| Patent Prosecution Highway |
Referenced Items (165, 166, 167, 168, 169, 170, 171, 172, 173, 174, 175, 176, 177, 178, 179, 180, 181, 182, 183, 184, 185, 186, 187, 188, 189, 190, 191, 192, 193, 194, 195, 196, 197, 198, 199, 200, 201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208, 209, 210, 211, 212, 213, 214, 215, 216, 217, 218, 219) |
(216) Patent Prosecution Highway Pilot Program between the
United States Patent and Trademark Office and the
Canadian Intellectual Property Office
I. Background
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has established a
21st Century Strategic Plan to transform the USPTO into a more quality-
focused, highly productive, responsive organization supporting a market-
driven intellectual property system. One of the specific action plans of
the 21st Century Strategic Plan is to share search results with other
intellectual property offices. By relying on the search results obtained
via partnerships with other intellectual property offices, we can reduce
duplication of efforts and decrease workload.
Since the beginning of July 2006, the USPTO has partnered with the Japan
Patent Office (JPO) on a Patent Prosecution Highway pilot program (PPH).
The PPH pilot program leverages accelerated examination procedures already
available in both offices to allow applicants in both offices to obtain
corresponding patents faster and more efficiently. The PPH pilot program
also permits each office to benefit from the work previously done by the
other office, in turn reducing workload and improving patent quality. The
USPTO and the JPO agreed to fully implement the PPH program starting
January 28, 2008.
USPTO has also commenced a PPH pilot program with the United Kingdom
Intellectual Property Office on September 4, 2007, based on the same
framework as the PPH pilot program between the USPTO and JPO.
The USPTO had discussions with the Canadian Intellectual Property Office
(CIPO) to launch a PPH pilot program similar to the PPH pilot programs
between the USPTO and JPO and between the USPTO and UK IPO. USPTO and CIPO
agreed that consistency between PPH pilot programs should be maintained to
the extent possible, to avoid creating burdens on applicants and offices,
and to ensure maximum work-sharing potential.
II. Patent Prosecution Highway Pilot Program
The PPH was established to enable an applicant whose claims are determined
to be allowable in the Office of first filing (OFF) to have the
corresponding application filed in the Office of second filing (OSF)
advanced out of turn for examination while at the same time allowing the
OSF to exploit the search and examination results of the OFF.
Where the USPTO is the OFF and the U.S. application contains claims that
are determined to be allowable, the applicant may likewise request
accelerated examination in the CIPO for the corresponding application filed
in the CIPO as the OSF. The procedures and requirements for filing a
request to the CIPO for participation in the PPH pilot program are
available from the CIPO web site at: http://www.cipo.ic.gc.ca/pph/. Where
the CIPO is the OSF, the CIPO will access the necessary documents for
requesting participation in the PPH pilot program from the USPTO public
PAIR system. In those rare situations where the U.S. application has not
been published, and therefore the U.S. file wrapper is not available via
public PAIR, applicant would have to provide the necessary copies to the
CIPO. In the event that the CIPO requests a copy of the necessary
documents from the USPTO, the USPTO would not provide such copies to the
CIPO unless authorization from the applicant is of record in the U.S.
application.
Where the USPTO is the OSF and the corresponding application filed in the
CIPO as the OFF contains claims that are determined to be allowable, the
applicant may request participation in the PPH pilot program in the USPTO
and petition to make the U.S. application special under the PPH pilot
program. Note that the procedures for a petition to make special under the
 Top of Notices (216) December 27, 2011 |
US PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE |
1373 CNOG 880 |
accelerated examination program set forth in MPEP 708.02(a) do NOT apply to
a petition to make special under the PPH pilot program. The procedures and
requirements for filing a request in the USPTO for participation in PPH
pilot program are set forth below.
A. Trial Period for the PPH Pilot Program
The PPH pilot program will commence on January 28, 2008, for a period of
one year ending on January 28, 2009. The trial period may be extended for
up to an additional year if necessary to adequately assess the feasibility
of the PPH program. The USPTO and the CIPO will evaluate the results of the
pilot program to determine whether and how the program should be fully
implemented after the trial period. The Offices may also terminate the PPH
pilot program early if the volume of participation exceeds manageable
level, or for any other reason. Notice will be published if the PPH pilot
program will be terminated before the January 28, 2009 date.
B. Requirements for Requesting Participation in the PPH Pilot Program in
the USPTO
In order to be eligible to participate in the PPH pilot program, the
following conditions must be met:
(1) The U.S. application is
(a) a Paris Convention application which either
(i) validly claims priority under 35 U.S.C. 119(a) and 37 CFR 1.55 to
one or more applications filed in the CIPO, or
(ii) validly claims priority under 35 U.S.C. 119(a)/365(a) to a PCT
application that contains no priority claims,
or
(b) a national stage application under the PCT (an application which
entered the national stage in the U.S. from a PCT international
application after compliance with 35 U.S.C. 371), which PCT application
(i) validly claims priority under 35 U.S.C. 365(b) to an application
filed in the CIPO, or
(ii) validly claims priority under 35 U.S.C. 365(b) to a PCT
application that contains no priority claims, or
(iii) contains no priority claim,
or
(c) a so-called bypass application filed under 35 U.S.C. 111(a) which
validly claims benefit under 35 U.S.C. 120 to a PCT application, which
PCT application
(i) validly claims priority under 35 U.S.C. 365(b) to an application
filed in the CIPO, or
(ii) validly claims priority under 35 U.S.C. 365(b) to a PCT
application that contains no priority claims, or
(iii) contains no priority claim.
Examples of U.S. applications that fall under requirement (1) are:
(1)(a)(i):
| Top of Notices (216) December 27, 2011 |
US PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE |
1373 CNOG 881 |
(1)(a)(ii):
* DO - Designated Office
(1)(b)(i):
(1)(b)(ii):
(1)(b)(iii):
(1)(c)(i):
(1)(c)(ii):
(1)(c)(iii):
Provisional applications, plant and design applications, reissue
applications, reexamination proceedings, and applications subject to a
secrecy order are excluded.
(2) The CIPO application(s) have at least one claim that was determined by
the CIPO to be allowable. Applicant must submit a copy of the allowable
claims from the CIPO application(s). If the allowable claims from the CIPO
application(s) are in a language other than English, then applicant must
also submit an English translation of the allowable claims and a statement
that the English translation is accurate.
(3) All the claims in each U.S. application for which a request for
participation in the PPH pilot program is made must sufficiently correspond
or be amended to sufficiently correspond to the allowable claims in the
CIPO application(s). Claims will be considered to sufficiently correspond
where, accounting for differences due to translations and claim format
requirements, the claims are of the same or similar scope. Applicant is
also required to submit a claims correspondence table in English. The
claims correspondence table must indicate how all the claims in the U.S.
application correspond to the allowable claims in the CIPO application(s).
(4) Examination of the U.S. application for which participation in the PPH
pilot program is requested has not begun.
(5) Applicant must file a request for participation in the PPH pilot
program and a petition to make the U.S. application special under the PPH
pilot program. A sample request/petition form (PTO/SB/20CA) is available
from the USPTO web site at http://www.uspto.gov. Applicants are encouraged
to use the USPTO request/petition form. A petition fee under 37 CFR 1.17(h)
for the petition to make special under 37 CFR 1.102(d) is required and must
be submitted.
(6) Applicant must submit a copy of all the office actions from each of the
CIPO application(s) containing the allowable claims that are the basis for
the request, along with an English translation thereof and a statement that
the English translation is accurate (if the office actions are not in the
English language).
(7) Applicant must submit an information disclosure statement (IDS) listing
the documents cited by the CIPO examiner in the CIPO office action (unless
such an IDS has already been filed in the U.S. application). Applicant must
submit copies of all the documents cited in the CIPO office action (unless
the copies have already been filed in the U.S. application) except U.S.
patents or U.S. patent application publications.
| Top of Notices (216) December 27, 2011 |
US PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE |
1373 CNOG 882 |
The request for participation in the PPH pilot program and all the
supporting documents must be submitted to the USPTO via EFS-Web and indexed
as PPH.PET.652. Information regarding EFS-Web is available at
http://www.ustpo.ogv/ebc/efs_help.html. Any preliminary amendments and IDS
submitted with the PPH documents must be separately indexed as a
preliminary amendment and IDS, respectively.
Where the request for participation in the PPH pilot program and special
status are granted, applicant will be notified and the U.S. application
will be advanced out of turn for examination. In those instances where the
request for participation in the PPH pilot program does not meet all the
requirements set forth above, applicant will be notified and the defects in
the request will be identified. Applicant will be given one opportunity to
perfect the request in a renewed request for participation (which must be
submitted via EFS-Web and indexed accordingly as noted above). Note that
action on the application by the examiner will NOT be suspended (37 CFR
1.103) awaiting a reply by the applicant to perfect the request in a
renewed request for participation. That is, if the application is picked up
for examination by the examiner after applicant has been notified of the
defects in the request, any renewed request will be dismissed. If the
renewed request is perfected and examination has not begun, the request and
special status will be granted, applicant will be notified and the U.S.
application will be advanced out of turn for examination. If not perfected,
applicant will be notified and the application will await action in its
regular turn.
(8) Request for participation in the PPH pilot program and special status
granted in a parent application will not carry over to a continuing
application. Continuing applications must separately fulfill the conditions
set forth above.
If any of the documents identified in items (2), (6) and (7) above have
already been filed in the U.S. application prior to the request for
participation in the PPH pilot program, it will not be necessary for
applicant to resubmit these documents with the request for participation.
Applicant may simply refer to these documents and indicate in the request
for participation in the PPH pilot program when these documents were
previously filed in the U.S. application.
C. Special Examining Procedures
Once the request for participation in the PPH pilot program and special
status have been granted to the U.S. application, the U.S. application will
be taken up for examination by the U.S. examiner before all other
categories of applications except those clearly in condition for allowance,
those with set time limits, such as examiner's answers, and those that have
been granted special status for "accelerated examination."
Any claims amended or added after the grant of the request for
participation in the PPH pilot program must sufficiently correspond to one
or more allowable claims in the CIPO application(s). Applicant is required
to submit a claims correspondence table along with the amendment (see B.(3)
above). If the amended or newly added claims do not sufficiently correspond
to the allowable claims in the CIPO application(s), the amendment will not
be entered and will be treated as a non-responsive reply. After the grant
of the request for participation in the PPH pilot, if any of the CIPO
application(s) contain office correspondence subsequent to the Notice of
Allowance related to changes in the claims or the status of the CIPO
applications, applicant must also submit copies of the CIPO office
correspondence.
The PPH program does not absolve applicants of all their duties under 37
CFR 1.56 and 37 CFR 10.18. By complying with requirements (6) and (7)
identified above, applicants would be considered to have complied with
their duties to bring to the attention of the USPTO any material prior art
| Top of Notices (216) December 27, 2011 |
US PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE |
1373 CNOG 883 |
cited in the corresponding foreign application(s) (see MPEP § 2001.06(a)).
Applicants still have a duty of candor and good faith, including providing
to the USPTO other information known to them to be material to
patentability.
Any inquiries concerning this notice may be directed to Magdalen Greenlief,
Office of the Deputy Commissioner for Patent Examination Policy at
571-272-8800 or at magdalen.greenlief@uspto.gov.
January 14, 2008 JON W. DUDAS
Under Secretary of Commerce for
Intellectual Property and Director of the
United States Patent and Trademark Office
[1327 OG 45]