception. Under the principles of compact prosecution, each claim should be reviewed for compliance with every statutory requirement for patentability in the initial review of the application, even if one or more claims are found to be deficient with respect to the patent-eligibility requirement of 35 U.S.C. 101. Thus, Office personnel should state all non-cumulative reasons and bases for rejecting claims in the first Office action. Section III of this Interim Bilski Guidance provides guidance on the abstract idea exception to subject matter eligibility as set forth in Bilski, and section IV of this Interim Bilski Guidance provides
August 17, 2010 | US PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE | 1357 OG 190 |
guidance on factors relevant to reviewing method claims for subject matter eligibility in view of Bilski. To aid examiners in implementing this guidance, a summary sheet of factors which may be useful for determining subject matter eligibility of a method claim is provided at the end of this Interim Bilski Guidance. Section V of this Interim Bilski Guidance discusses how to make the determination of eligibility. To summarize, in order for the examiner to make a proper prima facie case of ineligibility, the examiner will evaluate the claim as a whole and weigh the relevant factors set forth in Bilski and previous Supreme Court precedent and make a determination of compliance with the subject matter eligibility prong of § 101. The Office will then consider rebuttal arguments and evidence supporting subject matter ligibility. II. Summary: The Bilski Court underscored that the text of § 101 is expansive, specifying four independent categories of inventions eligible for protection, including processes, machines, manufactures, and compositions of matter. See slip op. at 4 ("In choosing such expansive terms * * * modified by the comprehensive `any', Congress plainly contemplated that the patent laws would be given wide scope.") (quoting Diamond v. Chakrabarty, 447 U.S. 303, 308 (1980)). The Court also made clear that business methods are not "categorically outside of § 101's scope," stating that "a business method is simply one kind of `method' that is, at least in some circumstances, eligible for patenting under § 101." Id. at 10-11. Examiners are reminded that § 101 is not the sole tool for determining patentability; where a claim encompasses an abstract idea, sections 102, 103, and 112 will provide additional tools for ensuring that the claim meets the conditions for patentability. As the Court made clear in Bilski: The § 101 patent-eligibility inquiry is only a threshold test. Even if an invention qualifies as a process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, in order to receive the Patent Act's protection the claimed invention must also satisfy "the conditions and requirements of this title." § 101. Those requirements include that the invention be novel, see § 102, nonobvious, see § 103, and fully and particularly described, see § 112. Id. at 5. Therefore, examiners should avoid focusing on issues of patent- eligibility under § 101 to the detriment of considering an application for compliance with the requirements of §§ 102, 103, and 112, and should avoid treating an application solely on the basis of patent-eligibility under § 101 except in the most extreme cases. III. The Abstract Idea Exception to Subject Matter Eligibility: There are limits on the scope of patent-eligibility. In particular, the Supreme Court has identified three specific exceptions to § 101's broad patent-eligibility principles: Laws of nature, physical phenomena, and abstract ideas. See id. The Office has been using the so-called "machine-or-transformation" test used by the Federal Circuit to evaluate whether a method claim qualifies as a statutory patent-eligible process. See Interim Examination Instructions For Evaluating Subject Matter Eligibility Under 35 U.S.C. 101 dated August 24, 2009 ("2009 Interim Instructions"). The Supreme Court stated in Bilski that the machine-or-transformation test is a "useful and important clue" and "investigative tool" for determining whether some claimed methods are statutory processes, but it "is not the sole test for deciding whether an invention is a patent-eligible `process.'" Slip op. at 8. Its primary objection was to the elevation of the machine-or-transformation test - which it considered to be "atextual" - as the "sole test" for patent-eligibility. Slip op. at 6-8, 16. To date, no court, presented with a subject matter eligibility issue, has ever ruled that a method claim that lacked a machine
August 17, 2010 | US PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE | 1357 OG 191 |
or a transformation was patent-eligible. However, Bilski held open the possibility that some claims that do not meet the machine-or-transformation test might nevertheless be patent-eligible. Prior to adoption of the machine-or-transformation test, the Office had used the "abstract idea" exception in cases where a claimed "method" did not sufficiently recite a physical instantiation. See, e.g., Ex parte Bilski, No. 2002-2257, slip op. at 46-49 (B.P.A.I. Sept. 26, 2006) (informative), http://www.uspto.gov/ip/boards/bpai/decisions/ inform/fd022257.pdf. Following Bilski, such an approach remains proper. A claim that attempts to patent an abstract idea is ineligible subject matter under 35 U.S.C. 101. See slip op. at 13 ("[A]ll members of the Court agree that the patent application at issue here falls outside of § 101 because it claims an abstract idea."). The abstract idea exception has deep roots in the Supreme Court's jurisprudence. See id. at 5 (citing Le Roy v. Tatham, 55 U.S. (14 How.) 156, 174-175 (1853)). Bilski reaffirmed Diehr's holding that "while an abstract idea, law of nature, or mathematical formula could not be patented, `an application of a law of nature or mathematical formula to a known structure or process may well be deserving of patent protection.'" Id. at 14 (quoting Diamond v. Diehr, 450 U.S. 175, 187 (1981)) (emphasis in original). The recitation of some structure, such as a machine, or the recitation of some transformative component will in most cases limit the claim to such an application. However, not all such recitations necessarily save the claim: "Flook established that limiting an abstract idea to one field of use or adding token postsolution components did not make the concept patentable." Id. at 15. Moreover, the fact that the steps of a claim might occur in the "real world" does not necessarily save it from a section 101 rejection. Thus, the Bilski claims were said to be drawn to an "abstract idea" despite the fact that they included steps drawn to initiating transactions. The "abstractness" is in the sense that there are no limitations as to the mechanism for entering into the transactions. Consistent with the foregoing, Bilski holds that the following claim is abstract: 1. A method for managing the consumption risk costs of a commodity sold by a commodity provider at a fixed price comprising the steps of: (a) Initiating a series of transactions between said commodity provider and consumers of said commodity wherein said consumers purchase said commodity at a fixed rate based upon historical averages, said fixed rate corresponding to a risk position of said consumer; (b) Identifying market participants for said commodity having a counter-risk position to said consumers; and (c) Initiating a series of transactions between said commodity provider and said market participants at a second fixed rate such that said series of market participant transactions balances the risk position of said series of consumer transactions. Specifically, the Court explains: The concept of hedging, described in claim 1 and reduced to a mathematical formula in claim 4, is an unpatentable abstract idea, just like the algorithms at issue in Benson and Flook. Allowing petitioners to patent risk hedging would preempt use of this approach in all fields, and would effectively grant a monopoly over an abstract idea. Slip op. at 15. Bilski also held that the additional, narrowing, limitations in the dependent claims were mere field of use limitations or insignificant postsolution components, and that adding these limitations did not make the claims patent-eligible. See id. Claims 1-9 in Bilski are attached as examples of claims that run afoul of the abstract idea exception.
August 17, 2010 | US PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE | 1357 OG 192 |
The day after deciding Bilski, the Supreme Court denied certiorari in Ferguson v. Kappos, U.S. Supreme Court No. 09-1501, while granting, vacating, and remanding two other Federal Circuit section 101 cases. The denial of certiorari left intact the rejection of all of Ferguson's claims. Although the Federal Circuit had applied the machine-or- transformation test to reject Ferguson's process claims, the Supreme Court's disposition of Ferguson makes it likely that the Ferguson claims also run afoul of the abstract idea exception. A representative Ferguson claim is: 1. A method of marketing a product, comprising: Developing a shared marketing force, said shared marketing force including at least marketing channels, which enable marketing a number of related products; Using said shared marketing force to market a plurality of different products that are made by a plurality of different autonomous producing company [sic], so that different autonomous companies, having different ownerships, respectively produce said related products; Obtaining a share of total profits from each of said plurality of different autonomous producing companies in return for said using; and Obtaining an exclusive right to market each of said plurality of products in return for said using. The following guidance presents factors that are to be considered when evaluating patent-eligibility of method claims. The factors include inquiries from the machine-or-transformation test, which remains a useful investigative tool, and inquiries gleaned from Supreme Court precedent. While the Supreme Court in Bilski did not set forth detailed guidance, there are many factors to be considered when determining whether there is sufficient evidence to support a determination that a method claim is directed to an abstract idea. The following factors are intended to be useful examples and are not intended to be exclusive or limiting. It is recognized that new factors may be developed, particularly for emerging technologies. It is anticipated that the factors will be modified and changed to take into account developments in precedential case law and to accommodate prosecution issues that may arise in implementing this new practice. Additional guidance in the form of expanded explanation and specific examples will follow in due course. IV. Evaluating Method Claims for Eligibility: Where the claim is written in the form of a method and is potentially a patentable process, as defined in 35 U.S.C. 100(b), the claim is patent-eligible so long as it is not disqualified as one of the exceptions to § 101's broad patent-eligibility principles; i.e., laws of nature, physical phenomena, and abstract ideas. Taking into account the following factors, the examiner should determine whether the claimed invention, viewed as a whole, is disqualified as being a claim to an abstract idea. Relevant factors - both those in favor of patent-eligibility and those against such a finding - should be weighed in making the determination. Factors that weigh in favor of patent-eligibility satisfy the criteria of the machine-or-transformation test or provide evidence that the abstract idea has been practically applied. Factors that weigh against patent-eligibility neither satisfy the criteria of the machine-or- transformation test nor provide evidence that the abstract idea has been practically applied. Each case will present different factors, and it is likely that only some of the factors will be present in each application. It would be improper to make a conclusion based on one factor while ignoring
August 17, 2010 | US PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE | 1357 OG 193 |
other factors. This additional guidance, which builds upon the 2009 Interim Instructions, is a factor-based inquiry. Although the following approach is a change, it is anticipated that subject matter eligibility determinations will not increase in complexity, particularly for examiners who do not routinely encounter claims that implicate the abstract idea exception. Examiners will recognize that the machine-or-transformation test set forth in Section II(B) of the 2009 Interim Instructions, although not the sole test for evaluating the subject matter eligibility of a method claim, is still pertinent in making determinations pursuant to the factors listed below. Examiners are referred to the summary sheet of factors provided at the end of this Interim Bilski Guidance which may be useful in determining subject matter eligibility of a method claim. Factors To Be Considered in an Abstract Idea Determination of a Method Claim A. Whether the method involves or is executed by a particular machine or apparatus. If so, the claims are less likely to be drawn to an abstract idea; if not, they are more likely to be so drawn. Where a machine or apparatus is recited or inherent in a patent claim, the following factors are relevant: (1) The particularity or generality of the elements of the machine or apparatus; i.e., the degree to which the machine in the claim can be specifically identified (not any and all machines). Incorporation of a particular machine or apparatus into the claimed method steps weighs toward eligibility. (2) Whether the machine or apparatus implements the steps of the method. Integral use of a machine or apparatus to achieve performance of the method weighs toward eligibility, as compared to where the machine or apparatus is merely an object on which the method operates, which weighs against eligibility. (3) Whether its involvement is extrasolution activity or a field- of-use, i.e., the extent to which (or how) the machine or apparatus imposes meaningful limits on the execution of the claimed method steps. Use of a machine or apparatus that contributes only nominally or insignificantly to the execution of the claimed method (e.g., in a data gathering step or in a field-of-use limitation) would weigh against eligibility. B. Whether performance of the claimed method results in or otherwise involves a transformation of a particular article. If such a transformation exists, the claims are less likely to be drawn to an abstract idea; if not, they are more likely to be so drawn. Where a transformation occurs, the following factors are relevant: (1) The particularity or generality of the transformation. A more particular transformation would weigh in favor of eligibility. (2) The degree to which the recited article is particular; i.e., can be specifically identified (not any and all articles). A transformation applied to a generically recited article would weigh against eligibility. (3) The nature of the transformation in terms of the type or extent of change in state or thing, for instance by having a different function or use, which would weigh toward eligibility, compared to merely having a different location, which would weigh against eligibility. (4) The nature of the article transformed, i.e., whether it is an object or substance, weighing toward eligibility, compared to a concept such as a contractual obligation or mental judgment, which would weigh
August 17, 2010 | US PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE | 1357 OG 194 |
against eligibility. (5) Whether its involvement is extrasolution activity or a field- of-use, i.e., the extent to which (or how) the transformation imposes meaningful limits on the execution of the claimed method steps. A transformation that contributes only nominally or insignificantly to the execution of the claimed method (e.g., in a data gathering step or in a field-of-use limitation) would weigh against eligibility. C. Whether performance of the claimed method involves an application of a law of nature, even in the absence of a particular machine, apparatus, or transformation. If such an application exists, the claims are less likely to be drawn to an abstract idea; if not, they are more likely to be so drawn. Where such an application is present, the following factors are relevant: (1) The particularity or generality of the application. Application of a law of nature having broad applicability across many fields of endeavor weighs against eligibility, such as where the claim generically recites an effect of the law of nature or claims every mode of accomplishing that effect, such that the claim would monopolize a natural force or patent a scientific fact. (As an example, claiming "the use of electromagnetism for transmitting signals at a distance.") (2) Whether the claimed method recites an application of a law of nature solely involving subjective determinations; e.g., ways to think about the law of nature. Application of a law of nature to a particular way of thinking about, or reacting to, a law of nature would weigh against eligibility. (3) Whether its involvement is extrasolution activity or a field- of-use, i.e., the extent to which (or how) the application imposes meaningful limits on the execution of the claimed method steps. An application of the law of nature that contributes only nominally or insignificantly to the execution of the claimed method (e.g., in a data gathering step or in a field-of-use limitation) would weigh against eligibility. D. Whether a general concept (which could also be recognized in such terms as a principle, theory, plan or scheme) is involved in executing the steps of the method. The presence of such a general concept can be a clue that the claim is drawn to an abstract idea. Where a general concept is present, the following factors are relevant: (1) The extent to which use of the concept, as expressed in the method, would preempt its use in other fields; i.e., that the claim would effectively grant a monopoly over the concept. (2) The extent to which the claim is so abstract and sweeping as to cover both known and unknown uses of the concept, and be performed through any existing or future-devised machinery, or even without any apparatus. (3) The extent to which the claim would effectively cover all possible solutions to a particular problem; i.e., that the claim is a statement of the problem versus a description of a particular solution to the problem. (4) Whether the concept is disembodied or whether it is instantiated; i.e., implemented, in some tangible way. Note, however, that limiting an abstract idea to one field of use or adding token postsolution components does not make the concept patentable. A concept that is well-instantiated weighs in favor of eligibility. (5) The mechanism(s) by which the steps are implemented; e.g.,
August 17, 2010 | US PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE | 1357 OG 195 |
whether the performance of the process is observable and verifiable rather than subjective or imperceptible. Steps that are observable and verifiable weigh in favor of eligibility. (6) Examples of general concepts include, but are not limited to: Basic economic practices or theories (e.g., hedging, insurance, financial transactions, marketing); Basic legal theories (e.g., contracts, dispute resolution, rules of law); Mathematical concepts (e.g., algorithms, spatial relationships, geometry); Mental activity (e.g., forming a judgment, observation, evaluation, or opinion); Interpersonal interactions or relationships (e.g., conversing, dating); Teaching concepts (e.g., memorization, repetition); Human behavior (e.g., exercising, wearing clothing, following rules or instructions); Instructing "how business should be conducted," Bilski, slip op. at 12. V. Making the Determination of Eligibility: Each of the factors relevant to the particular patent application should be weighed to determine whether the method is claiming an abstract idea by covering a general concept, or combination of concepts, or whether the method is limited to a particular practical application of the concept. The presence or absence of a single factor will not be determinative as the relevant factors need to be considered and weighed to make a proper determination as to whether the claim as a whole is drawn to an abstract idea such that the claim would effectively grant a monopoly over an abstract idea and be ineligible for patent protection. If the factors indicate that the method claim is not merely covering an abstract idea, the claim is eligible for patent protection under § 101 and must be further evaluated for patentability under all of the statutory requirements, including utility and double patenting (§ 101); novelty (§ 102); non-obviousness (§ 103); and definiteness and adequate description, enablement, and best mode (§ 112). Section 101 is merely a coarse filter and thus a determination of eligibility under § 101 is only a threshold question for patentability. Sections 102, 103, and 112 are typically the primary tools for evaluating patentability unless the claim is truly abstract, see, e.g., Bilski, slip op. at 12 ("[S]ome business method patents raise special problems in terms of vagueness and suspect validity."). If the factors indicate that the method claim is attempting to cover an abstract idea, the examiner will reject the claim under § 101, providing clear rationale supporting the determination that an abstract idea has been claimed, such that the examiner establishes a prima facie case of patent- ineligibility. The conclusion made by the examiner must be based on the evidence as a whole. In making a rejection or if presenting reasons for allowance when appropriate, the examiner should specifically point out the factors that are relied upon in making the determination. If a claim is rejected under § 101 on the basis that it is drawn to an abstract idea, the applicant then has the opportunity to explain why the claimed method is not drawn to an abstract idea. Specifically identifying the factors used in the analysis will allow the applicant to make specific arguments in response to the rejection if the applicant believes that the conclusion that the claim is directed to an abstract idea is in error.
August 17, 2010 | US PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE | 1357 OG 196 |
The Interim Bilski Guidance is for examination guidance in light of the recent decision in Bilski. This guidance does not constitute substantive rule making and hence does not have the force and effect of law. Rejections will continue to be based upon the substantive law, and it is these rejections that are appealable. Consequently, any perceived failure by Office personnel to follow this guidance is neither appealable nor petitionable. The Interim Bilski Guidance merely updates USPTO examination practice for consistency with the USPTO's current understanding of the case law regarding patent subject matter eligibility under 35 U.S.C. 101 in light of Bilski. Therefore, the Interim Bilski Guidance relates only to interpretative rules, general statements of policy, or rules of agency organization, procedure, or practice. The USPTO is providing this opportunity for public comment because the USPTO desires the benefit of public comment on the Interim Bilski Guidance; however, notice and an opportunity for public comment are not required under 5 U.S.C. 553(b) or any other law. See Cooper Techs. Co. v. Dudas, 536 F.3d 1330, 1336-37, 87 U.S.P.Q.2d 1705, 1710 (Fed. Cir. 2008) (stating that 5 U.S.C. 553, and thus 35 U.S.C. 2(b)(2)(B), does not require notice and comment rule making for "`interpretative rules, general statements of policy, or rules of agency organization, procedure, or practice."' (quoting 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(A))). Persons submitting written comments should note that the USPTO may not provide a "comment and response" analysis of such comments as notice and an opportunity for public comment are not required under 5 U.S.C. 553(b) or any other law. July 4, 2010 DAVID J. KAPPOS Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office Bilski Claims 1. A method for managing the consumption risk costs of a commodity sold by a commodity provider at a fixed price comprising the steps of: (a) Initiating a series of transactions between said commodity provider and consumers of said commodity wherein said consumers purchase said commodity at a fixed rate based upon historical averages, said fixed rate corresponding to a risk position of said consumers; (b) Identifying market participants for said commodity having a counter-risk position to said consumers; and (c) Initiating a series of transactions between said commodity provider and said market participants at a second fixed rate such that said series of market participant transactions balances the risk position of said series of consumer transactions. 2. The method of claim 1 wherein said commodity is energy and said market participants are transmission distributors. 3. The method of claim 2 wherein said consumption risk is a weather-related price risk. 4. The method of claim 3 wherein the fixed price for the consumer transaction is determined by the relationship: Fixed Bill Price = Fi + [(Ci + Ti+ LDi) x ([alpha] + [szlig]E(Wi)] wherein, Fi = fixed costs in period i;
August 17, 2010 | US PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE | 1357 OG 197 |
Ci = variable costs in period i; Ti = variable long distance transportation costs in period i; LDi = variable local delivery costs in period i; E(Wi) = estimated location-specific weather indicator in period i; and [alpha] and [beta] are constants. 5. The method of claim 4 wherein said location-specific weather indicator is at least one of heating degree days and cooling degree days. 6. The method of claim 4 wherein said energy provider seeks a swap receipt to cover the marginal weather-driven cost. 7. The method of claim 4 wherein the energy price is determined by the steps of: (a) Evaluating the usage and all costs for a prospective transaction; (b) Performing a Monte Carlo simulation across all transactions at all locations for a predetermined plurality of years of weather patterns and establishing the payoffs from each transaction under each historical weather pattern; (c) Assuming that the summed payoffs are normally distributed; (d) Performing one-tail tests to determine the marginal likelihood of losing money on the deal and the marginal likelihood of retaining at least the design margin included in the initial evaluation of the fixed bill price; and (e) Adjusting the margin of the fixed bill price if the transaction as initially priced leads to a reduced expected margin or increases the likelihood of a loss until the expected portfolio margin and the likelihood of portfolio loss is acceptable. 8. The method of claim 4 wherein a cap on the weather-influenced pricing is established by the steps of: (a) Evaluating the usage equation and all costs for a prospective transaction; (b) Performing a Monte Carlo simulation across all transactions at all locations for a predetermined plurality of years of weather patterns and establishing the payoffs from each transaction under each historical weather pattern assuming that the price in the transaction being priced floats down when the weather is below normal; (c) Assuming that the summed payoffs are normally distributed; (d) Performing one-tail tests to determine the marginal likelihood of losing money on the transaction and the marginal likelihood of retaining at least the design margin included in the initial evaluation of the fixed price bill; (e) Continuing to reprice the margin in the transaction until the expected portfolio margin and likelihood of portfolio loss is acceptable; and (f) Establishing the margin as a call option on weather at a predetermined location. 9. The method of claim 1 wherein said commodity provider seeks a swap receipt to cover the price risk of the consumer transaction. 101 Method Eligibility Quick Reference Sheet The factors below should be considered when analyzing the claim as a whole to evaluate whether a method claim is directed to an abstract idea. However, not every factor will be relevant to every claim and, as such, need not be considered in every analysis. When it is determined that the claim is patent-eligible, the analysis may be concluded. In those instances where patent-eligibility cannot easily be identified, every relevant factor should be carefully weighed before making a conclusion. Additionally, no factor is conclusive by itself, and the weight accorded each factor will vary based upon the facts of the application. These factors are not intended to be exclusive or exhaustive as there may be more
August 17, 2010 | US PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE | 1357 OG 198 |
pertinent factors depending on the particular technology of the claim. For assistance in applying these factors, please consult the accompanying "Interim Guidance" memo and TC management. Factors Weighing Toward Eligibility Recitation of a machine or transformation (either express or inherent). [cir] Machine or transformation is particular. [cir] Machine or transformation meaningfully limits the execution of the steps. [cir] Machine implements the claimed steps. [cir] The article being transformed is particular. [cir] The article undergoes a change in state or thing (e.g., objectively different function or use). [cir] The article being transformed is an object or substance. The claim is directed toward applying a law of nature. [cir] Law of nature is practically applied. [cir] The application of the law of nature meaningfully limits the execution of the steps. The claim is more than a mere statement of a concept. [cir] The claim describes a particular solution to a problem to be solved. [cir] The claim implements a concept in some tangible way. [cir] The performance of the steps is observable and verifiable. Factors Weighing Against Eligibility No recitation of a machine or transformation (either express or inherent). Insufficient recitation of a machine or transformation. [cir] Involvement of machine, or transformation, with the steps is merely nominally, insignificantly, or tangentially related to the performance of the steps, e.g., data gathering, or merely recites a field in which the method is intended to be applied. [cir] Machine is generically recited such that it covers any machine capable of performing the claimed step(s). [cir] Machine is merely an object on which the method operates. [cir] Transformation involves only a change in position or location of article. [cir] "Article" is merely a general concept (see notes below). The claim is not directed to an application of a law of nature. [cir] The claim would monopolize a natural force or patent a scientific fact; e.g., by claiming every mode of producing an effect of that law of nature. [cir] Law of nature is applied in a merely subjective determination. [cir] Law of nature is merely nominally, insignificantly, or tangentially related to the performance of the steps. The claim is a mere statement of a general concept (see notes below for examples). [cir] Use of the concept, as expressed in the method, would effectively grant a monopoly over the concept. [cir] Both known and unknown uses of the concept are covered, and can be performed through any existing or future-devised machinery, or even without any apparatus. [cir] The claim only states a problem to be solved. [cir] The general concept is disembodied. [cir] The mechanism(s) by which the steps are implemented is subjective or imperceptible. Notes (1) Examples of general concepts include, but are not limited, to:
August 17, 2010 | US PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE | 1357 OG 199 |
Basic economic practices or theories (e.g., hedging, insurance, financial transactions, marketing); Basic legal theories (e.g., contracts, dispute resolution, rules of law); Mathematical concepts (e.g., algorithms, spatial relationships, geometry); Mental activity (e.g., forming a judgment, observation, evaluation, or opinion); Interpersonal interactions or relationships (e.g., conversing, dating); Teaching concepts (e.g., memorization, repetition); Human behavior (e.g., exercising, wearing clothing, following rules or instructions); Instructing "how business should be conducted." (2) For a detailed explanation of the terms machine, transformation, article, particular, extrasolution activity, and field-of-use, please refer to the Interim Patent Subject Matter Eligibility Examination Instructions oF August 24, 2009. (3) When making a subject matter eligibility determination, the relevant factors should be weighed with respect to the claim as a whole to evaluate whether the claim is patent-eligible or whether the abstract idea exception renders the claim ineligible. When it is determined that the claim is patent-eligible, the analysis may be concluded. In those instances where patent-eligibility cannot be easily identified, every relevant factor should be carefully weighed before making a conclusion. Not every factor will be relevant to every claim. While no factor is conclusive by itself, the weight accorded each factor will vary based upon the facts of the application. These factors are not intended to be exclusive or exhaustive as there may be more pertinent factors depending on the particular technology of the claim. (4) Sample Form Paragraphs: a. Based upon consideration of all of the relevant factors with respect the claim as a whole, claim(s) [1] held to claim an abstract idea, and is therefore rejected as ineligible subject matter under 35 U.S.C. 101. The rationale for this finding is explained below: [2] 1. In bracket 2, identify the decisive factors weighing against patent-eligibility, and explain the manner in which these factors support a conclusion of ineligibility. The explanation needs to be sufficient to establish a prima facie case of ineligibility under 35 U.S.C. 101. b. Dependent claim(s) [1] when analyzed as a whole are held to be ineligible subject matter and are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 because the additional recited limitation(s) fail(s) to establish that the claim is not directed to an abstract idea, as detailed below: [2] 1. In bracket 2, provide an explanation as to why the claim is directed to an abstract idea; for instance, that the additional limitations are no more than a field of use or merely involve insignificant extrasolution activity; e.g., data gathering. The explanation needs to be sufficient to establish a prima facie case of ineligibility under 35 U.S.C. 101.
Top of Notices August 17, 2010 | US PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE | Print This Notice 1357 OG 200 |
Disclaimer |
Disclaimer RE.40,667 E - Bruce Roth, San Jose, CA (US). [R-(R*R*)]-2-(4-FLUOROPHENYL)- á,ë-DIHYDROXY-5-(1-METHYLETHYL-3-PHENYL-4-[(PHENYLAMINO)CARBONYL]-1H-PYRROLE- 1-HEPTANOIC ACID, ITS LACTONE FORM AND SALTS THEREOF. Patent dated March 17, 2009. Disclaimer filed July 8, 2010, by the assignee, Warner-Lambert Company LLC. The term of this patent shall not extend beyond the expiration date of Patent No. 5,273,995.
Top of Notices August 17, 2010 | US PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE | Print This Notice 1357 OG 201 |
Errata |
Errata "All reference to 7,757,763 to Travis W. Cavender, et al of Angleton, TX for CASING DEFORMATION AND CONTROL FOR INCLUSION PROPAGATION appearing in the Official Gazette of July 20, 2010 should be deleted since no patent was granted." "All reference to Patent No. 7,758,191 to Yuichiro Kanazawa, et al of Okazaki-shi, Japan for OPTOTYPE PRESENTING APPARATUS appearing in the Official Gazette of July 20, 2010 should be deleted since no patent was granted." "All reference to Patent No. 7,758,252 to Aysunori Hayashi, et al of Tokyo, Japan for CAGE FOR ROLLER BEARING AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF appearing in the Official Gazette of July 20, 2010 should be deleted since no patent was granted." "All reference to Patent No. 7,758,391 to Takeshi Aizawa of Yokkaichi-shi, Japan for JOINT PART AND WIRING HARNESS USING THE SAME appearing in the Official Gazette of July 20, 2010 should be deleted since no patent was granted." "All reference to Patent No. 7,758,448 to Wataru Ban, et al of Chichibu- shi, Japan for GOLF CLUB HEAD appearing in the Official Gazette of July 20, 2010 should be deleted since no patent was granted." "All reference to Patent No. 7,758,450 to Wataru Ban of Chichibu-shi, Japan for GOLF CLUB HEAD appearing in the Official Gazette of July 20, 2010 should be deleted since no patent was granted." "All reference to Patent No. 7,758,850 to Isabelle Preuilh, et al of Le Cannet, France for FOAMING COMPOSITION FOR WASHING AND TREATING HAIR AND/OR SCALP BASED ON AN ACTIVE PRINCIPLE appearing in the Official Gazette of July 20, 2010 should be deleted since no patent was granted." "All reference to Patent No. 7,759,147 to James R. Webster, et al of San Jose, CA for LOW TEMPERATURE AMORPHOUS SILICON SACRIFICIAL LAYER FOR CON- TROLLED ADHESION IN MEMS DEVCES appearing in the Official Gazette of July 20, 2010 should be deleted since no patent was granted." "All reference to Patent No. 7,759,250 to Gi Ra Yi, et al of Daejeon Korea, Republic of for ADJUVANT FOR CONTROLLING POLISHING SELECTIVELY AND CHEMICAL MECHANICAL POLISHING SLURRY COMPRISING THE SAME appearing in the Official Gazette of July 20, 2010 should be deleted since no patent was granted." "All reference to Patent No. 7,759,688 to Tatsuya Honda of Isehara, Japan for LIGHT EMITTING DEVICE appearing in the Official Gazette of July 20, 2010 should be deleted since no patent was granted." "All reference to Patent No. 7,759,956 to Jody Greenberg, et al of Sunnyvale, CA for ON-DIE HEATING CIRCUIT AND CONTROL LOOP FOR RAPID HEATING OF THE DIE appearing in the Official Gazette of July 20, 2010 should be deleted since no patent was granted." "All reference to Patent No. 7,759,965 to Khwaja M. Rahman, et al of Troy, MI for SYSTEMS AND METHODS TO EVALUATE PERMANENT MAGNET MOTORS appearing in the Official Gazette of July 20, 2010 should be deleted since no patent was granted." "All reference to Patent No. 7,760,051 to Ning Guan of Sakura-Shi, Japan for REFLECTION-TYPE BANDPASS FILTER appearing in the Official Gazette of July 20, 2010 should be deleted since no patent was granted." "All reference to Patent No. 7,760,052 to Ning Guan of Sajura-shi, Japan for REFLECTION-TYPE BANDPASS FILTER appearing in the Official Gazette July 20, 2010 should be deleted since no patent was granted."
August 17, 2010 | US PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE | 1357 OG 202 |
"All reference to Patent No. 7,760,062 to Yasuhiko Mano, et al of Ogaki, Japan for INDUCTOR AND ELECTRIC POWER SUPPLY USING IT appearing in the Official Gazette of July 20, 2010 should be deleted since no patent was granted." "All reference to Patent No. 7,760,427 to Takashi Kawahito of Fujisawa- shi, Japan for AUTOMATIC FOCUS DETECTION DEVICE AND MICROSCOPE SYSTEM HAVING THE SAME appearing in the Official Gazette of July 20, 2010 should be deleted since no patent was granted." "All reference to Patent No. 7,760,534 to You Sung Kim of Seoul Korea, Republic of for SEMICONDUCTOR MEMORY DEVICE, AND MULTI-CHIP PACKAGE AND METHOD OF OPERATING THE SAME appearing in the Official Gazette of July 20, 2010 should be deleted since no patent was granted." "All reference to Patent No. 7,760,687 to Hak Seong Kim, et al of Gyeonggi-Do Korea, Republic of for METHOD FOR RETRANSMITTING DATA IN THE MULTI-CARRIER SYSTEM appearing in the Official Gazette of July 20, 2010 should be deleted since no patent was granted." "All reference to Patent No. 7,760,761 to Martin W. McKinnon III, et al of Atlanta, GA for METHODS OF ALLOCATING ACCESS ACROSS A SHARED COMMUNICATIONS MEDIUM appearing in the Official Gazette of July 20, 2010 should be deleted since no patent was granted." "All reference to Patent No. 7,760,894 to Timothy Prenta, et al of Simi Valley, CA for IN-WALL SUB-WOOFER SYSTEM WITH HIGH-VOLUME DISPLACEMENT appearing in the Official Gazette of July 20, 2010 should be deleted since no patent was granted." "All reference to Patent No. 7,761,007 to Hideyuki Miyata, et al of Kawasaki, Japan for OPTICAL NETWORK SYSTEM AND TRANSMISSION APPARATUS appearing in the Official Gazette of July 20, 2010 should be deleted since no patent was granted." "All reference to Patent No. 7,761,033 to Makoto Ishi, et al of Nagoya- shi, Japan for PHOTO-SENSITIVE MEMBER CARTRIDGE, DEVELOPER CARTRIDGE AND PROCESS AND PROCESS CARTRIDGE appearing in the Official Gazette of July 20, 2010 should be deleted since no patent was granted." "All reference to Patent No. 7,761,073 to Yuuta Nakaya of Kawasaki, Japan for MULTIPLE INPUT MULTIPLE OUTPUT COMMUNICATION APPARATUS appearing in the Official Gazette of July 20, 2010 should be deleted since no patent was granted." "All reference to Patent No. 7,761,074 to Junishi Noro of Akita, Japan for LOW-NOISE AMPLIFIER AND ANTENNA DEVICE HAVING THE SAME appearing in the Official Gazette of July 20, 2010 should be deleted since no patent was granted." "All reference to Patent No. 7,761,593 to Nobutaka Imamura of Kawasaki, Japan for COMMUNICATION INTERFACE DEVICE AND COMMUNICATION METHOD appearing in the Official Gazette of July 20, 2010 should be deleted since no patent was granted." "All reference to Patent No. 7,761,758 to Yu Huang, et al of Marlborough, MA for ENHANCED DIAGNOSIS WITH LIMITED FAILURE CYCLES appearing in the Official Gazette of July 20, 2010 should be deleted since no patent was granted."
Top of Notices August 17, 2010 | US PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE | Print This Notice 1357 OG 203 |
Certificates of Correction |
Certificates of Correction for July 27, 2010 5,636,719 7,385,734 7,649,058 7,704,553 5,771,394 7,385,746 7,649,382 7,704,963 6,776,346 7,391,198 7,652,901 7,705,125 6,780,764 7,395,042 7,652,911 7,706,477 6,790,444 7,401,351 7,653,108 7,706,573 6,881,209 7,420,652 7,653,255 7,706,805 6,896,686 7,421,032 7,654,822 7,707,096 6,920,511 7,421,688 7,655,236 7,707,165 6,928,513 7,423,655 7,655,349 7,707,424 6,931,487 7,428,900 7,655,828 7,707,592 6,934,826 7,435,935 7,657,106 7,707,618 6,938,331 7,444,890 7,657,526 7,708,778 6,940,248 7,446,980 7,658,591 7,709,037 6,956,631 7,447,080 7,660,028 7,709,055 6,957,433 7,447,678 7,660,287 7,709,354 6,966,896 7,450,893 7,660,461 7,709,701 6,972,085 7,456,408 7,660,727 7,710,899 6,982,089 7,460,343 7,660,728 7,710,902 7,033,764 7,462,593 7,660,729 7,711,425 7,047,047 7,476,399 7,660,794 7,711,816 7,048,448 7,477,920 7,663,019 7,712,121 7,051,014 7,479,907 7,663,165 7,712,586 7,051,276 7,481,572 7,663,202 7,712,595 7,051,366 7,483,799 7,663,713 7,712,637 7,051,917 7,483,974 7,664,994 7,713,232 7,057,616 7,486,774 7,665,652 7,713,319 7,067,905 7,490,050 7,666,578 7,713,857 7,071,415 7,501,884 7,668,738 7,714,262 7,071,949 7,509,560 7,669,261 7,714,845 7,080,383 7,509,702 7,669,960 7,715,021 7,082,433 7,523,415 7,671,002 7,715,122 7,085,412 7,525,660 7,671,071 7,715,357 7,088,179 7,527,842 7,671,088 7,715,651 7,089,415 7,528,147 7,671,112 7,715,710 7,089,537 7,532,810 7,671,209 7,716,149 7,091,951 7,539,947 7,673,166 7,716,340 7,092,014 7,544,362 7,673,305 7,716,857 7,095,899 7,547,411 7,674,077 7,716,949 7,096,012 7,547,681 7,674,172 7,717,243 7,096,228 7,548,195 7,674,537 7,717,672 7,097,137 7,549,918 7,674,610 7,717,903 7,097,271 7,553,639 7,675,276 7,718,095 7,103,788 7,554,705 7,676,137 7,718,523 7,108,988 7,556,381 7,676,141 7,718,686 7,111,925 7,556,938 7,676,671 7,718,766 7,115,607 7,557,211 7,677,268 7,719,154 7,127,754 7,557,499 7,677,718 7,719,426 7,136,792 7,563,248 7,678,789 7,720,265 7,146,465 7,567,779 7,678,930 7,720,451 7,146,467 7,568,145 7,679,223 7,720,644 7,149,769 7,569,563 7,679,461 7,721,543 7,149,789 7,571,173 7,679,647 7,722,009 7,149,919 7,571,426 7,679,878 7,722,818 7,153,664 7,573,894 7,680,484 7,723,583 7,154,696 7,575,589 7,681,199 7,724,049 7,155,055 7,577,627 7,683,538 7,724,719 7,156,068 7,579,342 7,683,717 7,725,190 7,158,668 7,580,971 7,684,941 7,725,425 7,159,174 7,581,167 7,684,942 7,726,561 7,162,691 7,582,875 7,685,697 7,727,131 7,171,352 7,584,202 7,686,113 7,727,349 7,191,401 7,584,975 7,687,610 7,727,401
August 17, 2010 | US PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE | 1357 OG 204 |
7,197,645 7,586,606 7,687,996 7,728,224 7,200,608 7,586,996 7,688,065 7,728,785 7,202,863 7,591,570 7,688,219 7,729,161 7,202,981 7,593,158 7,690,824 7,729,528 7,203,850 7,597,167 7,690,934 7,730,107 7,206,172 7,597,621 7,691,903 7,730,265 7,206,788 7,597,907 7,692,005 7,730,449 7,208,961 7,598,232 7,692,174 7,731,489 7,209,401 7,599,347 7,692,182 7,732,470 7,212,309 7,600,373 7,693,313 7,733,183 7,215,753 7,601,060 7,694,111 7,733,790 7,218,739 7,602,753 7,694,744 7,734,486 7,223,466 7,604,122 7,695,387 7,734,813 7,223,772 7,604,378 7,695,404 7,735,022 7,228,609 7,604,702 7,695,550 7,736,583 7,235,852 7,605,348 7,695,585 7,736,900 7,244,519 7,605,674 7,695,857 7,736,935 7,248,850 7,609,159 7,696,551 7,736,993 7,271,171 7,609,244 7,697,260 7,737,189 7,272,440 7,612,208 7,697,455 7,738,627 7,279,109 7,612,933 7,697,490 7,738,750 7,281,167 7,615,213 7,697,791 7,740,067 7,282,270 7,616,055 7,698,215 7,741,171 7,291,366 7,619,508 7,699,757 D.564,916 7,295,752 7,621,099 7,700,090 D.564,917 7,302,363 7,630,520 7,700,213 D.564,918 7,304,479 7,630,869 7,700,457 D.566,829 7,305,588 7,635,758 7,700,739 D.567,682 7,316,557 7,635,769 7,701,308 D.606,880 7,321,051 7,635,858 7,701,441 D.607,271 7,326,685 7,637,393 7,701,464 D.609,171 7,333,304 7,637,859 7,701,632 D.614,248 7,339,714 7,640,931 7,702,504 D.614,678 7,343,410 7,642,002 7,702,722 D.615,660 7,352,541 7,644,375 7,702,806 D.616,029 7,377,631 7,646,522 7,703,720 D.617,541 7,379,080 7,647,783 7,703,786 D.617,691 7,383,368 7,648,083 7,703,993 RE.40,968 7,384,929 7,648,966 7,704,322 7,385,730 7,649,029 7,704,512
Top of Notices August 17, 2010 | US PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE | Print This Notice 1357 OG 205 |
Summary of Final Decisions Issued by the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board |
SUMMARY OF FINAL DECISIONS ISSUED BY THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
July 12 – July 16, 2010
Date Issued |
Type of Case(1) | Proceeding or Appn. No. | Party or Parties | Issue | TTAB Decision | Opposer's or Petitioner's Mark and Goods or Services | Applicant's or Respondent's Mark and Goods or Services | Mark and Goods Cited by Examining Attorney | Issued as Precedent of TTAB |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
7-12 | EX | 79057695 | Zhangjiagang City Sunlink; PV Co., Ltd. | 2(d) | Refusal Affirmed | "SUNLINKPV" [Class 9: low voltage electrical power supplies; monocrystalline silicon solar cells; multicrystalline silicon solar cells] | "SUNLINK" [Class 9: mounting hardware for solar electric panels for roofs] | No | |
7-12 | CANC | 92050965 | Dallas C. Brown Jr. v. Courtney L. Bishop | SJ (res judicata and issue preclusion) | Motion Denied | "MAJOR TAYLOR" (and design) (two registrations) [Class 35: retail store and/or online computerized ordering services featuring bicycles, bicycle equipment, bicycle clothing, shoes, and apparel; promoting bicycle sports, bicycle competitions and/or events of others] [Class 36: financial and insurance underwriting services pertaining to fund raising associations, foundations, charitable not for profit organizations covering activities held within the normal scope of operations for these organizations, namely, fundraisers] |
No | ||
7-12 | OPP | 91171206 | Sunbeam Products, inc. v. Osram GmbH | SJ; 2(d) | Motion Denied | "OSTER" [a wide variety of goods including electric hair clippers for human use, electric toasters, electric heat massage machines and electric food mixers] | "OSTAR" [Class 9: light emitting diodes; light emitting diode displays and display circuit modules; and components of the aforementioned goods] | No | |
7-12 | EX | 77415033 | Florida State University Credit Union | 2(e)(1) | Refusal Affirmed | "COLLEGIATE COMMUNITY FINANCIAL" [Class 36: credit union services] | No | ||
7-12 | OPP | 91183317 | Golfino AG v. Gady Desler | 2(d) | Opposition Sustained | "GOLFINO" (and design) (two registrations) [Class 25: clothing, namely, hats, visors, caps, shoes, socks, stockings, leggings, knickers, pants, shorts, gloves, scarves, jumpers, sweaters, vests, shirts, t-shirts, skirts, undershirts, underpants, sweatshirts, golf shirts, jackets, rain jackets and tank tops Class 18: handbags] |
"GOLF SPORT" (and design) [Class 25: dress shirts; golf shirts; polo shirts; shirts; short-sleeved or long-sleeved t-shirts; short-sleeved shirts; sport shirts] | No | |
7-14 | OPP | 91191988 | Flash & Partners S.P.A. v. I. E. Mfg. LLC | MD Counter-claim | Motion Granted in Part, Denied in Part | "RR" (stylized) [Class 25: clothing, namely skirts, dresses, trousers, jeans, jackets, shirts, hosiery, overcoats, raincoats, coats, vests, bandanas, sweaters, t-shirts, gloves, belts, neckties, scarves and neckerchiefs, leather clothing, namely jackets, trousers, overcoats, waistcoats, skirts, shirts, belts and gloves; footwear; boots, sandals; shoes; hats] | "RR" (stylized) [Class 9: eyewear; sunglasses; goggles for sports; eyewear cases, namely cases for sports eyewear Class 25: t-shirts, sweatshirts, hats] |
Yes | |
7-14 | EX | 77492885 77493208 |
Ripple Kids Inc. | 2(d) | Refusal Affirmed as to Class 16; Reversed as to Class 25 (in each case) | "RIPPLE KIDS" and "RIPPLE KIDS" (and design) [both for Class 16: stationery and writing materials, namely, blank writing journals, notebooks, address books, daily planners, stickers, bookmarks, folders, pencils, pens, pencil cases, pencil boxes, printed award certificates, letterhead paper, business cards, postcards And Class 25: Clothing and apparel, namely, t-shirts, tank tops, caps, sweatshirts, beanies, jackets, golf shirts] |
"RIPPLE" and design [Class 16: books, printed journals and printed newsletters, all in the field of self help, motivation and holistic topics; blank cards; greeting cards; postcards; posters; stickers; calendars; writing paper; notepaper; wedding albums; scrapbook albums; photograph albums] | No | |
7-15 | OPP (R) | 91171967 | Pitonyak Machinery Corporation v. Brandt Industries Ltd. | 2(d) | Opposition Sustained as to Class 7, but Dismissed as to Classes 12 and 40 (Reconsideration of Dismissal as to Class 40 denied) | "BRANDT" (with and without other words) [agricultural machines, including grain carts, utility levelers, land levelers, filed rollers, stubble rollers, and quick hitches] |
"BRANDT" [Class 7: grain handling equipment, namely, augers, conveyors and vacuums; spraying equipment, namely, pull-type and three point sprayers; light duty tillage equipment, namely, harrows; livestock feeding and processing equipment, namely, bale processors] [Class 12: railroad vehicles, namely, road rail vehicles, locomotives, and railroad vehicles with both rail and highway drive systems] [Class 40: custom manufacture and fabrication of machine and railroad equipment] | No | |
7-15 | OPP | 91186089 | Gregory S. Licht v. Beach Foot International Pty Ltd | 2(d) | Opposition Sustained | "BEACH FEET" (and design) (two registrations) [sandals] [sports clothing, namely, swim wear, jackets, pants, shorts, T-shirts, socks, caps, hats, coats, footwear] | "BEACH FOOT" (and design) [towels, bath towels, beach towels] | No |
(1) EX=Ex Parte Appeal; OPP=Opposition; CANC=Cancellation; CU=Concurrent Use; (SJ)=Summary Judgment; (MD)=Motion to Dismiss; (MR)=Motion to Reopen; (R)=Request for Reconsideration (2) *=Opinion Writer; (D)=Dissenting Panel Member
Top of Notices August 17, 2010 | US PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE | Print Appendix 1357 OG |
Mailing and Hand Carry Addresses for Mail to the United States Patent and Trademark Office |
MAILING AND HAND CARRY ADDRESSES FOR MAIL TO THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE MAIL TO BE DIRECTED TO THE COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS For most correspondence (e.g., new patent applications) no mail stop is required because the processing of the correspondence is routine. If NO mail stop is included on the list below, no mail stop is required for the correspondence. See the listing under "Mail to be Directed to the Director of the Patent And Trademark Office" for additional mail stops for patent-related correspondence. Only the specified type of document should be placed in an envelope addressed to one of these special mail stops. If any documents other than the specified type identified for each special mail stop are addressed to that mail stop, they will be significantly delayed in reaching the appropriate area for which they are intended. The mail stop should generally appear as the first line in the address. Most correspondence may be submitted electronically. See the USPTO's Electronic Filing System (EFS-Web) internet page http://www.uspto.gov/patents/process/file/efs/index.jsp for additional information. Please address mail to be delivered by the United States Postal Service (USPS) as follows: Mail Stop _____ Commissioner for Patents P.O. Box 1450 Alexandria, VA 22313-1450 If no Mail Stop is indicated below, the line beginning Mail Stop should be omitted from the address. Except correspondence for Maintenance Fee payments, Deposit Account Replenishments (see 37 CFR 1.25(c)(4)), and Licensing and Review (see 37 CFR 5.1(c) and 5.2(c)), please address patent-related correspondence to be delivered by other delivery services (Federal Express (Fed Ex), UPS, DHL, Laser, Action, Purolator, etc.) as follows: United States Patent and Trademark Office Customer Service Window, Mail Stop _____ Randolph Building 401 Dulany Street Alexandria, VA 22314 Mail Stop Designations Explanation Mail Stop 12 Contributions to the Examiner Education Program. Mail Stop 313(c) Petitions under 37 CFR 1.313(c) to withdraw a patent application from issue after payment of the issue fee and any papers associated with the petition, including papers necessary for a continuing application or a request for continued examination (RCE). Mail Stop AF Amendments and other responses after final rejection (e.g., a notice of appeal (and any request for pre-appeal brief conference)), other than an appeal brief. Mail Stop Amendment Information disclosure statements, drawings, and replies to Office actions in patent applications with or without an amendment to the application or a terminal disclaimer. (Use Mail Stop AF for replies after final rejection.) Mail Stop Appeal For appeal briefs or other briefs under Brief-Patents part 41 of title 37 of the Code of Federal Regulations (e.g., former 37 CFR 1.192). Mail Stop Public comments regarding patent-related Comments-Patent regulations and procedures. Mail Stop Conversion Requests under 37 CFR 1.53(c)(2) to convert a nonprovisional application to a provisional application and requests under 37 CFR 1.53(c)(3) to convert a provisional application to a nonprovisional application. Mail Stop EBC Mail for the Electronic Business Center including: Certificate Action Forms, Request for Customer Number, and Requests for Customer Number Data Change (USPTO Forms PTO-2042, PTO/SB/124A and 125A, respectively) and Customer Number Upload Spreadsheets and Cover Letters. Mail Stop Expedited Only to be used for the initial filing of Design design applications accompanied by a request for expedited examination under 37 CFR 1.155. Mail Stop Express Requests for abandonment of a patent Abandonment application pursuant to 37 CFR 1.138, including any petitions under 37 CFR 1.138(c) to expressly abandon an application to avoid publication of the application. Mail Stop Applications under 35 U.S.C. 156 for patent term Hatch-Waxman PTE extension based on regulatory review of a product subject to pre-market review by a regulating agency. This mail stop is also to be used for additional correspondence regarding the application for patent term extension under 35 U.S.C. 156. It is preferred that such initial requests be hand-carried to: Office of Patent Legal Administration Room MDW 7D55 600 Dulany Street (Madison Building) Alexandria, VA 22314 Mail Stop ILS Correspondence relating to international patent classification, exchanges and standards. Mail Stop Issue Fee All communications following the receipt of a PTOL-85, "Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due," and prior to the issuance of a patent should be addressed to Mail Stop Issue Fee, unless advised to the contrary. Assignments are the exception. Assignments (with cover sheets) should be faxed to 571-273-0140, electronically submitted (http://epas.uspto.gov), or submitted in a separate envelope and sent to Mail Stop Assignment Recordation Services, Director - U.S. Patent and Trademark Office as shown below. Mail Stop L&R All documents pertaining to applications subject to secrecy order pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 181, or national-security classified and required to be processed accordingly. Such papers, petitions for foreign filing license pursuant to 37 CFR 5.12(b) for which expedited handling is requested, and petitions for retroactive license under 37 CFR 5.25 may also be hand carried to Licensing and Review: Technology Center 3600, Office of the Director Room 4B41 501 Dulany Street (Knox Building) Alexandria, VA 22314 Mail Stop Missing Requests for a corrected filing receipt and Parts replies to OPAP notices such as the Notice of Omitted Items, Notice to File Corrected Application Papers, Notice of Incomplete Application, Notice to Comply with Nucleotide Sequence Requirements, and Notice to File Missing Parts of Application, and associated papers and fees. Mail Stop MPEP Submissions concerning the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure. Mail Stop Patent Ext. Applications for patent term extension or adjustment under 35 U.S.C. 154 and any communications relating thereto. This mail stop is limited to petitions for patent term extension under 35 U.S.C. 154 for applications filed between June 8, 1995 and May 29, 2000, and patent term adjustment (PTA) under 35 U.S.C. 154 for applications filed on or after May 29, 2000. For applications for patent term extension under 35 U.S.C. 156, use Mail Stop Hatch-Waxman PTE. For applications for patent term extension or adjustment under 35 U.S.C. 154 that are mailed together with the payment of the issue fee, use Mail Stop Issue Fee. Mail Stop Patent Submission of comments regarding search templates. Search Template Comments Mail Stop PCT Mail related to international applications filed under the Patent Cooperation Treaty in the international phase and in the national phase under 35 U.S.C. 371 prior to mailing of a Notification of Acceptance of Application Under 35 U.S.C. 371 and 37 CFR 1.495 (Form PCT/DO/EO/903). Mail Stop Petition Petitions to be decided by the Office of Petitions, including petitions to revive and petitions to accept late payment of issue fees or maintenance fees. Mail Stop PGPUB Correspondence regarding publication of patent applications not otherwise provided, including: requests for early publication made after filing, rescission of a non-publication request, corrected patent application publication, and refund of publication fee. Mail Stop Post In patented files: requests for changes of Issue correspondence address, powers of attorney, revocations of powers of attorney, withdrawal as attorney or agent and submissions under 37 CFR 1.501. Designation of, or changes to, a fee address should be addressed to Mail Stop M Correspondence. Requests for Certificate of Correction need no special mail stop, but should be mailed to the attention of Certificate of Correction Branch. Mail Stop RCE Requests for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114. Mail Stop Correspondence pertaining to the reconstruction Reconstruction of lost patent files. Mail Stop Ex Parte Original requests for Ex Parte Reexamination Reexam and all subsequent corresponcence other than correspondence to the Office of the Solicitor (see 37 CFR 1.1(a)(3) and 1.302(c)). Mail Stop Inter Original requests for Inter Partes Reexamination Partes Reexam and all subsequent correspondence other than correspondence to the Office of the Solicitor (see 37 CFR 1.1(a)(3) and 1.302(c)). Mail Stop Reissue All new and continuing reissue application filings. Mail Stop Sequence Submission of the computer readable form (CRF) for applications with sequence listings, when the CRF is not being filed with the patent application. Information for addressing trademark-related correspondence may also be found on the USPTO's web site at http://www.uspto.gov/patents/mail.jsp. MAIL TO BE DIRECTED TO THE COMMISSIONER FOR TRADEMARKS Please address trademark-related correspondence to be delivered by the United States Postal Service (USPS), except documents sent to the Assignment Services Division for recordation, requests for copies of trademark documents, and documents directed to the Madrid Processing Unit, as follows: Commissioner for Trademarks P.O. Box 1451 Alexandria, VA 22313-1451 Mail to be delivered by the USPS to the Office's Madrid Processing Unit, must be mailed to: Madrid Processing Unit 600 Dulany Street MDE-7B87 Alexandria, VA 22314-5796 Mail to be delivered by the USPS to the Office's Deputy Commissioner for Trademark Policy regarding Letters of Protest must be mailed to: Letter of Protest ATTN: Deputy Commissioner for Trademark Policy 600 Dulany Street Alexandria, VA 22314-5796 Mail to be delivered by the USPS to the Director regarding the Fastener Quality Act (FQA) must be mailed to: Director, USPTO ATTN: FQA 600 Dulany Street, MDE-10A71 Alexandria, VA 22314-5793 Mail to be delivered by the USPS to the Commissioner regarding the recordal of a Native American Tribal Insignia (NATI) must be mailed to: Native American Tribal Insignia ATTN: Commissioner for Trademarks 600 Dulany Street MDE-10A71 Alexandria, VA 22314-5793 Do NOT send any of the following via USPS certified mail or with a "signature required" option: submissions to the Madrid Processing Unit, Letters of Protest, applications for recordal of insignia under the Fastener Quality Act, notifications of Native American Tribal Insignia. Trademark-related mail to be delivered by hand or other private courier or delivery service (e.g., UPS, Federal Express) to the Trademark Operation, the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or the Office's Madrid Processing Unit, must be delivered to: Trademark Assistance Center Madison East, Concourse Level Room C 55 600 Dulany Street Alexandria, VA 22314 Information for addressing trademark-related correspondence may also be found on the USPTO's web site at http://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/mail.jsp. MAIL TO BE DIRECTED TO THE DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE Please address mail to be directed to a mail stop identified below to be delivered by the United States Postal Service (USPS) as follows (unless otherwise instructed): Mail Stop _____ Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office P.O. Box 1450 Alexandria, VA 22313-1450 Mail Stop Designations Explanation Mail Stop 3 Mail for the Office of Personnel from NFC. Mail Stop 6 Mail for the Office of Procurement. Mail Stop 8 All papers for the Office of the Solicitor. Mail Stop 11 Mail for the Electronic Ordering Service (EOS). Mail Stop 13 Mail for the Employee and Labor Relations Division. Mail Stop 16 Mail related to refund requests, other than requests for refund of a patent application publication fee. Such requests should be directed to Mail Stop PGPub. Mail Stop 17 Invoices directed to the Office of Finance. Mail Stop 24 Mail for the Inventor's Assistance Program, including complaints about Invention Promoters. Mail Stop 171 Vacancy Announcement Applications. Mail Stop Assignment All assignment documents, security interests, Recordation Services and other documents to be recorded in the Assignment records. Note that documents with cover sheets that are faxed to 571-273-0140 or submitted electronically (http://epas.uspto.gov) are processed much more quickly than those submitted by mail. Mail Stop Document All requests for certified or uncertified Services copies of patent or trademark documents. Mail Stop EEO Mail for the Office of Civil Rights. Mail Stop External Mail for the Office of External Affairs. Affairs Mail Stop Interference Communications relating to interferences and applications and patents involved in interference. Mail Stop M Mail to designate or change a fee Correspondence address, or other correspondence related to maintenance fees, except payments of maintenance fees in patents. See below for the address for maintenance fee payments. Mail Stop OED Mail for the Office of Enrollment and Discipline. Maintenance Fee Payments Unless submitted electronically over the Internet at www.uspto.gov, payments of maintenance fees in patents should be mailed through the United States Postal Service to: United States Patent and Trademark Office P.O. Box 979070 St. Louis, MO 63197-9000 Alternatively, payment of maintenance fees in patents (Attn: Maintenance Fee) using hand-delivery and delivery by private courier may be made to: Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office Attn: Maintenance Fee 2051 Jamieson Avenue, Suite 300 Alexandria, Virginia 22314 Deposit Account Replenishments To send payment to replenish deposit accounts, send the payments through the United States Postal Service to: United States Patent and Trademark Office P.O. Box 979065 St. Louis, MO 63197-9000 Alternatively, deposit account replenishments (Attn: Deposit Accounts) using hand-delivery and delivery by private courier (e.g., FedEx, UPS, etc.) may be delivered to: Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office Attn: Deposit Accounts 2051 Jamieson Avenue, Suite 300 Alexandria, Virginia 22314
Reference Collections of U.S. Patents Available for Public Use in Patent Depository Libraries |
Reference Collections of U.S. Patents and Trademarks Available for Public Use in Patent and Trademark Depository Libraries The following libraries, designated as Patent and Trademark Depository Libraries (PTDLs), provide public access to patent and trademark information received from the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). This information includes all issued patents, all registered trademarks, the Official Gazette of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, search tools such as the Cassis CD-ROM suite of products and supplemental information in a variety of formats including online, optical disc, microfilm and paper. Each PTDL also offers access to USPTO resources on the Internet and to PubWEST (Web based examiner search tool), a system used by patent examiners that is not available on the Internet. Staff assistance and training is provided in the use of this information. All information is available free of charge. However, there may be charges associated with the use of photocopying and related services. Hours of service to the public vary, and anyone contemplating use of these collections at a particular library is urged to contact that library in advance about its services and hours to avoid inconvenience. State Name of Library Telephone Contact Alabama Auburn University Libraries (334) 844-1737 Birmingham Public Library (205) 226-3620 Alaska Fairbanks: Keith B. Mather Library, Geophysical Institute, University of Alaska, Fairbanks (907) 474-2636 Arkansas Little Rock: Arkansas State Library (501) 682-2053 California Los Angeles Public Library (213) 228-7220 Riverside: University of California, Riverside Libraries (951) 827-3316 Sacramento: California State Library (916) 654-0069 San Diego Public Library (619) 236-5813 San Francisco Public Library (415) 557-4500 Sunnyvale Public Library (408) 730-7300 Colorado Denver Public Library (720) 865-1711 Connecticut Fairfield: Ryan-Matura Library Sacred Heart University (203) 371-7726 Delaware Newark: University of Delaware Library (302) 831-2965 Dist. of Columbia Washington: Howard University Libraries (202) 806-7252 Florida Fort Lauderdale: Broward County Main Library (954) 357-7444 Miami-Dade Public Library (305) 375-2665 Orlando: University of Central Florida Libraries (407) 823-2562 Georgia Atlanta: Price Gilbert Memorial Library, Georgia Institute of Technology (404) 385-7185 Hawaii Honolulu: Hawaii State Public Library System (808) 586-3477 Illinois Chicago Public Library (312) 747-4450 Indiana Indianapolis-Marion County Public Library (317) 269-1741 West Lafayette Siegesmund Engineering Library, Purdue University (765) 494-2872 Kansas Wichita: Ablah Library, Wichita State University 1 (800) 572-8368 Kentucky Louisville Free Public Library (502) 574-1611 Louisiana Baton Rouge: Troy H. Middleton Library, Louisiana State University (225) 388-8875 Maine Orono: Raymond H. Fogler Library, University of Maine (207) 581-1678 Maryland Baltimore: University of Baltimore Law Library (410) 837-4554 College Park: Engineering and Physical Sciences Library, University of Maryland (301) 405-9157 Massachusetts Amherst: Physical Sciences Library, University of Massachusetts (413) 545-2765 Boston Public Library (617) 536-5400 Ext. 4256 Michigan Ann Arbor: Art, Architecture & Engineering Library, University of Michigan (734) 647-5735 Big Rapids: Ferris Library for Information, Technology & Education, Ferris State University (231) 592-3602 Detroit: Public Library (313) 481-1391 Minnesota Hennepin County Library Minneapolis Central Library (952) 847-8000 Mississippi Jackson: Mississippi Library Commission (601) 961-4111 Missouri Kansas City: Linda Hall Library (816) 363-4600 Ext. 724 St. Louis Public Library (314) 241-2288 Ext. 390 Montana Butte: Montana College of Mineral Science and Technology Library (406) 496-4281 Nebraska Lincoln: Engineering Library, University of Nebraska-Lincoln (402) 472-3411 Nevada Las Vegas--Clark County Library District (702) 507-3421 Reno: University of Nevada, Reno Library (775) 784-6500 Ext. 257 New Jersey Newark Public Library (973) 733-7779 Piscataway: Library of Science and Medicine, Rutgers University (732) 445-2895 New Mexico Albuquerque: University of New Mexico General Library (505) 277-4412 New York Albany: New York State Library (518) 474-5355 Buffalo and Erie County Public Library (716) 858-7101 Rochester Public Library (716) 428-8110 New York Library (The Research Libraries) (212) 592-7000 Stony Brook: Engineering Library, State University of New York (631) 632-7148 North Carolina Charlotte: J. Murrey Atkins Library, (704) 687-2241 University of North Carolina at Charlotte (919) 515-2935 North Dakota Grand Forks: Chester Fritz Library, University of North Dakota (701) 777-4888 Ohio Akron - Summit County Public (330) 643-9075 Library Cincinnati and Hamilton County, Public Library of (513) 369-6932 Cleveland Public Library (216) 623-2870 Dayton: Paul Laurence Dunbar Library, Wright State University (937) 775-3521 Toledo/Lucas County Public Library (419) 259-5209 Oklahoma Stillwater: Oklahoma State University Edmon Low Library (405) 744-6546 Oregon Portland: Paul L. Boley Law Library, Lewis & Clark College (503) 768-6786 Pennsylvania Philadelphia, The Free Library of (215) 686-5394 Pittsburgh, Carnegie Library of (412) 622-3138 University Park: Pattee Library, Pennsylvania State University (814) 865-7617 Puerto Rico Mayaquez General Library, University of Puerto Rico (787) 993-0000 Ext. 3244 Bayamon, Learning Resources Center, University of Puerto Rico (787) 786-5225 Rhode Island Providence Public Library (401) 455-8027 South Carolina Clemson University Libraries (864) 656-3024 South Dakota Rapid City: Devereaux Library, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology (605) 394-1275 Tennessee Nashville: Stevenson Science Library, Vanderbilt University (615) 322-2717 Texas Austin: McKinney Engineering Library, University of Texas at Austin (512) 495-4511 College Station: West Campus Library, Texas A & M University (979) 845-2111 Dallas Public Library (214) 670-1468 Houston: The Fondren Library, Rice University (713) 348-5483 Lubbock: Texas Tech University (806) 742-2282 San Antonio Public Library (210) 207-2500 Utah Salt Lake City: Marriott Library, University of Utah (801) 581-8394 Vermont Burlington: Bailey/Howe Library, University of Vermont (802) 656-2542 Washington Seattle: Engineering Library, University of Washington (206) 543-0740 West Virginia Morgantown: Evansdale Library, West Virginia University (304) 293-4695 Wisconsin Madison: Kurt F. Wendt Library, University of Wisconsin Madison (608) 262-6845 Milwaukee Public Library (414) 286-3051 Wyoming Cheyenne: Wyoming State Library (307) 777-7281
Patent Technology Centers |
PATENT TECHNOLOGY CENTERS | ||
AVERAGE FILING DATE OF APPLICATIONS RECEIVING A FIRST OFFICE ACTION IN THE LAST 3 MONTHS | ||
Technology Center |
GAU | Avg Filing Date1 |
1600 | BIOTECHNOLOGY, AND ORGANIC CHEMISTRY | |
1610 | 7/1/2007 | |
1620 | 1/18/2008 | |
1630 | 12/19/2007 | |
1640 | 4/5/2008 | |
1650 | 1/3/2008 | |
1660 | 10/26/2008 | |
TOTAL | 12/22/2007 | |
1700/2900 | CHEMICAL AND MATERIALS ENGINEERING AND DESIGNS | |
1790 | 9/5/2007 | |
TOTAL | 9/5/2007 | |
2910 | 1/30/2009 | |
TOTAL | 1/30/2009 | |
2100 | COMPUTER ARCHITECTURE AND SOFTWARE | |
2110 | 8/27/2007 | |
2120 | 6/16/2007 | |
2150 | 8/30/2007 | |
2160 | 8/30/2007 | |
2170 | 2/22/2007 | |
2180 | 9/23/2007 | |
2190 | 3/29/2006 | |
TOTAL | 5/14/2007 | |
2400 | NETWORKING, MULTIPLEXING, CABLE AND SECURITY | |
2420 | 5/29/2007 | |
2430 | 1/20/2007 | |
2440 | 8/3/2007 | |
2450 | 9/5/2007 | |
2460 | 10/11/2007 | |
2470 | 11/10/2007 | |
TOTAL | 6/10/2007 | |
2600 | COMMUNICATIONS | |
2610 | 2/28/2007 | |
2620 | 2/4/2007 | |
TOTAL | 2/16/2007 | |
2800 | SEMICONDUCTORS/MEMORY, CIRCUITS/MEASURING AND TESTING, OPTICS/PHOTOCOPYING | |
2810 | 3/21/2008 | |
2820 | 2/26/2008 | |
2830 | 3/21/2008 | |
2840 | 11/28/2007 | |
2850 | 11/7/2007 | |
2860 | 12/10/2007 | |
2870 | 1/12/2008 | |
2880 | 1/18/2008 | |
2890 | 3/24/2008 | |
TOTAL | 2/8/2008 | |
3600 | TRANSPORTATION, CONSTRUCTION, ELECTRONIC COMMERCE, AGRICULTURE, NATIONAL SECURITY AND LICENSE AND REVIEW | |
3610 | 2/5/2008 | |
3620 | 12/18/2006 | |
3630 | 12/19/2007 | |
3640 | 1/9/2008 | |
3650 | 10/14/2007 | |
3660 | 9/23/2007 | |
3670 | 4/2/2008 | |
3680 | 12/27/2006 | |
3690 | 11/4/2007 | |
TOTAL | 10/14/2007 | |
3700 | MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING AND PRODUCTS | |
3710 | 8/12/2007 | |
3720 | 12/19/2007 | |
3730 | 6/4/2007 | |
3740 | 7/28/2007 | |
3750 | 7/16/2007 | |
3760 | 10/23/2007 | |
3770 | 5/20/2007 | |
3780 | 6/4/2007 | |
TOTAL | 8/21/2007 | |
1 Average Filing date of applications receiving a First Office action in the last 3 months. |
Subscription/Copy Information |
The Electronic Official Gazette of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office - Patents (eOG:P) provides the information in electronic format on CD-ROM. The eOG:P is published every Tuesday and includes bibliographic information, a representative claim, and a drawing (if applicable) of each patent issued that week. Patents are accessible by type of patent (utility, plant, etc.), classification (class or class/subclass), patentee name, and geographical location. Links enable users to "jump" to a specific patent from these various indexes. The eOG:P is sold as an annual subscription or as single copies.
Subscriptions are $430.00 per year, with single copies available for $20.00. For single copy purchases, please specify date and volume/issue number. Order forms are available in MS Word® or Adobe® Acrobat® format.
Get the MS Word® format
here.
or
Get the Acrobat® version
here.
Go here if you do not have Adobe® Acrobat® Reader installed.
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
Information Products Division
RSQ - 5A22
P.O. Box 1450
Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
(571) 272-5600
or
email at
IPD@uspto.gov
This CD-ROM product includes PDF files which requires a PDF file reader program. Adobe® Systems Inc. provides such a reader at their web site. This link requires connection to the internet.
If you do not have connection to the internet this CD also contains version 5 of the Adobe® Acrobat® Reader. Click to install Adobe Acrobat Reader 5. For the latest version of the reader please visit the Adobe® web site.